Re: [PATCH net-next v9 1/7] net/sched: cls_api: Support hardware miss to tc action

[Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:09:51PM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/02/2023 21:24, Edward Cree wrote:
> > On 14/02/2023 18:48, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Oz Shlomo wrote:
> > > > Actually, I think the current naming scheme of act_cookie and miss_cookie
> > > > makes sense.
> > > 
> > > Then perhaps,
> > > act_cookie here -> instance_cookie
> > > miss_cookie -> config_cookie
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the bikeshedding, btw, but these cookies are getting
> > > confusing. We need them to taste nice :-}
> > 
> > I'm with Oz, keep the current name for act_cookie.
> > 
> > (In my ideal world, it'd just be called cookie, and the existing
> >   cookie in struct flow_action_entry would be renamed user_cookie.
> >   Because act_cookie is the same thing conceptually as
> >   flow_cls_offload.cookie.  Though I wonder if that means it
> >   belongs in struct flow_offload_action instead?)
> > 
> > -ed
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ok so I want to add this patch to the series:
> 
> 
> From 326938812758dbd2591b221452708504911ca419 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:57:40 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] net: sched: Rename user cookie and act cookie
> 
> struct tc_action->act_cookie is a user defined cookie,
> and the related struct flow_action_entry->act_cookie is
> used as an handle similar to struct flow_cls_offload->cookie.
> 
> Rename tc_action->act_cookie to user_cookie, and
> flow_action_entry->act_cookie to cookie so their names
> would better fit their usage.

Makes sense. This helps a lot already.
(I didn't review the patch carefully yet, but it seems good)
Thanks!