* [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce support for Monaco-ac-sku Evaluation Kit
@ 2026-03-31 18:44 Umang Chheda
2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support Umang Chheda
2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: Add monaco-ac EVK board Umang Chheda
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Umang Chheda @ 2026-03-31 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran
Cc: linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, Umang Chheda, netdev,
Faruque Ansari
Add support for Qualcomm's Monaco-ac-sku Evaluation Kit (EVK) without
safety monitoring feature of Safety Island(SAIL) subsystem.
This board is based on Qualcomm's QCS8300-AC variant SoC.
Monaco-ac-sku EVK board is a single board computer (SBC) that supports various
industrial applications, including factory automation, industrial
robots, drones, edge AI boxes, machine vision, autonomous mobile
robots (AMRs), and industrial gateways.
Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Drop keyword "sku" from the compatible string of board bindings
- Krzysztof.
- Wrap commit text of dt-bindings change based on upstream guidelines
- Krzysztof.
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260328-monaco-evk-ac-sku-v1-0-79d166fa5571@oss.qualcomm.com
---
Umang Chheda (2):
dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support
arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: Add monaco-ac EVK board
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ac-sku.dts | 730 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 732 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 3b058d1aeeeff27a7289529c4944291613b364e9
change-id: 20260328-monaco-evk-ac-sku-6d66f965335c
Best regards,
--
Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-03-31 18:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce support for Monaco-ac-sku Evaluation Kit Umang Chheda @ 2026-03-31 18:44 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-01 7:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2026-04-01 11:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: Add monaco-ac EVK board Umang Chheda 1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Umang Chheda @ 2026-03-31 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran Cc: linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, Umang Chheda, netdev Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: - enum: - arduino,monza - qcom,monaco-evk + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac - qcom,qcs8300-ride - const: qcom,qcs8300 -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-01 7:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2026-04-01 11:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2026-04-01 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Umang Chheda Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: > Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is > based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. > > Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> Best regards, Krzysztof ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support Umang Chheda 2026-04-01 7:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2026-04-01 11:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2026-04-03 10:44 ` Umang Chheda 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-04-01 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Umang Chheda Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: > Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is > based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. If it is a different SoC SKU, should it be reflected in the SoC compat strings? > > Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: > - enum: > - arduino,monza > - qcom,monaco-evk > + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac > - qcom,qcs8300-ride > - const: qcom,qcs8300 > > > -- > 2.34.1 > -- With best wishes Dmitry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-04-01 11:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-04-03 10:44 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-03 20:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-03 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev Hello Dmitry, On 4/1/2026 5:06 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >> Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is >> based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. > > If it is a different SoC SKU, should it be reflected in the SoC compat > strings? Monaco‑AC does not introduce any S/W differences compared to Monaco SoC -- All IP blocks and bindings remain identical from S/W PoV, Hence haven't included the SoC SKU in the SoC compat strings. Hope this is okay ? Your view on this ? > >> >> Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >> index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >> @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: >> - enum: >> - arduino,monza >> - qcom,monaco-evk >> + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac >> - qcom,qcs8300-ride >> - const: qcom,qcs8300 >> >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > Thanks, Umang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-04-03 10:44 ` Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-03 20:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2026-04-04 10:45 ` Umang Chheda 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-04-03 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Umang Chheda Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 04:14:28PM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: > Hello Dmitry, > > On 4/1/2026 5:06 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: > >> Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is > >> based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. > > > > If it is a different SoC SKU, should it be reflected in the SoC compat > > strings? > > Monaco‑AC does not introduce any S/W differences compared to Monaco SoC > -- All IP blocks and bindings remain identical from S/W PoV, Hence > haven't included the SoC SKU in the SoC compat strings. > > Hope this is okay ? Your view on this ? You are descibing -AC as the main difference between the kits, but then you say that -AC doesn't bring new software interfaces. What is the difference then between monako-evk and the -ac variant? Also, from the naming point of view, it is monako-ac-evk, not the other way. > > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >> index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >> @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: > >> - enum: > >> - arduino,monza > >> - qcom,monaco-evk > >> + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac > >> - qcom,qcs8300-ride > >> - const: qcom,qcs8300 > >> > >> > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > >> > > > > Thanks, > Umang -- With best wishes Dmitry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-04-03 20:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-04-04 10:45 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-04 11:12 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-04 19:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-04 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev On 4/4/2026 1:58 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 04:14:28PM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >> Hello Dmitry, >> >> On 4/1/2026 5:06 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >>>> Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is >>>> based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. >>> >>> If it is a different SoC SKU, should it be reflected in the SoC compat >>> strings? >> >> Monaco‑AC does not introduce any S/W differences compared to Monaco SoC >> -- All IP blocks and bindings remain identical from S/W PoV, Hence >> haven't included the SoC SKU in the SoC compat strings. >> >> Hope this is okay ? Your view on this ? > > You are descibing -AC as the main difference between the kits, but then > you say that -AC doesn't bring new software interfaces. What is the > difference then between monako-evk and the -ac variant? > The major difference between monaco-evk and monaco-ac-evk boards is that of power grid. monaco-evk requires 4 PMICs (2x PM8650AU + Maxim MAX20018 + TI TPS6594) to support higher power requirements of monaco-AA variant of SoC which supports upto 40 TOPS of NPU - whereas this board "monaco-ac-evk" supports 20 TOPS of NPU and has lesser power requirements hence 2 PMICs suffice the power requirements (2x PM8650AU). > Also, from the naming point of view, it is monako-ac-evk, not the other > way. Ack, will change this to "monaco-ac-evk" in the next version. Also, should I change DT name "monaco-ac-sku.dts" instead of current "monaco-evk-ac-sku" ? > >> >>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>> index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>> @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: >>>> - enum: >>>> - arduino,monza >>>> - qcom,monaco-evk >>>> + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac >>>> - qcom,qcs8300-ride >>>> - const: qcom,qcs8300 >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 2.34.1 >>>> >>> >> >> Thanks, >> Umang > Thanks, Umang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-04-04 10:45 ` Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-04 11:12 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-04 19:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-04 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev, umang.chheda On 4/4/2026 4:15 PM, Umang Chheda wrote: > > > On 4/4/2026 1:58 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 04:14:28PM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >>> Hello Dmitry, >>> >>> On 4/1/2026 5:06 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >>>>> Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is >>>>> based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. >>>> >>>> If it is a different SoC SKU, should it be reflected in the SoC compat >>>> strings? >>> >>> Monaco‑AC does not introduce any S/W differences compared to Monaco SoC >>> -- All IP blocks and bindings remain identical from S/W PoV, Hence >>> haven't included the SoC SKU in the SoC compat strings. >>> >>> Hope this is okay ? Your view on this ? >> >> You are descibing -AC as the main difference between the kits, but then >> you say that -AC doesn't bring new software interfaces. What is the >> difference then between monako-evk and the -ac variant? >> > > The major difference between monaco-evk and monaco-ac-evk boards is that > of power grid. monaco-evk requires 4 PMICs (2x PM8650AU + Maxim MAX20018 > + TI TPS6594) to support higher power requirements of monaco-AA variant > of SoC which supports upto 40 TOPS of NPU - whereas this board > "monaco-ac-evk" supports 20 TOPS of NPU and has lesser power > requirements hence 2 PMICs suffice the power requirements (2x PM8650AU). > > >> Also, from the naming point of view, it is monako-ac-evk, not the other >> way. > > Ack, will change this to "monaco-ac-evk" in the next version. > > Also, should I change DT name "monaco-ac-evk.dts" instead of current > "monaco-evk-ac-sku" ? Corrected Typo - I meant change DT name to "monaco-ac-evk.dts" and drop "sku" from the DT name as well ? > >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>>> index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>>> @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: >>>>> - enum: >>>>> - arduino,monza >>>>> - qcom,monaco-evk >>>>> + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac >>>>> - qcom,qcs8300-ride >>>>> - const: qcom,qcs8300 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> 2.34.1 >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Umang >> > > Thanks, > Umang Thanks, Umang > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-04-04 10:45 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-04 11:12 ` Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-04 19:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2026-04-06 11:58 ` Umang Chheda 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-04-04 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Umang Chheda Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 04:15:54PM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: > > > On 4/4/2026 1:58 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 04:14:28PM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: > >> Hello Dmitry, > >> > >> On 4/1/2026 5:06 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: > >>>> Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is > >>>> based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. > >>> > >>> If it is a different SoC SKU, should it be reflected in the SoC compat > >>> strings? > >> > >> Monaco‑AC does not introduce any S/W differences compared to Monaco SoC > >> -- All IP blocks and bindings remain identical from S/W PoV, Hence > >> haven't included the SoC SKU in the SoC compat strings. > >> > >> Hope this is okay ? Your view on this ? > > > > You are descibing -AC as the main difference between the kits, but then > > you say that -AC doesn't bring new software interfaces. What is the > > difference then between monako-evk and the -ac variant? > > > > The major difference between monaco-evk and monaco-ac-evk boards is that > of power grid. monaco-evk requires 4 PMICs (2x PM8650AU + Maxim MAX20018 > + TI TPS6594) to support higher power requirements of monaco-AA variant > of SoC which supports upto 40 TOPS of NPU - whereas this board > "monaco-ac-evk" supports 20 TOPS of NPU and has lesser power > requirements hence 2 PMICs suffice the power requirements (2x PM8650AU). Is that the only difference? Is the PCB the same? Should we have a single common file for those two variants? > > > > Also, from the naming point of view, it is monako-ac-evk, not the other > > way. > > Ack, will change this to "monaco-ac-evk" in the next version. > > Also, should I change DT name "monaco-ac-sku.dts" instead of current > "monaco-evk-ac-sku" ? monako-ac-evk.dtsi. > > > > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >>>> index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 > >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >>>> @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: > >>>> - enum: > >>>> - arduino,monza > >>>> - qcom,monaco-evk > >>>> + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac > >>>> - qcom,qcs8300-ride > >>>> - const: qcom,qcs8300 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> 2.34.1 > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Umang > > > > Thanks, > Umang > > -- With best wishes Dmitry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support 2026-04-04 19:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-04-06 11:58 ` Umang Chheda 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Umang Chheda @ 2026-04-06 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, netdev On 4/5/2026 1:09 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 04:15:54PM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >> >> >> On 4/4/2026 1:58 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 04:14:28PM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >>>> Hello Dmitry, >>>> >>>> On 4/1/2026 5:06 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:14:42AM +0530, Umang Chheda wrote: >>>>>> Introduce bindings for the monaco-evk-ac IoT board, which is >>>>>> based on the monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) SoC variant. >>>>> >>>>> If it is a different SoC SKU, should it be reflected in the SoC compat >>>>> strings? >>>> >>>> Monaco‑AC does not introduce any S/W differences compared to Monaco SoC >>>> -- All IP blocks and bindings remain identical from S/W PoV, Hence >>>> haven't included the SoC SKU in the SoC compat strings. >>>> >>>> Hope this is okay ? Your view on this ? >>> >>> You are descibing -AC as the main difference between the kits, but then >>> you say that -AC doesn't bring new software interfaces. What is the >>> difference then between monako-evk and the -ac variant? >>> >> >> The major difference between monaco-evk and monaco-ac-evk boards is that >> of power grid. monaco-evk requires 4 PMICs (2x PM8650AU + Maxim MAX20018 >> + TI TPS6594) to support higher power requirements of monaco-AA variant >> of SoC which supports upto 40 TOPS of NPU - whereas this board >> "monaco-ac-evk" supports 20 TOPS of NPU and has lesser power >> requirements hence 2 PMICs suffice the power requirements (2x PM8650AU). > > Is that the only difference? Is the PCB the same? Should we have a > single common file for those two variants? Yes, the major differences b/w 2 boards are: 1. Monaco-AA version of SoC in monaco-evk v/s Monaco-AC version of SoC in monaco-ac-evk board. 2. 4 PMICs (2x PM8650AU + Maxim MAX20018 + TI TPS6594) in monaco-evk board v/s 2 PMICs (2x PM8650AU) in monaco-ac-evk board. PCB is different for both of the boards. Can I restructure as below to avoid code duplication ? "monaco-evk-common.dtsi" --> This will add/enable all the common peripherals of monaco-evk and monaco-ac-evk. monaco-evk.dts --> Include "monaco-evk-common.dtsi" and enable monaco-evk specific changes. monaco-ac-evk.dts --> Include "monaco-evk-common.dtsi" and enable monaco-ac specific changes Does the above file re-structuring looks good ? > >> >> >>> Also, from the naming point of view, it is monako-ac-evk, not the other >>> way. >> >> Ack, will change this to "monaco-ac-evk" in the next version. >> >> Also, should I change DT name "monaco-ac-sku.dts" instead of current >> "monaco-evk-ac-sku" ? > > monako-ac-evk.dtsi. > >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>>>> index ca880c105f3b..c76365a89687 100644 >>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>>>> @@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ properties: >>>>>> - enum: >>>>>> - arduino,monza >>>>>> - qcom,monaco-evk >>>>>> + - qcom,monaco-evk-ac >>>>>> - qcom,qcs8300-ride >>>>>> - const: qcom,qcs8300 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.34.1 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Umang >>> >> >> Thanks, >> Umang >> >> > Thanks, Umang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: Add monaco-ac EVK board 2026-03-31 18:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce support for Monaco-ac-sku Evaluation Kit Umang Chheda 2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support Umang Chheda @ 2026-03-31 18:44 ` Umang Chheda 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Umang Chheda @ 2026-03-31 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Richard Cochran Cc: linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel, Umang Chheda, netdev, Faruque Ansari Add initial device tree support for monaco-ac EVK board, based on Qualcomm's monaco-ac (QCS8300-AC) variant SoC. monaco-ac EVK is single board supporting these peripherals : - Storage: 1 × 128 GB UFS, micro-SD card, EEPROMs for MACs, and eMMC. - Audio/Video, Camera & Display ports. - Connectivity: RJ45 2.5GbE, WLAN/Bluetooth, CAN/CAN-FD. - PCIe ports. - USB & UART ports. Compared to "monaco-evk" variant, which utilizes higher tier QCS8300-AA SKU (supporting 40 TOPS of NPU) and a 4-PMIC (2x PM8650AU + Maxim MAX20018 + TI TPS6594) power delivery network (PDN) to support higher power requirement. This board utilizes lower tier QCS8300-AC SKU (Supporting 20 TOPS of NPU) and a simplified 2 PMIC(2x PM8650AU) PDN. Add support for the following components : - GPI (Generic Peripheral Interface) and QUPv3-0/1 controllers to facilitate DMA and peripheral communication. - TCA9534 I/O expander via I2C to provide 8 additional GPIO lines for extended I/O functionality. - USB1 controller routed to a TypeC connector in device mode to support USB peripheral operations. - Remoteproc subsystems for supported DSPs such as Audio DSP, Compute DSP and Generic DSP, along with their corresponding firmware. - Configure nvmem-layout on the I2C EEPROM to store data for Ethernet and other consumers. - QCA8081 2.5G Ethernet PHY on port-0 and expose the Ethernet MAC address via nvmem for network configuration. It depends on CONFIG_QCA808X_PHY to use QCA8081 PHY. - Support for the Iris video decoder, including the required firmware, to enable video decoding capabilities. - PCIe0 and PCIe1 controller and phy-nodes. - Sound card and max98357a based I2S speaker amplifier. Written with inputs from: Nirmesh Kumar Singh <nirmesh.singh@oss.qualcomm.com> - GPIO Expander. Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com> - GPI/QUP. Mohd Ayaan Anwar <mohd.anwar@oss.qualcomm.com> - Ethernet. Monish Chunara <monish.chunara@oss.qualcomm.com> - EEPROM. Swati Agarwal <swati.agarwal@oss.qualcomm.com> - USB. Sushrut Shree Trivedi <sushrut.trivedi@oss.qualcomm.com> - PCIe. Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com> - Audio. Co-developed-by: Faruque Ansari <faruque.ansari@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Faruque Ansari <faruque.ansari@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ac-sku.dts | 730 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 731 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile index c46d94bb6dd5..1d8c2a3db6c0 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += mahua-crd.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += milos-fairphone-fp6.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += monaco-arduino-monza.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += monaco-evk.dtb +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += monaco-evk-ac-sku.dtb monaco-evk-camera-imx577-dtbs := monaco-evk.dtb monaco-evk-camera-imx577.dtbo dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += monaco-evk-camera-imx577.dtb diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ac-sku.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ac-sku.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f6294b2a486d --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ac-sku.dts @@ -0,0 +1,730 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause +/* + * Copyright (c) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries. + */ + +/dts-v1/; + +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> +#include <dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h> +#include <dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6afe.h> +#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h> + +#include "monaco.dtsi" +#include "monaco-pmics.dtsi" + +/ { + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Monaco-ac EVK"; + compatible = "qcom,monaco-evk-ac", "qcom,qcs8300"; + + aliases { + ethernet0 = ðernet0; + i2c1 = &i2c1; + serial0 = &uart7; + }; + + chosen { + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; + }; + + dmic: audio-codec-0 { + compatible = "dmic-codec"; + #sound-dai-cells = <0>; + num-channels = <1>; + }; + + max98357a: audio-codec-1 { + compatible = "maxim,max98357a"; + #sound-dai-cells = <0>; + }; + + sound { + compatible = "qcom,qcs8275-sndcard"; + model = "MONACO-EVK"; + + pinctrl-0 = <&hs0_mi2s_active>, <&mi2s1_active>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + + hs0-mi2s-playback-dai-link { + link-name = "HS0 MI2S Playback"; + + codec { + sound-dai = <&max98357a>; + }; + + cpu { + sound-dai = <&q6apmbedai PRIMARY_MI2S_RX>; + }; + + platform { + sound-dai = <&q6apm>; + }; + }; + + sec-mi2s-capture-dai-link { + link-name = "Secondary MI2S Capture"; + + codec { + sound-dai = <&dmic>; + }; + + cpu { + sound-dai = <&q6apmbedai SECONDARY_MI2S_TX>; + }; + + platform { + sound-dai = <&q6apm>; + }; + }; + }; +}; + +&apps_rsc { + regulators-0 { + compatible = "qcom,pmm8654au-rpmh-regulators"; + qcom,pmic-id = "a"; + + vreg_l3a: ldo3 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l3a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l4a: ldo4 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l4a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <880000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <912000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l5a: ldo5 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l5a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l6a: ldo6 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l6a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <880000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <912000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l7a: ldo7 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l7a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <880000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <912000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l8a: ldo8 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l8a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2504000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2960000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l9a: ldo9 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l9a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2970000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3072000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_s4a: smps4 { + regulator-name = "vreg_s4a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_s9a: smps9 { + regulator-name = "vreg_s9a"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1352000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1352000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + }; + + regulators-1 { + compatible = "qcom,pmm8654au-rpmh-regulators"; + qcom,pmic-id = "c"; + + vreg_l1c: ldo1 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l1c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <300000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <500000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l2c: ldo2 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l2c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <904000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l4c: ldo4 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l4c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l6c: ldo6 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l6c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l7c: ldo7 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l7c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l8c: ldo8 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l8c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_l9c: ldo9 { + regulator-name = "vreg_l9c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + regulator-allow-set-load; + regulator-allowed-modes = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM + RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + + vreg_s5c: smps5 { + regulator-name = "vreg_s5c"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1104000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1104000>; + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; + }; + }; +}; + +ðernet0 { + phy-mode = "2500base-x"; + phy-handle = <&hsgmii_phy0>; + + pinctrl-0 = <ðernet0_default>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + + snps,mtl-rx-config = <&mtl_rx_setup>; + snps,mtl-tx-config = <&mtl_tx_setup>; + nvmem-cells = <&mac_addr0>; + nvmem-cell-names = "mac-address"; + + status = "okay"; + + mdio { + compatible = "snps,dwmac-mdio"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + hsgmii_phy0: ethernet-phy@1c { + compatible = "ethernet-phy-id004d.d101"; + reg = <0x1c>; + reset-gpios = <&tlmm 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + reset-assert-us = <11000>; + reset-deassert-us = <70000>; + }; + }; + + mtl_rx_setup: rx-queues-config { + snps,rx-queues-to-use = <4>; + snps,rx-sched-sp; + + queue0 { + snps,dcb-algorithm; + snps,map-to-dma-channel = <0x0>; + snps,route-up; + snps,priority = <0x1>; + }; + + queue1 { + snps,dcb-algorithm; + snps,map-to-dma-channel = <0x1>; + snps,route-ptp; + }; + + queue2 { + snps,avb-algorithm; + snps,map-to-dma-channel = <0x2>; + snps,route-avcp; + }; + + queue3 { + snps,avb-algorithm; + snps,map-to-dma-channel = <0x3>; + snps,priority = <0xc>; + }; + }; + + mtl_tx_setup: tx-queues-config { + snps,tx-queues-to-use = <4>; + + queue0 { + snps,dcb-algorithm; + }; + + queue1 { + snps,dcb-algorithm; + }; + + queue2 { + snps,avb-algorithm; + snps,send_slope = <0x1000>; + snps,idle_slope = <0x1000>; + snps,high_credit = <0x3e800>; + snps,low_credit = <0xffc18000>; + }; + + queue3 { + snps,avb-algorithm; + snps,send_slope = <0x1000>; + snps,idle_slope = <0x1000>; + snps,high_credit = <0x3e800>; + snps,low_credit = <0xffc18000>; + }; + }; +}; + +&gpi_dma0 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&gpi_dma1 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&i2c1 { + pinctrl-0 = <&qup_i2c1_default>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + + status = "okay"; + + fan_controller: fan@18 { + compatible = "ti,amc6821"; + reg = <0x18>; + #pwm-cells = <2>; + + fan { + pwms = <&fan_controller 40000 PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED>; + }; + }; + + eeprom0: eeprom@50 { + compatible = "atmel,24c256"; + reg = <0x50>; + pagesize = <64>; + + nvmem-layout { + compatible = "fixed-layout"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + mac_addr0: mac-addr@0 { + reg = <0x0 0x6>; + }; + }; + }; +}; + +&i2c15 { + pinctrl-0 = <&qup_i2c15_default>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + + status = "okay"; + + expander0: gpio@38 { + compatible = "ti,tca9538"; + reg = <0x38>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + pinctrl-0 = <&expander0_int>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + }; + + expander1: gpio@39 { + compatible = "ti,tca9538"; + reg = <0x39>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + pinctrl-0 = <&expander1_int>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + }; + + expander2: gpio@3a { + compatible = "ti,tca9538"; + reg = <0x3a>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 95 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + pinctrl-0 = <&expander2_int>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + }; + + expander3: gpio@3b { + compatible = "ti,tca9538"; + reg = <0x3b>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + pinctrl-0 = <&expander3_int>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + }; + + expander4: gpio@3c { + compatible = "ti,tca9538"; + reg = <0x3c>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 96 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + pinctrl-0 = <&expander4_int>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + }; + + expander5: gpio@3d { + compatible = "ti,tca9538"; + reg = <0x3d>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + pinctrl-0 = <&expander5_int>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + }; + + expander6: gpio@3e { + compatible = "ti,tca9538"; + reg = <0x3e>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 52 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + pinctrl-0 = <&expander6_int>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + }; +}; + +&iris { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pcie0 { + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie0_default_state>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pcie0_phy { + vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l6a>; + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l5a>; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pcie1 { + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_default_state>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pcie1_phy { + vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l6a>; + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l5a>; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pcieport0 { + reset-gpios = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + wake-gpios = <&tlmm 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; +}; + +&pcieport1 { + reset-gpios = <&tlmm 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + wake-gpios = <&tlmm 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; +}; + +&qupv3_id_0 { + firmware-name = "qcom/qcs8300/qupv3fw.elf"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&qupv3_id_1 { + firmware-name = "qcom/qcs8300/qupv3fw.elf"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&remoteproc_adsp { + firmware-name = "qcom/qcs8300/adsp.mbn"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&remoteproc_cdsp { + firmware-name = "qcom/qcs8300/cdsp0.mbn"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&remoteproc_gpdsp { + firmware-name = "qcom/qcs8300/gpdsp0.mbn"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&serdes0 { + phy-supply = <&vreg_l4a>; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&spi10 { + status = "okay"; + + tpm@0 { + compatible = "st,st33htpm-spi", "tcg,tpm_tis-spi"; + reg = <0>; + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; + }; +}; + +&tlmm { + + pcie0_default_state: pcie0-default-state { + wake-pins { + pins = "gpio0"; + function = "gpio"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + clkreq-pins { + pins = "gpio1"; + function = "pcie0_clkreq"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + perst-pins { + pins = "gpio2"; + function = "gpio"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + }; + + expander5_int: expander5-int-state { + pins = "gpio3"; + function = "gpio"; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + ethernet0_default: ethernet0-default-state { + ethernet0_mdc: ethernet0-mdc-pins { + pins = "gpio5"; + function = "emac0_mdc"; + drive-strength = <16>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + ethernet0_mdio: ethernet0-mdio-pins { + pins = "gpio6"; + function = "emac0_mdio"; + drive-strength = <16>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + }; + + expander1_int: expander1-int-state { + pins = "gpio16"; + function = "gpio"; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + qup_i2c1_default: qup-i2c1-state { + pins = "gpio19", "gpio20"; + function = "qup0_se1"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + qup_i2c1_default: qup-i2c1-state { + pins = "gpio19", "gpio20"; + function = "qup0_se1"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + pcie1_default_state: pcie1-default-state { + wake-pins { + pins = "gpio21"; + function = "gpio"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + clkreq-pins { + pins = "gpio22"; + function = "pcie1_clkreq"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + perst-pins { + pins = "gpio23"; + function = "gpio"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + }; + + expander3_int: expander3-int-state { + pins = "gpio24"; + function = "gpio"; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + expander6_int: expander6-int-state { + pins = "gpio52"; + function = "gpio"; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + expander0_int: expander0-int-state { + pins = "gpio56"; + function = "gpio"; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + qup_i2c15_default: qup-i2c15-state { + pins = "gpio91", "gpio92"; + function = "qup1_se7"; + drive-strength = <2>; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + expander2_int: expander2-int-state { + pins = "gpio95"; + function = "gpio"; + bias-pull-up; + }; + + expander4_int: expander4-int-state { + pins = "gpio96"; + function = "gpio"; + bias-pull-up; + }; +}; + +&uart7 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&ufs_mem_hc { + reset-gpios = <&tlmm 133 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + vcc-supply = <&vreg_l8a>; + vcc-max-microamp = <1100000>; + vccq-supply = <&vreg_l4c>; + vccq-max-microamp = <1200000>; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&ufs_mem_phy { + vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l4a>; + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l5a>; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&usb_1 { + dr_mode = "peripheral"; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&usb_1_hsphy { + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l7a>; + vdda18-supply = <&vreg_l7c>; + vdda33-supply = <&vreg_l9a>; + + status = "okay"; +}; + +&usb_qmpphy { + vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l7a>; + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l5a>; + + status = "okay"; +}; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-06 11:58 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-03-31 18:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce support for Monaco-ac-sku Evaluation Kit Umang Chheda 2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add monaco-evk-ac support Umang Chheda 2026-04-01 7:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2026-04-01 11:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2026-04-03 10:44 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-03 20:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2026-04-04 10:45 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-04 11:12 ` Umang Chheda 2026-04-04 19:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2026-04-06 11:58 ` Umang Chheda 2026-03-31 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: Add monaco-ac EVK board Umang Chheda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox