Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"Marek Behún" <marek.behun@nic.cz>,
	"Russell King" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Chris Healy" <cphealy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: avoid error message on remove from VLAN 0
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 09:44:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d5070ac-1f31-cff0-5a5b-2134c7894b3f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531103105.GE23464@t480s.localdomain>

On 5/31/19 7:31 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
> 
> On Fri, 31 May 2019 10:35:14 +0300, Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
>> When non-bridged, non-vlan'ed mv88e6xxx port is moving down, error
>> message is logged:
>>
>> failed to kill vid 0081/0 for device eth_cu_1000_4
>>
>> This is caused by call from __vlan_vid_del() with vin set to zero, over
>> call chain this results into _mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_del() called with
>> vid=0, and mv88e6xxx_vtu_get() called from there returns -EINVAL.
>>
>> On symmetric path moving port up, call goes through
>> mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_prepare() that calls mv88e6xxx_port_check_hw_vlan()
>> that returns -EOPNOTSUPP for zero vid.
>>
>> This patch changes mv88e6xxx_vtu_get() to also return -EOPNOTSUPP for
>> zero vid, then this error code is explicitly cleared in
>> dsa_slave_vlan_rx_kill_vid() and error message is no longer logged.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
>> index 28414db979b0..6b77fde5f0e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
>> @@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u16 vid,
>>  	int err;
>>  
>>  	if (!vid)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>  
>>  	entry->vid = vid - 1;
>>  	entry->valid = false;
> 
> I'm not sure that I like the semantic of it, because the driver can actually
> support VID 0 per-se, only the kernel does not use VLAN 0. Thus I would avoid
> calling the port_vlan_del() ops for VID 0, directly into the upper DSA layer.
> 
> Florian, Andrew, wouldn't the following patch be more adequate?

See my comment about the usage of VLAN ID == 0 with non mv88e6xxx
switches this would break VLAN filtering/isolation for non bridged port.

> 
>     diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
>     index 1e2ae9d59b88..80f228258a92 100644
>     --- a/net/dsa/slave.c
>     +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
>     @@ -1063,6 +1063,10 @@ static int dsa_slave_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto,
>             struct bridge_vlan_info info;
>             int ret;
>      
>     +       /* VID 0 has a special meaning and is never programmed in hardware */
>     +       if (!vid)
>     +               return 0;
>     +
>             /* Check for a possible bridge VLAN entry now since there is no
>              * need to emulate the switchdev prepare + commit phase.
>              */
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Vivien
> 


-- 
Florian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-31 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-31  7:35 [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: avoid error message on remove from VLAN 0 Nikita Yushchenko
2019-05-31 14:31 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-31 14:37   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-31 14:46     ` Nikita Yushchenko
2019-05-31 15:00       ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-31 15:02         ` Nikita Yushchenko
2019-05-31 16:36         ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-31 18:19           ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-31 19:33             ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-31 16:34     ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-31 20:14       ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-31 16:44   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2019-05-31 20:15 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-06-02 20:54 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-31  7:27 Nikita Yushchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d5070ac-1f31-cff0-5a5b-2134c7894b3f@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=cphealy@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox