Re: [PATCH net-next] tc-testing: add selftests for 'bpf' action

[Roman Mashak <mrv@mojatatu.com>]

Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> writes:

> Test d959: Add cBPF action with valid bytecode
> Test f84a: Add cBPF action with invalid bytecode
> Test e939: Add eBPF action with valid object-file
> Test d819: Replace cBPF bytecode and action control
> Test 6ae3: Delete cBPF action
> Test 3e0d: List cBPF actions
> Test 55ce: Flush BPF actions
> Test ccc3: Add cBPF action with duplicate index
>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 215 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0295a63dd0c8

[...]

Davide, thank you for efforts. Please also add a test for testing max
index value (since it is u32 type) and a test with cookie (every action
may have optional 128-bit value, that carries some user state and not
intepreted by the kernel).