public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check()
@ 2022-01-27  9:08 Leon Romanovsky
  2022-02-01  7:07 ` Steffen Klassert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2022-01-27  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steffen Klassert, Herbert Xu, David S . Miller
  Cc: Leon Romanovsky, netdev, Shannon Nelson

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

The xfrm_dev_register() and xfrm_dev_feat_change() have same
implementation of one call to xfrm_api_check(). Instead of doing such
indirection, call to xfrm_api_check() directly and delete duplicated
functions.

Fixes: 92a2320697f7 ("xfrm: check for xdo_dev_ops add and delete")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 3fa066419d37..36d6c1835844 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -380,16 +380,6 @@ static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
-static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
-{
-	return xfrm_api_check(dev);
-}
-
-static int xfrm_dev_feat_change(struct net_device *dev)
-{
-	return xfrm_api_check(dev);
-}
-
 static int xfrm_dev_down(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)
@@ -404,10 +394,10 @@ static int xfrm_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
 
 	switch (event) {
 	case NETDEV_REGISTER:
-		return xfrm_dev_register(dev);
+		return xfrm_api_check(dev);
 
 	case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
-		return xfrm_dev_feat_change(dev);
+		return xfrm_api_check(dev);
 
 	case NETDEV_DOWN:
 	case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check()
  2022-01-27  9:08 [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check() Leon Romanovsky
@ 2022-02-01  7:07 ` Steffen Klassert
  2022-02-01  7:31   ` Leon Romanovsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Klassert @ 2022-02-01  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Romanovsky
  Cc: Herbert Xu, David S . Miller, Leon Romanovsky, netdev,
	Shannon Nelson

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:08:40AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> 
> The xfrm_dev_register() and xfrm_dev_feat_change() have same
> implementation of one call to xfrm_api_check(). Instead of doing such
> indirection, call to xfrm_api_check() directly and delete duplicated
> functions.
> 
> Fixes: 92a2320697f7 ("xfrm: check for xdo_dev_ops add and delete")

There was nothing broken here, just a suboptimal implementation.
So please remove the Fixes tag, otherwise it gets backported
without a need.

Thanks!

> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 14 ++------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> index 3fa066419d37..36d6c1835844 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> @@ -380,16 +380,6 @@ static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
>  	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  }
>  
> -static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
> -{
> -	return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> -}
> -
> -static int xfrm_dev_feat_change(struct net_device *dev)
> -{
> -	return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> -}
> -
>  static int xfrm_dev_down(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>  	if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)
> @@ -404,10 +394,10 @@ static int xfrm_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
>  
>  	switch (event) {
>  	case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> -		return xfrm_dev_register(dev);
> +		return xfrm_api_check(dev);
>  
>  	case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
> -		return xfrm_dev_feat_change(dev);
> +		return xfrm_api_check(dev);
>  
>  	case NETDEV_DOWN:
>  	case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> -- 
> 2.34.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check()
  2022-02-01  7:07 ` Steffen Klassert
@ 2022-02-01  7:31   ` Leon Romanovsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2022-02-01  7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steffen Klassert; +Cc: Herbert Xu, David S . Miller, netdev, Shannon Nelson

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:07:01AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:08:40AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > The xfrm_dev_register() and xfrm_dev_feat_change() have same
> > implementation of one call to xfrm_api_check(). Instead of doing such
> > indirection, call to xfrm_api_check() directly and delete duplicated
> > functions.
> > 
> > Fixes: 92a2320697f7 ("xfrm: check for xdo_dev_ops add and delete")
> 
> There was nothing broken here, just a suboptimal implementation.
> So please remove the Fixes tag, otherwise it gets backported
> without a need.

No problem, I will remove.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 14 ++------------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> > index 3fa066419d37..36d6c1835844 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> > @@ -380,16 +380,6 @@ static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
> > -{
> > -	return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int xfrm_dev_feat_change(struct net_device *dev)
> > -{
> > -	return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int xfrm_dev_down(struct net_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)
> > @@ -404,10 +394,10 @@ static int xfrm_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
> >  
> >  	switch (event) {
> >  	case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> > -		return xfrm_dev_register(dev);
> > +		return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> >  
> >  	case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
> > -		return xfrm_dev_feat_change(dev);
> > +		return xfrm_api_check(dev);
> >  
> >  	case NETDEV_DOWN:
> >  	case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-01  7:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-27  9:08 [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: delete duplicated functions that calls same xfrm_api_check() Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-01  7:07 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-02-01  7:31   ` Leon Romanovsky

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox