From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Liang Li <liali@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: fix missing SMA pin initialization in DPLL subsystem
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:33:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72743efe-6f9c-46ba-ab68-87fe988ecb2c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260213141651.2231124-1-poros@redhat.com>
On 2/13/26 3:16 PM, Petr Oros wrote:
> The DPLL SMA/U.FL pin redesign introduced ice_dpll_sw_pin_frequency_get()
> which gates frequency reporting on the pin's active flag. This flag is
> determined by ice_dpll_sw_pins_update() from the PCA9575 GPIO expander
> state. Before the redesign, SMA pins were exposed as direct HW
> input/output pins and ice_dpll_frequency_get() returned the CGU
> frequency unconditionally — the PCA9575 state was never consulted.
>
> The PCA9575 powers on with all outputs high, setting ICE_SMA1_DIR_EN,
> ICE_SMA1_TX_EN, ICE_SMA2_DIR_EN and ICE_SMA2_TX_EN. Nothing in the
> driver writes the register during initialization, so
> ice_dpll_sw_pins_update() sees all pins as inactive and
> ice_dpll_sw_pin_frequency_get() permanently returns 0 Hz for every
> SW pin.
>
> Fix this by writing a default SMA configuration in
> ice_dpll_init_info_sw_pins(): clear all SMA bits, then set SMA1 and
> SMA2 as active inputs (DIR_EN=0) with U.FL1 output and U.FL2 input
> disabled. Each SMA/U.FL pair shares a physical signal path so only
> one pin per pair can be active at a time. U.FL pins still report
> frequency 0 after this fix: U.FL1 (output-only) is disabled by
> ICE_SMA1_TX_EN which keeps the TX output buffer off, and U.FL2
> (input-only) is disabled by ICE_SMA2_UFL2_RX_DIS. They can be
> activated by changing the corresponding SMA pin direction via dpll
> netlink.
>
> Fixes: 2dd5d03c77e2 ("ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control")
> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> index 53b54e395a2ed8..c2ad39bfe177db 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> @@ -3545,6 +3545,7 @@ static int ice_dpll_init_info_sw_pins(struct ice_pf *pf)
> struct ice_dpll_pin *pin;
> u32 phase_adj_max, caps;
> int i, ret;
> + u8 data;
>
> if (pf->hw.device_id == ICE_DEV_ID_E810C_QSFP)
> input_idx_offset = ICE_E810_RCLK_PINS_NUM;
> @@ -3604,6 +3605,22 @@ static int ice_dpll_init_info_sw_pins(struct ice_pf *pf)
> }
> ice_dpll_phase_range_set(&pin->prop.phase_range, phase_adj_max);
> }
> +
> + /* Initialize the SMA control register to a known-good default state.
> + * Without this write the PCA9575 GPIO expander retains its power-on
> + * default (all outputs high) which makes all SW pins appear inactive.
> + * Set SMA1 and SMA2 as active inputs, disable U.FL1 output and
> + * U.FL2 input.
> + */
> + ret = ice_read_sma_ctrl(&pf->hw, &data);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + data &= ~ICE_ALL_SMA_MASK;
> + data |= ICE_SMA1_TX_EN | ICE_SMA2_TX_EN | ICE_SMA2_UFL2_RX_DIS;
> + ret = ice_write_sma_ctrl(&pf->hw, data);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = ice_dpll_pin_state_update(pf, pin, ICE_DPLL_PIN_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
> NULL);
> if (ret)
Good catch... thanks for the quick fix.
Reported-by: Liang Li <liali@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-13 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 14:16 [PATCH net] ice: fix missing SMA pin initialization in DPLL subsystem Petr Oros
2026-02-13 14:33 ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
2026-02-26 13:48 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2026-04-01 16:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
2026-04-08 8:54 ` Petr Oros
2026-04-14 20:13 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72743efe-6f9c-46ba-ab68-87fe988ecb2c@redhat.com \
--to=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liali@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox