From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>,
Haon KIM <akrn112@naver.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: vrf: Set L3MDEV OIF flag for outbound lookups
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 08:35:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3e50c6f-0da2-4e77-80b5-2ae371676280@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auH8PdGEPaf2GI73@luna.proxmox.com>
[ cc author of referenced Fixes commit ]
On 10/28/26 7:57 AM, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> On 27.10.2026 01:47, Haon KIM wrote:
>> The IPv4 and IPv6 outbound processing paths in the VRF driver
>> set the L3 master device index in the flow structure before
>> performing route lookups, but do not set
>> FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF.
>>
>> Both the IPv4 and IPv6 outbound processing paths contain
>> the comment "needed to match OIF rule", indicating that
>> the L3 master device index is needed to match OIF rules.
>> However, FIB rule matching requires both
>> FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF and a matching flowi_l3mdev index
>> to match a rule specifying the VRF master as the output
>> interface.
>>
>> The matching logic introduced by commit 2d300ce0b783
>> ("net: fib_rules: Fix iif / oif matching on L3 master device")
>> requires FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF to be set for OIF rules to
>> match the VRF master. The existing outbound processing paths
>> set the L3 master device index directly, so
>> l3mdev_update_flow() does not set this flag.
>>
>> Consequently, OIF rules specifying the VRF master may fail
>> to match these flows.
>>
>> Set FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF in both outbound processing paths
>> so that FIB rules can correctly match the VRF master as the
>> output interface.
>>
>> The issue was identified by code inspection. Runtime testing
>> has not been performed.
Please do not do that; do some testing before sending patches.
>>
>> Fixes: 2d300ce0b783 ("net: fib_rules: Fix iif / oif matching on L3 master device")
>
> I think this should be:
>
> Fixes: 40867d74c374 ("net: Add l3mdev index to flow struct and avoid oif reset for port devices")
No, the Fixes above is correct if there is a bug; the
FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF flag was introduced by 2d300ce0b783 and was not
present for 40867d74c374.
That said, unless I am misremembering something the flag does not need
to be set in this outbound path.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Haon KIM <akrn112@naver.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/vrf.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
>> index 79d433f49f80..f22ac91fefd4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
>> @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v6_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> fl6.flowlabel = ip6_flowinfo(iph);
>> fl6.flowi6_mark = skb->mark;
>> fl6.flowi6_proto = iph->nexthdr;
>> + fl6.flowi6_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF;
>>
>> dst = ip6_dst_lookup_flow(net, NULL, &fl6, NULL);
>> if (IS_ERR(dst) || dst == dst_null)
>> @@ -506,7 +507,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> fl4.flowi4_l3mdev = vrf_dev->ifindex;
>> fl4.flowi4_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX;
>> fl4.flowi4_dscp = ip4h_dscp(ip4h);
>> - fl4.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC;
>> + fl4.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC | FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF;
>> fl4.flowi4_proto = ip4h->protocol;
>> fl4.daddr = ip4h->daddr;
>> fl4.saddr = ip4h->saddr;
>
> Also this is a breaking change, before the patch, this rule matched:
>
> ip rule add iif vrf0 table 100
>
> After the patch, this one matches (and the iif rule above no longer does):
>
> ip rule add oif vrf0 table 100
>
> A selftest would also be nice.
See commit message in cited Fixes commit. Have you checked
fib_rule_tests.sh? If not, try the commands in 2d300ce0b783 and if they
are broken, there is a problem. If not, let's get them added to the
selftest.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 16:47 [PATCH net] net: vrf: Set L3MDEV OIF flag for outbound lookups Haon KIM
2026-10-28 13:57 ` Gabriel Goller
2026-10-28 14:35 ` David Ahern [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3e50c6f-0da2-4e77-80b5-2ae371676280@kernel.org \
--to=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=akrn112@naver.com \
--cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox