From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after connect timeout
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:17:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <al3UuvBhfxp82krV@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719220103.684489-1-phind.uet@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 05:57:47AM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
>After vsock_connect() exits the wait loop due to sk->sk_err being
>set, the error was read but not cleared. This left sk->sk_err set
>for subsequent operations.
So, is this a fix? If yes, we should put a Fixes tag.
Also, can you describe how to trigger the issue?
Because I see this in vsock_connect(), so I thought it was in some way
already handled:
/* sk_err might have been set as a result of an earlier
* (failed) connect attempt.
*/
sk->sk_err = 0;
>Switch to sock_error() which atomically reads and clears sk->sk_err,
>so the error is consumed when returned.
>
>Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
>Reported-by: syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Can you explain how this patch fixes that issue?
(this should be the first information to be put in the commit message
IMHO)
I'd like to understand better if this is a fix of real bug or just an
improvement to the code (which is fine by me).
Thanks,
Stefano
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 622dbd046799..43eddc33ed12 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -1847,14 +1847,11 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
> prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> }
>
>- if (sk->sk_err) {
>- err = -sk->sk_err;
>+ err = sock_error(sk);
>+ if (err) {
> sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
> sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
>- } else {
>- err = 0;
> }
>-
> out_wait:
> finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> out:
>--
>2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 21:57 [PATCH] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after connect timeout Nguyen Dinh Phi
2026-07-20 8:17 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-07-20 17:34 ` Phi Nguyen
2026-07-22 7:55 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=al3UuvBhfxp82krV@sgarzare-redhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phind.uet@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox