From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Matt Johnston <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Make skb_ext_put_sp() idempotent
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:51:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ld9k2oaq.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901171520.072acdd2@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Tue, 1 Sep 2026 17:15:20 -0700")
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 05:15 PM -07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:27:38 +0200 Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> + if (!sp->len)
>> + return;
>
> Somewhat mixed feelings about explicitly checking what is the loop
> bound, anyway. But I guess you can argue we shouldn't write len?
> Probably not worth a respin either way
You read my mind. Then I thought maybe I'm trying to be smarter than the
compiler? But it seems that neither clang nor gcc eliminate the write:
https://godbolt.org/z/EcWTdEYqh
>
>> for (i = 0; i < sp->len; i++)
>> xfrm_state_put(sp->xvec[i]);
>> + sp->len = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 6:27 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: Prepare skb extensions for reuse across scrubs Jakub Sitnicki
2026-08-31 6:27 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Make skb_ext_put_sp() idempotent Jakub Sitnicki
2026-09-02 0:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-02 5:51 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2026-09-02 9:24 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-02 14:03 ` Florian Westphal
2026-08-31 6:27 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: Make skb_ext_put_mctp() idempotent Jakub Sitnicki
2026-09-01 5:26 ` Jeremy Kerr
2026-09-02 0:36 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: Prepare skb extensions for reuse across scrubs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ld9k2oaq.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox