public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (simple)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 15:18:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7WKzkKe69TDfKEM@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230104041636.226398-10-kuba@kernel.org>

Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:16:31AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>xarray gives each devlink instance an id and allows us to restart
>walk based on that id quite neatly. This is nice both from the
>perspective of code brevity and from the stability of the dump
>(devlink instances disappearing from before the resumption point
>will not cause inconsistent dumps).
>
>This patch takes care of simple cases where dump->idx counts
>devlink instances only.
>
>Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>---
> net/devlink/core.c          |  2 +-
> net/devlink/devl_internal.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> net/devlink/leftover.c      | 36 ++++++++----------------------------
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/devlink/core.c b/net/devlink/core.c
>index 3a99bf84632e..371d6821315d 100644
>--- a/net/devlink/core.c
>+++ b/net/devlink/core.c
>@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void devlink_put(struct devlink *devlink)
> 		call_rcu(&devlink->rcu, __devlink_put_rcu);
> }
> 
>-static struct devlink *
>+struct devlink *
> devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
> 		     void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
> 					  unsigned long, xa_mark_t))
>diff --git a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
>index ee98f3bdcd33..a567ff77601d 100644
>--- a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
>+++ b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
>@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ extern struct genl_family devlink_nl_family;
> 	     devlink; devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_next(net, &index))
> 
> struct devlink *
>+devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
>+		     void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
>+					  unsigned long, xa_mark_t));
>+struct devlink *
> devlinks_xa_find_get_first(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
> struct devlink *
> devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
>@@ -104,6 +108,7 @@ enum devlink_multicast_groups {
> 
> /* state held across netlink dumps */
> struct devlink_nl_dump_state {
>+	unsigned long instance;
> 	int idx;
> 	union {
> 		/* DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_READ */
>@@ -117,6 +122,15 @@ struct devlink_nl_dump_state {
> 	};
> };
> 
>+/* Iterate over devlink pointers which were possible to get reference to.
>+ * devlink_put() needs to be called for each iterated devlink pointer
>+ * in loop body in order to release the reference.
>+ */
>+#define devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get(msg, dump, devlink)		\
>+	for (; (devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get(sock_net(msg->sk),	\

I undestand that the "dump" is zeroed at the beginning of dumpit call,
however, if you call this helper multiple times, the second iteration
would't not work.

Perhaps better to initialize instance=0 at the beginning of the loop to
make this helper calls behaviour independent on context.


>+					       &dump->instance, xa_find)); \
>+	     dump->instance++)
>+
> extern const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[56];
> 
> struct devlink *devlink_get_from_attrs(struct net *net, struct nlattr **attrs);
>diff --git a/net/devlink/leftover.c b/net/devlink/leftover.c
>index e3cfb64990b4..0f24b321b0bb 100644
>--- a/net/devlink/leftover.c
>+++ b/net/devlink/leftover.c
>@@ -1319,17 +1319,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> {
> 	struct devlink_nl_dump_state *dump = devl_dump_state(cb);
> 	struct devlink *devlink;
>-	unsigned long index;
>-	int idx = 0;
> 	int err;
> 
>-	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(sock_net(msg->sk), index, devlink) {
>-		if (idx < dump->idx) {
>-			idx++;
>-			devlink_put(devlink);
>-			continue;
>-		}
>-
>+	devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get(msg, dump, devlink) {

The name suggests on the first sight that you are iterating some dump,
which is slightly confusing. Perhaps better to have
"devlinks_xa_for_each_" in the prefix somehow?

	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get_dumping()

I know it is long :)


> 		devl_lock(devlink);
> 		err = devlink_nl_fill(msg, devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW,
> 				      NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
>@@ -1339,10 +1331,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 
> 		if (err)
> 			goto out;
>-		idx++;
> 	}
> out:
>-	dump->idx = idx;
> 	return msg->len;
> }
> 
>@@ -4872,13 +4862,13 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> {
> 	struct devlink_nl_dump_state *dump = devl_dump_state(cb);
> 	struct devlink *devlink;
>-	unsigned long index;
>-	int idx = 0;
> 	int err = 0;
> 
>-	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(sock_net(msg->sk), index, devlink) {
>-		if (idx < dump->idx || !devlink->ops->selftest_check)
>-			goto inc;
>+	devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get(msg, dump, devlink) {
>+		if (!devlink->ops->selftest_check) {
>+			devlink_put(devlink);
>+			continue;
>+		}
> 
> 		devl_lock(devlink);
> 		err = devlink_nl_selftests_fill(msg, devlink,
>@@ -4890,15 +4880,13 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 			devlink_put(devlink);
> 			break;
> 		}
>-inc:
>-		idx++;
>+
> 		devlink_put(devlink);
> 	}
> 
> 	if (err != -EMSGSIZE)
> 		return err;
> 
>-	dump->idx = idx;
> 	return msg->len;
> }
> 
>@@ -6747,14 +6735,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_info_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> {
> 	struct devlink_nl_dump_state *dump = devl_dump_state(cb);
> 	struct devlink *devlink;
>-	unsigned long index;
>-	int idx = 0;
> 	int err = 0;
> 
>-	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(sock_net(msg->sk), index, devlink) {
>-		if (idx < dump->idx)
>-			goto inc;
>-
>+	devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get(msg, dump, devlink) {
> 		devl_lock(devlink);
> 		err = devlink_nl_info_fill(msg, devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_INFO_GET,
> 					   NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
>@@ -6767,15 +6750,12 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_info_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 			devlink_put(devlink);
> 			break;
> 		}
>-inc:
>-		idx++;
> 		devlink_put(devlink);
> 	}
> 
> 	if (err != -EMSGSIZE)
> 		return err;
> 
>-	dump->idx = idx;
> 	return msg->len;
> }
> 
>-- 
>2.38.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04  4:16 [PATCH net-next 00/14] devlink: code split and structured instance walk Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] devlink: split out core code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  9:50   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05  2:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 23:55       ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] devlink: split out netlink code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05  9:03   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:20     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  8:47       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] netlink: add macro for checking dump ctx size Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  9:51   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] devlink: use an explicit structure for dump context Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:04   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05  2:22     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] devlink: remove start variables from dumps Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] devlink: drop the filter argument from devlinks_xa_find_get Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:05   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] devlink: health: combine loops in dump Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:06   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (simple) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 14:18   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-01-05  3:21     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (nested) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:47   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (function) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:51   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] devlink: uniformly take the devlink instance lock in the dump loop Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:52   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] devlink: add by-instance dump infra Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 16:50   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05  3:46     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05  9:02       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:24         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  8:56           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:12             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07  9:23               ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 19:49                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-10 14:31                   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12  0:13                     ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 11:25       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] devlink: convert remaining dumps to the by-instance scheme Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7WKzkKe69TDfKEM@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox