[PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf, sockmap: fix bpf_msg_pop_data() integer overflow

[PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf, sockmap: fix bpf_msg_pop_data() integer overflow

[Sechang Lim]

bpf_msg_pop_data() computes "u64 last = start + len" with u32 operands,
so a len close to U32_MAX wraps the sum and passes the bounds check. The
pop loop then walks off the end of the sk_msg scatterlist and
sk_msg_shift_left() calls put_page() on the empty msg->sg.end slot.

v2:
 - add selftest (Cong Wang)
 - change pop to u32 (Emil Tsalapatis)

v1:
 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609183927.4021802-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com/

Sechang Lim (2):
  bpf, sockmap: fix integer overflow in bpf_msg_pop_data() bounds check
  selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_msg_pop_data() overflow

 net/core/filter.c                             |  4 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.c     | 27 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.c

-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix integer overflow in bpf_msg_pop_data() bounds check

[Sechang Lim]

start and len are u32, so

	u64 last = start + len;

evaluates start + len in 32-bit and wraps before storing it in last.
The bounds check

	if (start >= offset + l || last > msg->sg.size)
		return -EINVAL;

can then be passed with an out-of-range start/len, after which the pop
loop runs off the end of the scatterlist and sk_msg_shift_left() calls
put_page() on the empty msg->sg.end slot:

  Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
  0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]
  RIP: 0010:sk_msg_shift_left net/core/filter.c:2957 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:____bpf_msg_pop_data net/core/filter.c:3103 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:bpf_msg_pop_data+0x753/0x1a10 net/core/filter.c:2984
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   bpf_prog_4cc92c278f4d5d56+0x1b1/0x1e8
   bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu+0x107/0x320 include/linux/filter.h:746
   sk_psock_msg_verdict+0x357/0x7f0 net/core/skmsg.c:934
   tcp_bpf_send_verdict net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:420 [inline]
   tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x766/0x1ae0 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:583
   __sock_sendmsg+0x153/0x1c0 net/socket.c:802
   __sys_sendto+0x326/0x430 net/socket.c:2265
   __x64_sys_sendto+0xe3/0x100 net/socket.c:2268
   do_syscall_64+0x14c/0x480
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
   </TASK>

Widen the addition with a (u64) cast so the bound is evaluated in
64-bit and a len near U32_MAX no longer wraps below msg->sg.size.

While here, change pop from int to u32. It counts bytes against the
unsigned scatterlist lengths and can never be negative, so the signed
type only invites sign-confusion in the pop loop.

Fixes: 7246d8ed4dcc ("bpf: helper to pop data from messages")
Signed-off-by: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 80439767e0ee..9cdfec2ca11e 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -2974,8 +2974,8 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_msg_pop_data, struct sk_msg *, msg, u32, start,
 	   u32, len, u64, flags)
 {
 	u32 i = 0, l = 0, space, offset = 0;
-	u64 last = start + len;
-	int pop;
+	u64 last = (u64)start + len;
+	u32 pop;
 
 	if (unlikely(flags))
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_msg_pop_data() overflow

[Sechang Lim]

Add a test in sockmap_basic.c that calls bpf_msg_pop_data() with a length
close to U32_MAX, which overflows the start + len bounds check. The sk_msg
program records the return value over a sendmsg and the test checks that
the call is rejected with -EINVAL.

Signed-off-by: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.c     | 27 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index d2846579285f..cb3229711f93 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include "test_sockmap_pass_prog.skel.h"
 #include "test_sockmap_drop_prog.skel.h"
 #include "test_sockmap_change_tail.skel.h"
+#include "test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.skel.h"
 #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
 
 #include "sockmap_helpers.h"
@@ -666,6 +667,51 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_change_tail(void)
 	test_sockmap_change_tail__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+static void test_sockmap_msg_verdict_pop_data(void)
+{
+	struct test_sockmap_msg_pop_data *skel;
+	int err, map, verdict;
+	int c1 = -1, p1 = -1, sent;
+	int zero = 0;
+	char *buf;
+	const size_t len = 32 * 1024;
+
+	skel = test_sockmap_msg_pop_data__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	verdict = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_msg_pop_data);
+	map = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.sock_map);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict, map, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = create_pair(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, &c1, &p1);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create_pair"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &c1, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	buf = calloc(len, 1);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "calloc"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	sent = xsend(c1, buf, len, 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(sent, (ssize_t)len, "xsend");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->pop_data_ret, -EINVAL, "pop_data_rejects overflow");
+
+	free(buf);
+
+out_close:
+	close(c1);
+	close(p1);
+out:
+	test_sockmap_msg_pop_data__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek_helper(int map)
 {
 	int err, c1, p1, zero = 0, sent, recvd, avail;
@@ -1373,6 +1419,8 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(false);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict change tail"))
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_change_tail();
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap msg_verdict pop_data overflow"))
+		test_sockmap_msg_verdict_pop_data();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict msg_f_peek"))
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict msg_f_peek with link"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..301e65b95256
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_pop_data.c
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+} sock_map SEC(".maps");
+
+#define POP_START 0x48a3
+#define POP_LEN   0xfffffffd
+
+long pop_data_ret = 1;
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+int prog_msg_pop_data(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
+{
+	if (msg->size <= POP_START)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	pop_data_ret = bpf_msg_pop_data(msg, POP_START, POP_LEN, 0);
+	return SK_PASS;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix integer overflow in bpf_msg_pop_data() bounds check

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Wed Jun 10, 2026 at 1:11 AM PDT, Sechang Lim wrote:
> start and len are u32, so
>
> 	u64 last = start + len;
>
> evaluates start + len in 32-bit and wraps before storing it in last.
> The bounds check
>
> 	if (start >= offset + l || last > msg->sg.size)
> 		return -EINVAL;
>
> can then be passed with an out-of-range start/len, after which the pop
> loop runs off the end of the scatterlist and sk_msg_shift_left() calls
> put_page() on the empty msg->sg.end slot:
>
>   Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
>   0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
>   KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]
>   RIP: 0010:sk_msg_shift_left net/core/filter.c:2957 [inline]
>   RIP: 0010:____bpf_msg_pop_data net/core/filter.c:3103 [inline]
>   RIP: 0010:bpf_msg_pop_data+0x753/0x1a10 net/core/filter.c:2984
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    bpf_prog_4cc92c278f4d5d56+0x1b1/0x1e8
>    bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu+0x107/0x320 include/linux/filter.h:746
>    sk_psock_msg_verdict+0x357/0x7f0 net/core/skmsg.c:934
>    tcp_bpf_send_verdict net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:420 [inline]
>    tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x766/0x1ae0 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:583
>    __sock_sendmsg+0x153/0x1c0 net/socket.c:802
>    __sys_sendto+0x326/0x430 net/socket.c:2265
>    __x64_sys_sendto+0xe3/0x100 net/socket.c:2268
>    do_syscall_64+0x14c/0x480
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>    </TASK>
>
> Widen the addition with a (u64) cast so the bound is evaluated in
> 64-bit and a len near U32_MAX no longer wraps below msg->sg.size.
>
> While here, change pop from int to u32. It counts bytes against the
> unsigned scatterlist lengths and can never be negative, so the signed
> type only invites sign-confusion in the pop loop.
>
> Fixes: 7246d8ed4dcc ("bpf: helper to pop data from messages")
> Signed-off-by: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/core/filter.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 80439767e0ee..9cdfec2ca11e 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -2974,8 +2974,8 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_msg_pop_data, struct sk_msg *, msg, u32, start,
>  	   u32, len, u64, flags)
>  {
>  	u32 i = 0, l = 0, space, offset = 0;
> -	u64 last = start + len;
> -	int pop;
> +	u64 last = (u64)start + len;

sashiko is correct that there are 4 other issue in very similar code path
all in skmsg. Please fix them all in one go.

pw-bot: cr