From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: Haon KIM <akrn112@naver.com>
Cc: dsahern@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: vrf: Set L3MDEV OIF flag for outbound lookups
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 14:57:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auH8PdGEPaf2GI73@luna.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026164702.1415-1-akrn112@naver.com>
On 27.10.2026 01:47, Haon KIM wrote:
> The IPv4 and IPv6 outbound processing paths in the VRF driver
> set the L3 master device index in the flow structure before
> performing route lookups, but do not set
> FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF.
>
> Both the IPv4 and IPv6 outbound processing paths contain
> the comment "needed to match OIF rule", indicating that
> the L3 master device index is needed to match OIF rules.
> However, FIB rule matching requires both
> FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF and a matching flowi_l3mdev index
> to match a rule specifying the VRF master as the output
> interface.
>
> The matching logic introduced by commit 2d300ce0b783
> ("net: fib_rules: Fix iif / oif matching on L3 master device")
> requires FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF to be set for OIF rules to
> match the VRF master. The existing outbound processing paths
> set the L3 master device index directly, so
> l3mdev_update_flow() does not set this flag.
>
> Consequently, OIF rules specifying the VRF master may fail
> to match these flows.
>
> Set FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF in both outbound processing paths
> so that FIB rules can correctly match the VRF master as the
> output interface.
>
> The issue was identified by code inspection. Runtime testing
> has not been performed.
>
> Fixes: 2d300ce0b783 ("net: fib_rules: Fix iif / oif matching on L3 master device")
I think this should be:
Fixes: 40867d74c374 ("net: Add l3mdev index to flow struct and avoid oif reset for port devices")
> Signed-off-by: Haon KIM <akrn112@naver.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/vrf.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> index 79d433f49f80..f22ac91fefd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v6_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
> fl6.flowlabel = ip6_flowinfo(iph);
> fl6.flowi6_mark = skb->mark;
> fl6.flowi6_proto = iph->nexthdr;
> + fl6.flowi6_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF;
>
> dst = ip6_dst_lookup_flow(net, NULL, &fl6, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(dst) || dst == dst_null)
> @@ -506,7 +507,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
> fl4.flowi4_l3mdev = vrf_dev->ifindex;
> fl4.flowi4_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX;
> fl4.flowi4_dscp = ip4h_dscp(ip4h);
> - fl4.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC;
> + fl4.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC | FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF;
> fl4.flowi4_proto = ip4h->protocol;
> fl4.daddr = ip4h->daddr;
> fl4.saddr = ip4h->saddr;
Also this is a breaking change, before the patch, this rule matched:
ip rule add iif vrf0 table 100
After the patch, this one matches (and the iif rule above no longer does):
ip rule add oif vrf0 table 100
A selftest would also be nice.
Thanks,
Gabriel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 16:47 [PATCH net] net: vrf: Set L3MDEV OIF flag for outbound lookups Haon KIM
2026-10-28 13:57 ` Gabriel Goller [this message]
2026-10-28 14:35 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auH8PdGEPaf2GI73@luna.proxmox.com \
--to=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=akrn112@naver.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox