From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
To: Michael Guntsche <michael.guntsche@it-loops.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [BUG] Bisected Gianfar not receiving any traffic
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:29:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B58E52.1080008@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALG0vJuENcAnrpP1Bbe2-KhV8=oazLn7pMnvC6XTNCYnAMvOhw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
Please provide the model of your board. Commit 6be5ed3fef568
relies on correct indication from H/W for Rx processing, so we
should check whether the right register/mask are being used for
that model or whether there's a missing errata.
One way to confirm this is by checking if Rx processing (and not Tx)
is entered with num_act_queues == 0 (the RXF indication set to 0).
Thanks,
Claudiu
On 6/9/2013 11:28 PM, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> Forwarded to the correct mailing list address.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Guntsche <michael.guntsche@it-loops.com>
> Date: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:26 PM
> Subject: [BUG] Bisected Gianfar not receiving any traffic
> To: linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
>
>
> Good evening,
>
> While testing one of my powerpc based embedded ports I noticed that
> with any 3.10-rc kernel ethernet traffic was dead on my two gianfar
> NICs. The strange thing was that apparetnly outbound broadcasts seemed
> to work since avahi correctly registered the name of the board. I
> bisected it to the following commit.
>
> 6be5ed3fef568 gianfar: Poll only active Rx queues
>
> Reverting this commit on 3.10-rc4 made both gianfar devices work
> again. This is a rather old board so it could be that the register
> that's used here is just plain wrong in my case. A few years ago I had
> a similar issue where the implementation on the board here apparently
> did not work correctly.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131297524825104&w=2
>
> In that case a flag was bogus as well.
> If you need more information or want me to test a patch please add me
> as CC since I am not subscribed to the list.
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael Guntsche
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CALG0vJsttWB4=fDU5yiRdf0rKgp09pY1y1jq5Ug_ra-7M7KQBQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-09 20:28 ` Fwd: [BUG] Bisected Gianfar not receiving any traffic Michael Guntsche
2013-06-10 8:29 ` Claudiu Manoil [this message]
2013-06-10 8:33 ` Michael Guntsche
2013-06-10 10:03 ` Claudiu Manoil
2013-06-10 17:19 ` [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Add backwards compatible Single Queue mode polling Claudiu Manoil
2013-06-10 17:35 ` Michael Guntsche
2013-08-16 11:54 ` Lutz Jaenicke
2013-06-12 10:16 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B58E52.1080008@freescale.com \
--to=claudiu.manoil@freescale.com \
--cc=michael.guntsche@it-loops.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox