* [PATCH net-next] dpll: change dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size() to assume DPLL_A_PIN_ID will be used
@ 2026-05-21 17:14 Eric Dumazet
2026-05-21 22:26 ` Vadim Fedorenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2026-05-21 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, netdev, eric.dumazet, Eric Dumazet, Vadim Fedorenko,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski, Jiri Pirko
We plan to no longer hold RTNL in "ip link show", and use RCU instead.
Assume rtnl_fill_dpll_pin() will have to fill DPLL_A_PIN_ID.
It is fine to over-estimate skb size (by 8 bytes) in if_nlmsg_size().
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
---
drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 11 -----------
include/linux/dpll.h | 9 +++++++--
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 53ca24d0f191bc3268340543769fd96c836f9318..095ef8703c0b2687178a46c5312319376d518f79 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -89,17 +89,6 @@ static struct dpll_pin *dpll_netdev_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
return rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->dpll_pin);
}
-/**
- * dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size - get size of pin handle attribute of a netdev
- * @dev: netdev from which to get the pin
- *
- * Return: byte size of pin handle attribute, or 0 if @dev has no pin.
- */
-size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return dpll_netdev_pin(dev) ? nla_total_size(4) : 0; /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
-}
-
int dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg,
const struct net_device *dev)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
index 82dfadd9f593b780c11d1d05cd00b62a32d4f534..4071fd974dd714eca92cae70e40bcde5a87a4706 100644
--- a/include/linux/dpll.h
+++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
+#include <net/netlink.h>
struct dpll_device;
struct dpll_pin;
@@ -238,7 +239,11 @@ struct dpll_pin_notifier_info {
void dpll_netdev_pin_set(struct net_device *dev, struct dpll_pin *dpll_pin);
void dpll_netdev_pin_clear(struct net_device *dev);
-size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev);
+static inline size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(void)
+{
+ return nla_total_size(4); /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
+}
+
int dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg,
const struct net_device *dev);
@@ -249,7 +254,7 @@ static inline void
dpll_netdev_pin_set(struct net_device *dev, struct dpll_pin *dpll_pin) { }
static inline void dpll_netdev_pin_clear(struct net_device *dev) { }
-static inline size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev)
+static inline size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(void)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 6a5e9ace55a0880d7b1e4303d12dc0a8b8b7c5ed..d64600aa8adfe9ce7a0c45677ae36db73ee3d886 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -1264,11 +1264,11 @@ static size_t rtnl_devlink_port_size(const struct net_device *dev)
return size;
}
-static size_t rtnl_dpll_pin_size(const struct net_device *dev)
+static size_t rtnl_dpll_pin_size(void)
{
size_t size = nla_total_size(0); /* nest IFLA_DPLL_PIN */
- size += dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(dev);
+ size += dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size();
return size;
}
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ static noinline size_t if_nlmsg_size(const struct net_device *dev,
+ nla_total_size(4) /* IFLA_MAX_MTU */
+ nla_total_size(MAX_ADDR_LEN) /* IFLA_PERM_ADDRESS */
+ rtnl_devlink_port_size(dev)
- + rtnl_dpll_pin_size(dev)
+ + rtnl_dpll_pin_size()
+ nla_total_size(8) /* IFLA_MAX_PACING_OFFLOAD_HORIZON */
+ nla_total_size(2) /* IFLA_HEADROOM */
+ nla_total_size(2) /* IFLA_TAILROOM */
--
2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] dpll: change dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size() to assume DPLL_A_PIN_ID will be used
2026-05-21 17:14 [PATCH net-next] dpll: change dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size() to assume DPLL_A_PIN_ID will be used Eric Dumazet
@ 2026-05-21 22:26 ` Vadim Fedorenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vadim Fedorenko @ 2026-05-21 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, netdev, eric.dumazet, Arkadiusz Kubalewski,
Jiri Pirko
On 21.05.2026 18:14, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> We plan to no longer hold RTNL in "ip link show", and use RCU instead.
>
> Assume rtnl_fill_dpll_pin() will have to fill DPLL_A_PIN_ID.
>
> It is fine to over-estimate skb size (by 8 bytes) in if_nlmsg_size().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
> ---
> drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 11 -----------
> include/linux/dpll.h | 9 +++++++--
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-21 22:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-21 17:14 [PATCH net-next] dpll: change dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size() to assume DPLL_A_PIN_ID will be used Eric Dumazet
2026-05-21 22:26 ` Vadim Fedorenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox