From: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de" <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"naamax.meir@linux.intel.com" <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>,
"Ruinskiy, Dima" <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>,
"Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Brandt, Todd E" <todd.e.brandt@intel.com>,
"dmummenschanz@web.de" <dmummenschanz@web.de>,
"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:45:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ccca7897-ac53-4056-8617-a3ace57bf7b6@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98ccb75d7ef48c182425f130e0b2ececeec630ec.camel@intel.com>
On 6/10/24 22:14, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Dear Hui,
>>
>>
>>
>> Naama also added Tested-by lines two both commits in question. Could
>> Intel’s test coverage please extended to the problem at hand?
>>
>> Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
> Plus that,
> 1. Todd and I can test with upstream + this patch to confirm that
> a. the regression for Todd is gone.
> b. the s2idle failure for me is back
> 2. I can test with upstream + this patch + revert of commit
> 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force SMBUS from enable ulp function to
> avoid PHY loss issue) to confirm s2idle is working again.
>
> thanks,
> rui
Thanks.
>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 1:32 [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function" Hui Wang
2024-06-10 6:36 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-10 14:14 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-11 5:45 ` Hui Wang [this message]
2024-06-11 5:43 ` Hui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ccca7897-ac53-4056-8617-a3ace57bf7b6@canonical.com \
--to=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
--cc=dmummenschanz@web.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=naamax.meir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
--cc=todd.e.brandt@intel.com \
--cc=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox