Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after connect timeout
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:34:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78225425-1ca7-45fb-85cb-9e04f489e68f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <al3UuvBhfxp82krV@sgarzare-redhat>

On 7/20/2026 4:17 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 05:57:47AM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
>> After vsock_connect() exits the wait loop due to sk->sk_err being
>> set, the error was read but not cleared. This left sk->sk_err set
>> for subsequent operations.
> 
> So, is this a fix? If yes, we should put a Fixes tag.
> 
> Also, can you describe how to trigger the issue?
> 
> Because I see this in vsock_connect(), so I thought it was in some way 
> already handled:
> 
>          /* sk_err might have been set as a result of an earlier
>           * (failed) connect attempt.
>           */
>          sk->sk_err = 0;
> 
This only handles the case where the function following the failed 
connect is another connect() call.

>> Switch to sock_error() which atomically reads and clears sk->sk_err,
>> so the error is consumed when returned.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> Can you explain how this patch fixes that issue?
> (this should be the first information to be put in the commit message IMHO)
> 
> I'd like to understand better if this is a fix of real bug or just an 
> improvement to the code (which is fine by me).
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
> 
Here are the steps of the syzkaller reproducer:

   r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) 

   bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT}) 

   connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) 

   listen(r0, backlog)
  

   r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) 

   connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT})

   connect(r0 -> self) -> -1, EPROTO 

   listen(r0)          -> 0 

   connect(r1 -> r0)   -> 0 

   accept(r0)          -> -1, EPROTO

Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after 
binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back to 
r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it to be 
incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The unexpected 
packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO.

After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This listen() 
call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never inspects or 
clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a normal client and 
connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this incoming connection 
because the listener's sk_err still holds the EPROTO error from the 
earlier failed self-connect.

This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to 
never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport 
implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket
This patch will prevent the rejection branch to occur in this scenario.

I think we might schedule the cleanup worker to run in the rejection 
path for these transports as well.

Thanks,
Phi

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-19 21:57 [PATCH] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after connect timeout Nguyen Dinh Phi
2026-07-20  8:17 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-07-20 17:34   ` Phi Nguyen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78225425-1ca7-45fb-85cb-9e04f489e68f@gmail.com \
    --to=phind.uet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox