From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 2/2] tg3: Link queues to NAPIs
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:38:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwPkVlFwFikuFI9N@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKFLiknyPntcYXrhsVkz5Mpt9kep0cnkYBGVb1f74x5+HS4Cg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 12:30:09AM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:57 AM Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com> wrote:
> >
> > Link queues to NAPIs using the netdev-genl API so this information is
> > queryable.
> >
> > $ ./tools/net/ynl/cli.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \
> > --dump queue-get --json='{"ifindex": 2}'
> >
> > [{'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8194, 'type': 'rx'},
> > {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8195, 'type': 'rx'},
> > {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8196, 'type': 'rx'},
> > {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8197, 'type': 'rx'},
> > {'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8193, 'type': 'tx'}]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
>
> > static void tg3_napi_enable(struct tg3 *tp)
> > {
> > + int txq_idx = 0, rxq_idx = 0;
> > + struct tg3_napi *tnapi;
> > int i;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < tp->irq_cnt; i++)
> > - napi_enable(&tp->napi[i].napi);
> > + for (i = 0; i < tp->irq_cnt; i++) {
> > + tnapi = &tp->napi[i];
> > + napi_enable(&tnapi->napi);
> > + if (tnapi->tx_buffers) {
> > + netif_queue_set_napi(tp->dev, txq_idx,
> > + NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX,
> > + &tnapi->napi);
> > + txq_idx++;
> > + } else if (tnapi->rx_rcb) {
>
> Shouldn't this be "if" instead of "else if" ? A napi can be for both
> a TX ring and an RX ring in some cases.
> Thanks.
OK, but is this approach (with the running counters) acceptable for
rxq and txq numbering? If not, can you suggest an alternative?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-05 14:57 [RFC net-next v2 0/2] tg3: Link IRQs, NAPIs, and queues Joe Damato
2024-10-05 14:57 ` [net-next v3 1/2] tg3: Link IRQs to NAPI instances Joe Damato
2024-10-05 14:57 ` [net-next v3 2/2] tg3: Link queues to NAPIs Joe Damato
2024-10-07 7:30 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-07 13:38 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-10-07 14:23 ` Joe Damato
2024-10-07 22:39 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-06 21:15 ` [RFC net-next v2 0/2] tg3: Link IRQs, NAPIs, and queues Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwPkVlFwFikuFI9N@LQ3V64L9R2 \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox