From: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
To: "Rinitha, SX" <sx.rinitha@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Vecera, Ivan" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: fix missing SMA pin initialization in DPLL subsystem
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 10:54:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d74a9071-336d-4fec-a061-bf9a3a444678@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA1PR11MB6241B58FF425A8684CFAE7A28B50A@IA1PR11MB6241.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 4/1/26 18:29, Rinitha, SX wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of Petr Oros
>> Sent: 13 February 2026 19:47
>> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Vecera, Ivan <ivecera@redhat.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Kubalewski, Arkadiusz <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>; Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: fix missing SMA pin initialization in DPLL subsystem
>>
>> The DPLL SMA/U.FL pin redesign introduced ice_dpll_sw_pin_frequency_get() which gates frequency reporting on the pin's active flag. This flag is determined by ice_dpll_sw_pins_update() from the PCA9575 GPIO expander state. Before the redesign, SMA pins were exposed as direct HW input/output pins and ice_dpll_frequency_get() returned the CGU frequency unconditionally — the PCA9575 state was never consulted.
>>
>> The PCA9575 powers on with all outputs high, setting ICE_SMA1_DIR_EN, ICE_SMA1_TX_EN, ICE_SMA2_DIR_EN and ICE_SMA2_TX_EN. Nothing in the driver writes the register during initialization, so
>> ice_dpll_sw_pins_update() sees all pins as inactive and
>> ice_dpll_sw_pin_frequency_get() permanently returns 0 Hz for every SW pin.
>>
>> Fix this by writing a default SMA configuration in
>> ice_dpll_init_info_sw_pins(): clear all SMA bits, then set SMA1 and
>> SMA2 as active inputs (DIR_EN=0) with U.FL1 output and U.FL2 input disabled. Each SMA/U.FL pair shares a physical signal path so only one pin per pair can be active at a time. U.FL pins still report frequency 0 after this fix: U.FL1 (output-only) is disabled by ICE_SMA1_TX_EN which keeps the TX output buffer off, and U.FL2
>> (input-only) is disabled by ICE_SMA2_UFL2_RX_DIS. They can be activated by changing the corresponding SMA pin direction via dpll netlink.
>>
>> Fixes: 2dd5d03c77e2 ("ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control")
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
> When SMA1 is changed from output to input , U.FL1 (input) is expected to get connected but is still disconnected
> Similary, when SMA2 is changed from input to output , U.FL2 (output) is still disconnected
Hi Rinitha,
Thanks for testing this.
The initialization patch itself is correct. After boot, the PCA9575
register is written to a known-good default state and SMA1/SMA2
properly report as active inputs with the expected frequency.
The behavior you describe (U.FL1/U.FL2 staying disconnected after
SMA direction change) is a pre-existing issue in
ice_dpll_sma_direction_set(), not in the initialization path.
I am addressing this in v2 of "[PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix U.FL pin
state set affecting paired SMA pin" with an expanded scope that
covers both directions of the SMA/U.FL pairing.
Is it OK like this?
Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 14:16 [PATCH net] ice: fix missing SMA pin initialization in DPLL subsystem Petr Oros
2026-02-13 14:33 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-02-26 13:48 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2026-04-01 16:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rinitha, SX
2026-04-08 8:54 ` Petr Oros [this message]
2026-04-14 20:13 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d74a9071-336d-4fec-a061-bf9a3a444678@redhat.com \
--to=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sx.rinitha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox