Re: [syzbot] [lvs?] possible deadlock in start_sync

Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* Re: [syzbot] [lvs?] possible deadlock in start_sync_thread
       [not found] <000000000000abf2f0061ba46a1a@google.com>
@ 2024-11-02  0:20 ` syzbot
  2024-11-05 11:25   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-11-02  0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: coreteam, davem, edumazet, horms, ja, kadlec, kuba, linux-kernel,
	lvs-devel, netdev, netfilter-devel, pabeni, pablo, syzkaller-bugs

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    6c52d4da1c74 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree:       upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12889630580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=672325e7ab17fdf7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e929093395ec65f969c7
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1788e187980000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=14a4f2a7980000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/70526f6a5c28/disk-6c52d4da.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8ca3cd20d331/vmlinux-6c52d4da.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9c4393fc9a08/bzImage-6c52d4da.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e929093395ec65f969c7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-rc5-syzkaller-00181-g6c52d4da1c74 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor158/5839 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8fcd3448 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_sync_thread+0xdc/0x2dc0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1761

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888034ac8aa8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xdb0 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
       smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2771
       sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:729 [inline]
       __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:744
       __sys_sendto+0x39b/0x4f0 net/socket.c:2214
       __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2226 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2222 [inline]
       __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2222
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3611
       do_ip_setsockopt+0x1a2d/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1078
       ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2334
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1a2/0x250 net/socket.c:2357
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2366 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2363 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2363
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
       __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       start_sync_thread+0xdc/0x2dc0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1761
       do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x442/0x13d0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2732
       nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101
       smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2334
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1a2/0x250 net/socket.c:2357
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2366 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2363 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2363
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
                               lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
  lock(rtnl_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor158/5839:
 #0: ffff888034ac8aa8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5839 Comm: syz-executor158 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-syzkaller-00181-g6c52d4da1c74 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 start_sync_thread+0xdc/0x2dc0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1761
 do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x442/0x13d0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2732
 nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101
 smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2334
 __sys_setsockopt+0x1a2/0x250 net/socket.c:2357
 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2366 [inline]
 __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2363 [inline]
 __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2363
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f468bc1c369
Code: 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 37 17 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe79331b18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe79331ce8 RCX: 00007f468bc1c369
RDX: 000000000000048b RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f468bc8f610 R08: 0000000000000018 R09: 00007ffe79331ce8
R10: 0000000020000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 00007ffe79331cd8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001
 </TASK>
IPVS: Unkn


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [lvs?] possible deadlock in start_sync_thread
  2024-11-02  0:20 ` [syzbot] [lvs?] possible deadlock in start_sync_thread syzbot
@ 2024-11-05 11:25   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  2024-11-06 10:01     ` D. Wythe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2024-11-05 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wenjia Zhang, Jan Karcher, D. Wythe, Tony Lu, Wen Gu, linux-s390
  Cc: syzbot, coreteam, davem, edumazet, horms, ja, kadlec, kuba,
	linux-kernel, lvs-devel, netdev, netfilter-devel, pabeni,
	syzkaller-bugs

Hi,

I am Cc'ing SHARED MEMORY COMMUNICATIONS (SMC) SOCKETS maintainers.

Similar issue already reported by syzkaller here:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZyIgRmJUbnZpzXNV@calendula/T/#mf1f03a65108226102d8567c9fb6bab98c072444c

related to smc->clcsock_release_lock.

I think this is a false possible lockdep considers smc->clcsock_release_lock
is a lock of the same class sk_lock-AF_INET.

Could you please advise?

Thanks.

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 05:20:27PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    6c52d4da1c74 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
> git tree:       upstream
> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12889630580000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=672325e7ab17fdf7
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e929093395ec65f969c7
> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1788e187980000
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=14a4f2a7980000
> 
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/70526f6a5c28/disk-6c52d4da.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8ca3cd20d331/vmlinux-6c52d4da.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9c4393fc9a08/bzImage-6c52d4da.xz
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+e929093395ec65f969c7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.12.0-rc5-syzkaller-00181-g6c52d4da1c74 #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor158/5839 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffff8fcd3448 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_sync_thread+0xdc/0x2dc0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1761
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff888034ac8aa8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> 
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> 
> -> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
>        lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>        __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
>        __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
>        smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xdb0 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
>        smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2771
>        sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:729 [inline]
>        __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:744
>        __sys_sendto+0x39b/0x4f0 net/socket.c:2214
>        __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2226 [inline]
>        __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2222 [inline]
>        __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2222
>        do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>        do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
>        lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>        lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3611
>        do_ip_setsockopt+0x1a2d/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1078
>        ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
>        do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2334
>        __sys_setsockopt+0x1a2/0x250 net/socket.c:2357
>        __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2366 [inline]
>        __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2363 [inline]
>        __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2363
>        do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>        do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> -> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
>        check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>        check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>        validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>        __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>        lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>        __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
>        __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
>        start_sync_thread+0xdc/0x2dc0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1761
>        do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x442/0x13d0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2732
>        nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101
>        smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
>        do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2334
>        __sys_setsockopt+0x1a2/0x250 net/socket.c:2357
>        __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2366 [inline]
>        __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2363 [inline]
>        __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2363
>        do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>        do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 
> Chain exists of:
>   rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock
> 
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
>                                lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
>                                lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
>   lock(rtnl_mutex);
> 
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> 1 lock held by syz-executor158/5839:
>  #0: ffff888034ac8aa8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056
> 
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5839 Comm: syz-executor158 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-syzkaller-00181-g6c52d4da1c74 #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
>  dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
>  check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
>  check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>  check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>  validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>  __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>  lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>  __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
>  __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
>  start_sync_thread+0xdc/0x2dc0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1761
>  do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x442/0x13d0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2732
>  nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101
>  smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
>  do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2334
>  __sys_setsockopt+0x1a2/0x250 net/socket.c:2357
>  __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2366 [inline]
>  __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2363 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2363
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f468bc1c369
> Code: 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 37 17 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffe79331b18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe79331ce8 RCX: 00007f468bc1c369
> RDX: 000000000000048b RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
> RBP: 00007f468bc8f610 R08: 0000000000000018 R09: 00007ffe79331ce8
> R10: 0000000020000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: 00007ffe79331cd8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001
>  </TASK>
> IPVS: Unkn
> 
> 
> ---
> If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
> #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
> If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [lvs?] possible deadlock in start_sync_thread
  2024-11-05 11:25   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2024-11-06 10:01     ` D. Wythe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: D. Wythe @ 2024-11-06 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Wenjia Zhang, Jan Karcher, Tony Lu, Wen Gu,
	linux-s390
  Cc: syzbot, coreteam, davem, edumazet, horms, ja, kadlec, kuba,
	linux-kernel, lvs-devel, netdev, netfilter-devel, pabeni,
	syzkaller-bugs



On 11/5/24 7:25 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am Cc'ing SHARED MEMORY COMMUNICATIONS (SMC) SOCKETS maintainers.
> 
> Similar issue already reported by syzkaller here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZyIgRmJUbnZpzXNV@calendula/T/#mf1f03a65108226102d8567c9fb6bab98c072444c
> 
> related to smc->clcsock_release_lock.
> 
> I think this is a false possible lockdep considers smc->clcsock_release_lock
> is a lock of the same class sk_lock-AF_INET.
> 
> Could you please advise?
> 
> Thanks.

Hi Pablo,

Thank you for the reminder. We are currently working on it. The community has already submitted some 
fixes[1], and we are still reviewing them.


Best wishes,
D. Wythe


[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c2ac8e30806af319eb96f67103196b7cda22d562.1729031472.git.danielyangkang@gmail.com/




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-06 10:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <000000000000abf2f0061ba46a1a@google.com>
2024-11-02  0:20 ` [syzbot] [lvs?] possible deadlock in start_sync_thread syzbot
2024-11-05 11:25   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-11-06 10:01     ` D. Wythe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox