* Re: next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929) [not found] <E1bpZhb-0002Oz-OQ@optimist> @ 2016-09-29 18:47 ` Mark Brown 2016-09-29 19:08 ` Vishwanath Pai 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2016-09-29 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vishwanath Pai, Joshua Hunt, Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel, linux-next, netdev, linux-arm-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 454 bytes --] On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: For the past couple of days -next has been failing to build an ARM allmodconfig due to: > arm-allmodconfig > ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.ko] undefined! which appears to be triggered by 11d5f15723c9 (netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Create revision 2 to support higher pps rates) introducing a division of a 64 bit number which should be done using do_div(). [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929) 2016-09-29 18:47 ` next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929) Mark Brown @ 2016-09-29 19:08 ` Vishwanath Pai 2016-09-29 22:44 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Vishwanath Pai @ 2016-09-29 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown Cc: Joshua Hunt, Pablo Neira Ayuso, kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel, linux-next, netdev, linux-arm-kernel On 09/29/2016 02:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > For the past couple of days -next has been failing to build an ARM > allmodconfig due to: > >> arm-allmodconfig >> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.ko] undefined! > > which appears to be triggered by 11d5f15723c9 (netfilter: xt_hashlimit: > Create revision 2 to support higher pps rates) introducing a division of > a 64 bit number which should be done using do_div(). > I have sent a patch for this a couple of days ago to netdev, it hasn't made it to net-next yet. Here's the latest one: [PATCH net-next v3] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Fix link error in 32bit arch because of 64bit division This should fix the link error. -Vishwanath ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929) 2016-09-29 19:08 ` Vishwanath Pai @ 2016-09-29 22:44 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-09-29 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel-build-reports Cc: Vishwanath Pai, Mark Brown, linaro-kernel, netdev, linux-next, linux-arm-kernel, Joshua Hunt, Pablo Neira Ayuso On Thursday 29 September 2016, Vishwanath Pai wrote: > I have sent a patch for this a couple of days ago to netdev, it hasn't > made it to net-next yet. Here's the latest one: > > [PATCH net-next v3] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Fix link error in 32bit > arch because of 64bit division > > This should fix the link error. I also did a patch (not submitted yet), but my solution used 32-bit math for the version 1 case. I think that would be better so we don't slow down 32-bit architectures too much (div_u64_u64 is very slow). Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-29 22:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1bpZhb-0002Oz-OQ@optimist>
2016-09-29 18:47 ` next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929) Mark Brown
2016-09-29 19:08 ` Vishwanath Pai
2016-09-29 22:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox