From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Sechang Lim" <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: "Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Cong Wang" <cwang@multikernel.io>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix integer overflow in bpf_msg_pop_data() bounds check
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:35:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJ5JTZ788GDY.FXAAY47YDG3N@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610081218.506709-2-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
On Wed Jun 10, 2026 at 1:11 AM PDT, Sechang Lim wrote:
> start and len are u32, so
>
> u64 last = start + len;
>
> evaluates start + len in 32-bit and wraps before storing it in last.
> The bounds check
>
> if (start >= offset + l || last > msg->sg.size)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> can then be passed with an out-of-range start/len, after which the pop
> loop runs off the end of the scatterlist and sk_msg_shift_left() calls
> put_page() on the empty msg->sg.end slot:
>
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> 0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]
> RIP: 0010:sk_msg_shift_left net/core/filter.c:2957 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:____bpf_msg_pop_data net/core/filter.c:3103 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:bpf_msg_pop_data+0x753/0x1a10 net/core/filter.c:2984
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> bpf_prog_4cc92c278f4d5d56+0x1b1/0x1e8
> bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu+0x107/0x320 include/linux/filter.h:746
> sk_psock_msg_verdict+0x357/0x7f0 net/core/skmsg.c:934
> tcp_bpf_send_verdict net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:420 [inline]
> tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x766/0x1ae0 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:583
> __sock_sendmsg+0x153/0x1c0 net/socket.c:802
> __sys_sendto+0x326/0x430 net/socket.c:2265
> __x64_sys_sendto+0xe3/0x100 net/socket.c:2268
> do_syscall_64+0x14c/0x480
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> </TASK>
>
> Widen the addition with a (u64) cast so the bound is evaluated in
> 64-bit and a len near U32_MAX no longer wraps below msg->sg.size.
>
> While here, change pop from int to u32. It counts bytes against the
> unsigned scatterlist lengths and can never be negative, so the signed
> type only invites sign-confusion in the pop loop.
>
> Fixes: 7246d8ed4dcc ("bpf: helper to pop data from messages")
> Signed-off-by: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 80439767e0ee..9cdfec2ca11e 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -2974,8 +2974,8 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_msg_pop_data, struct sk_msg *, msg, u32, start,
> u32, len, u64, flags)
> {
> u32 i = 0, l = 0, space, offset = 0;
> - u64 last = start + len;
> - int pop;
> + u64 last = (u64)start + len;
sashiko is correct that there are 4 other issue in very similar code path
all in skmsg. Please fix them all in one go.
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 8:11 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf, sockmap: fix bpf_msg_pop_data() integer overflow Sechang Lim
2026-06-10 8:11 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix integer overflow in bpf_msg_pop_data() bounds check Sechang Lim
2026-06-10 17:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-06-10 8:11 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_msg_pop_data() overflow Sechang Lim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJ5JTZ788GDY.FXAAY47YDG3N@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cwang@multikernel.io \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox