From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: do not send arp replies if src and target hw addr is the same
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:14:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88e2f7747f9692d1585d84a4c75a46590b9e76c9.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5d1e7da-0b90-45d7-b7ab-75ce2ef79208@nbd.name>
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 12:58 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 09.01.24 12:36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 15:25 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > > There are broken devices in the wild that handle duplicate IP address
> > > detection by sending out ARP requests for the IP that they received from a
> > > DHCP server and refuse the address if they get a reply.
> > > When proxyarp is enabled, they would go into a loop of requesting an address
> > > and then NAKing it again.
> >
> > Can you instead provide the same functionality with some nft/tc
> > ingress/ebpf filter?
> >
> > I feel uneasy to hard code this kind of policy, even if it looks
> > sensible. I suspect it could break some other currently working weird
> > device behavior.
> >
> > Otherwise it could be nice provide some arpfilter flag to
> > enable/disable this kind filtering.
>
> I don't see how it could break anything,
FTR, I don't either. But I've been surprised too much times from
extremely weird expectations from random devices, broken by "obviously
correct" behaviors change.
> because it wouldn't suppress
> non-proxied responses. nft/arpfilter is just too expensive, and I don't
> think it makes sense to force the use of tc filters to suppress
> nonsensical responses generated by the bridge layer.
Then what about adding a flag to enable/disable this new behavior?
Cheers,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-09 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 14:25 [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: do not send arp replies if src and target hw addr is the same Felix Fietkau
2024-01-09 11:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-01-09 11:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2024-01-09 12:02 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-01-09 12:41 ` Felix Fietkau
2024-01-09 12:14 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-01-09 12:18 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-01-09 12:49 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88e2f7747f9692d1585d84a4c75a46590b9e76c9.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox