From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/14] devlink: split out core code
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 10:50:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7VL6P0hfCEvBFzV@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230104041636.226398-3-kuba@kernel.org>
Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:16:24AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>Move core code into a separate file. It's spread around the main
>file which makes refactoring and figuring out how devlink works
>harder.
>
>Move the xarray, all the most core devlink instance code out like
>locking, ref counting, alloc, register, etc. Leave port stuff in
>basic.c, if we want to move port code it'd probably be to its own file.
leftover.c
>
>Rename devlink_netdevice_event() to make it clear that it only touches
>ports (that's the only change which isn't a pure code move).
Did you do any other changes on the move? I believe that for patches
like this that move a lot of code it is beneficial to move the code "as
is". The changes could be done in a separate patches, for the ease of
review purposes. Could you please?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 4:16 [PATCH net-next 00/14] devlink: code split and structured instance walk Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] devlink: split out core code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 9:50 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-01-05 2:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 23:55 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] devlink: split out netlink code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05 9:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 8:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] netlink: add macro for checking dump ctx size Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 9:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] devlink: use an explicit structure for dump context Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 2:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] devlink: remove start variables from dumps Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] devlink: drop the filter argument from devlinks_xa_find_get Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] devlink: health: combine loops in dump Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (simple) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 14:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 3:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (nested) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (function) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] devlink: uniformly take the devlink instance lock in the dump loop Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] devlink: add by-instance dump infra Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 16:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 3:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05 9:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 8:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 19:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-10 14:31 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 0:13 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 11:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] devlink: convert remaining dumps to the by-instance scheme Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7VL6P0hfCEvBFzV@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox