From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check()
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:31:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfjh4FqmN3Xe1umR@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220201070701.GU1223722@gauss3.secunet.de>
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:07:01AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:08:40AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > The xfrm_dev_register() and xfrm_dev_feat_change() have same
> > implementation of one call to xfrm_api_check(). Instead of doing such
> > indirection, call to xfrm_api_check() directly and delete duplicated
> > functions.
> >
> > Fixes: 92a2320697f7 ("xfrm: check for xdo_dev_ops add and delete")
>
> There was nothing broken here, just a suboptimal implementation.
> So please remove the Fixes tag, otherwise it gets backported
> without a need.
No problem, I will remove.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 14 ++------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> > index 3fa066419d37..36d6c1835844 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> > @@ -380,16 +380,6 @@ static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > }
> >
> > -static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
> > -{
> > - return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int xfrm_dev_feat_change(struct net_device *dev)
> > -{
> > - return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> > -}
> > -
> > static int xfrm_dev_down(struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)
> > @@ -404,10 +394,10 @@ static int xfrm_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
> >
> > switch (event) {
> > case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> > - return xfrm_dev_register(dev);
> > + return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> >
> > case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
> > - return xfrm_dev_feat_change(dev);
> > + return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> >
> > case NETDEV_DOWN:
> > case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> > --
> > 2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-01 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 9:08 [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check() Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-01 7:07 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-02-01 7:31 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yfjh4FqmN3Xe1umR@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shannon.nelson@oracle.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox