From: Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after connect timeout
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:34:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78225425-1ca7-45fb-85cb-9e04f489e68f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <al3UuvBhfxp82krV@sgarzare-redhat>
On 7/20/2026 4:17 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 05:57:47AM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
>> After vsock_connect() exits the wait loop due to sk->sk_err being
>> set, the error was read but not cleared. This left sk->sk_err set
>> for subsequent operations.
>
> So, is this a fix? If yes, we should put a Fixes tag.
>
> Also, can you describe how to trigger the issue?
>
> Because I see this in vsock_connect(), so I thought it was in some way
> already handled:
>
> /* sk_err might have been set as a result of an earlier
> * (failed) connect attempt.
> */
> sk->sk_err = 0;
>
This only handles the case where the function following the failed
connect is another connect() call.
>> Switch to sock_error() which atomically reads and clears sk->sk_err,
>> so the error is consumed when returned.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
> Can you explain how this patch fixes that issue?
> (this should be the first information to be put in the commit message IMHO)
>
> I'd like to understand better if this is a fix of real bug or just an
> improvement to the code (which is fine by me).
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
Here are the steps of the syzkaller reproducer:
r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT})
connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT})
listen(r0, backlog)
r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT})
connect(r0 -> self) -> -1, EPROTO
listen(r0) -> 0
connect(r1 -> r0) -> 0
accept(r0) -> -1, EPROTO
Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after
binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back to
r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it to be
incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The unexpected
packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO.
After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This listen()
call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never inspects or
clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a normal client and
connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this incoming connection
because the listener's sk_err still holds the EPROTO error from the
earlier failed self-connect.
This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to
never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport
implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket
This patch will prevent the rejection branch to occur in this scenario.
I think we might schedule the cleanup worker to run in the rejection
path for these transports as well.
Thanks,
Phi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 21:57 [PATCH] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after connect timeout Nguyen Dinh Phi
2026-07-20 8:17 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-07-20 17:34 ` Phi Nguyen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78225425-1ca7-45fb-85cb-9e04f489e68f@gmail.com \
--to=phind.uet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox