From: Rongguang Wei <clementwei90@163.com>
To: "Jagielski, Jedrzej" <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] e1000: Initialize phy_data to avoid unexpected values
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:40:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d3dfe98-676f-4a85-9e85-241f79ecfaea@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB590263784927AAB47EE558BAF0182@PH0PR11MB5902.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
在 2026/6/12 16:58, Jagielski, Jedrzej 写道:
> From: Rongguang Wei <clementwei90@163.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2026 10:04 AM
>
>> From: Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> The phy_data variable is not initialized. If e1000_read_phy_reg
>> returns an error, phy_data will not point to a valid value from
>> the PHY register, which may cause the regs_buff array to be populated
>> with unexpected values.
>
> Hi,
>
> Sounds like a fix, but i believe we would like to have any real
> scenario when the issue occurs and how it can be reproduced.
> If such is provided please target the patch against net tree and
> add fixes tag.
>
Hi,
I was not face a real scenario. I just found out there is no check for
e1000_read_phy_reg return value when I reading the driver code.
Maybe is better to initialized the value or check the return value of e1000_read_phy_reg.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>
>> Change-Id: I46071b3b21a566f8da650168d38d6968251b077d
>
>
> i doubt this is a correct kernel commit tag
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
>> index 4dcbeabb3ad2..f068108c5004 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
>> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static void e1000_get_regs(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_regs *regs,
>> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>> u32 *regs_buff = p;
>> - u16 phy_data;
>> + u16 phy_data = 0;
>>
>> memset(p, 0, E1000_REGS_LEN * sizeof(u32));
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 8:03 [PATCH net-next v1] e1000: Initialize phy_data to avoid unexpected values Rongguang Wei
2026-06-12 8:58 ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-15 1:40 ` Rongguang Wei [this message]
2026-06-12 19:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-15 1:28 ` Rongguang Wei
2026-06-15 11:24 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d3dfe98-676f-4a85-9e85-241f79ecfaea@163.com \
--to=clementwei90@163.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=weirongguang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox