From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel@riscstar.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>, Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net: stmmac: add tc mqprio hw queue priority offload
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:02:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97bc33f6-1566-4449-9343-9e3463d5b8bf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ase3UrUehtLY6b_5@aspen.lan>
On 10/8/26 17:31, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 12:46:27PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> Implement the offload of the tc mqprio hw queue priority in the stmmac
>> driver. When the mqprio qdisc is configured in channel mode, the MTL TX
>> scheduler is switched to strict priority, and the PSTQX/PSTC priority
>> bitmask of each TX queue is programmed from the set of frame priorities
>> mapped to the owning traffic class (qopt->prio_tc_map).
>>
>> The channel mode offload requires the DCB hw feature and a 1:1 TC to TX
>> queue mapping, with a single queue per TC. Configurations with AVB queues
>> are rejected, since forcing strict priority conflicts with the CBS
>> algorithm. The CBS offload is refused while the strict-priority scheduler
>> is active, and so is a channel count change that would enable an AVB
>> queue.
>
> I don't think these CBS offload checks are necessary. It's quite reasonable
> to mix strict priority on low priority queues with CBS on higher
> priority queues.
>
> In fact on the hardware I have (TC956x) the lower priority queues don't
> implement CBS so mixing AVB and DCB queuing (whether SP or ETS) isn't
> just reasonable, it's pretty much unavoidable when using CBS!
>
> As a concrete example of combining mqprio and CBS, the following works well on
> TC956x (when I tested an older version of your patch):
>
> --- cut here ---
> tc qdisc replace dev eth0 handle 100 parent root mqprio num_tc 4 \
> map 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \
> queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 mode channel hw 1
>
> # No CBS for TxQ1 means we can't offload this (h/ware stays in SP mode)
> tc qdisc replace dev eth0 parent 100:2 handle 102: cbs \
> idleslope 800000 sendslope -1700000 hicredit 494 locredit -1049 \
> offload 0
>
> tc qdisc replace dev eth0 parent 100:3 handle 103: cbs \
> idleslope 400000 sendslope -2100000 hicredit 247 locredit -1296 \
> offload 1
>
> tc qdisc replace dev eth0 parent 100:4 handle 104: cbs \
> idleslope 200000 sendslope -2300000 hicredit 124 locredit -1419 \
> offload 1
> --- cut here ---
Given your later tested-by, I assume you are looking for future possible
improvement?
Also it's not clear which revision you are referring to: AFAICS this
patch is (attempting to) refusing CBS + SP since v1?!?
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 10:46 [PATCH net-next v5 0/3] net: stmmac: Introduce hw queue priority offload Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-06 10:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net: stmmac: set real_num_tx_queues to max(offset + count) Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-06 10:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] net: stmmac: align real_num_tx_queues to mqprio configuration Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-06 10:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net: stmmac: add tc mqprio hw queue priority offload Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-08 15:31 ` Daniel Thompson
2026-10-12 17:02 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-10-12 21:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-13 10:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2026-10-06 10:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/3] net: stmmac: Introduce " netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-06 12:21 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-06 16:18 ` Daniel Thompson
2026-10-12 17:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97bc33f6-1566-4449-9343-9e3463d5b8bf@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=0x1207@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@riscstar.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox