From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, jiri@resnulli.us
Cc: mkubecek@suse.cz, andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@netronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] ethtool: hold a reference to the netdevice around devlink compat
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:09:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97be3163-b167-edf4-fd16-be35dc68fa25@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222195410.9494-3-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
On 2/22/19 11:54 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> When calling into devlink compat code make sure we have a reference
> on the netdevice on which the operation was invoked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> ---
> net/core/ethtool.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
> index 1320e8dce559..6832476dfcaf 100644
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
> @@ -805,11 +805,14 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev,
> if (ops->get_eeprom_len)
> info.eedump_len = ops->get_eeprom_len(dev);
>
> - rtnl_unlock();
> - if (!info.fw_version[0])
> + if (!info.fw_version[0]) {
> + dev_hold(dev);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> devlink_compat_running_version(dev, info.fw_version,
> sizeof(info.fw_version));
> - rtnl_lock();
> + rtnl_lock();
> + dev_put(dev);
> + }
Would it make sense to make the locking and reference holding implicit
within the compat versions of devlink_* because they use a net_device ->
devlink object manipulation as opposed to doing in the caller. We are
more or less guaranteed that the compatibility layer is used from within
ethtool.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-22 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-22 19:54 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] devlink: make ethtool compat reliable Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-22 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net: devlink: turn devlink into a built-in Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-22 20:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-22 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] ethtool: hold a reference to the netdevice around devlink compat Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-22 20:09 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2019-02-22 21:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-22 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] devlink: create a special NDO for getting the devlink instance Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-22 20:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-22 20:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-22 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] nfp: add .ndo_get_devlink Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-22 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] nfp: remove ethtool flashing fallback Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97be3163-b167-edf4-fd16-be35dc68fa25@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox