From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: shenwei.wang@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, eric@nelint.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: fec: simplify the conditional preprocessor directives
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:24:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRO3nMEu/D/kw/ja@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251111100057.2660101-3-wei.fang@nxp.com>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 06:00:54PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> From the Kconfig file, we can see CONFIG_FEC depends on the following
> platform-related options.
>
> ColdFire: M523x, M527x, M5272, M528x, M520x and M532x
> S32: ARCH_S32 (ARM64)
> i.MX: SOC_IMX28 and ARCH_MXC (ARM and ARM64)
>
> Based on the code of fec driver, only some macro definitions on the
> M5272 platform are different from those on other platforms. Therefore,
> we can simplify the following complex preprocessor directives to
> "if !defined(CONFIG_M5272)".
>
> "#if defined(CONFIG_M523x) || defined(CONFIG_M527x) || \
> defined(CONFIG_M528x) || defined(CONFIG_M520x) || \
> defined(CONFIG_M532x) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) || \
> defined(CONFIG_ARM64)"
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h | 4 +---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 27 ++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> index 41e0d85d15da..8e438f6e7ec4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> @@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/timecounter.h>
> #include <net/xdp.h>
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_M523x) || defined(CONFIG_M527x) || defined(CONFIG_M528x) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_M520x) || defined(CONFIG_M532x) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_M5272) || defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> /*
> * Just figures, Motorola would have to change the offsets for
> * registers in the same peripheral device on different models
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index e0e84f2979c8..9d0e5abe5f66 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -253,9 +253,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(macaddr, "FEC Ethernet MAC address");
> * size bits. Other FEC hardware does not, so we need to take that into
> * account when setting it.
> */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_M523x) || defined(CONFIG_M527x) || defined(CONFIG_M528x) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_M520x) || defined(CONFIG_M532x) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +#ifndef CONFIG_M5272
> #define OPT_ARCH_HAS_MAX_FL 1
> #else
> #define OPT_ARCH_HAS_MAX_FL 0
> @@ -2704,9 +2702,7 @@ static int fec_enet_get_regs_len(struct net_device *ndev)
> }
>
> /* List of registers that can be safety be read to dump them with ethtool */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_M523x) || defined(CONFIG_M527x) || defined(CONFIG_M528x) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_M520x) || defined(CONFIG_M532x) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_M5272) || defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> static __u32 fec_enet_register_version = 2;
> static u32 fec_enet_register_offset[] = {
> FEC_IEVENT, FEC_IMASK, FEC_R_DES_ACTIVE_0, FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE_0,
> @@ -2780,29 +2776,20 @@ static u32 fec_enet_register_offset[] = {
> static void fec_enet_get_regs(struct net_device *ndev,
> struct ethtool_regs *regs, void *regbuf)
> {
> + u32 reg_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(fec_enet_register_offset);
> struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
> u32 __iomem *theregs = (u32 __iomem *)fep->hwp;
> + u32 *reg_list = fec_enet_register_offset;
> struct device *dev = &fep->pdev->dev;
> u32 *buf = (u32 *)regbuf;
> u32 i, off;
> int ret;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_M523x) || defined(CONFIG_M527x) || defined(CONFIG_M528x) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_M520x) || defined(CONFIG_M532x) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) || \
> - defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> - u32 *reg_list;
> - u32 reg_cnt;
> -
> - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> - reg_list = fec_enet_register_offset;
> - reg_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(fec_enet_register_offset);
> - } else {
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_M5272) || defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
There are stub of_machine_is_compatible(), so needn't #ifdef here.
Frank
> reg_list = fec_enet_register_offset_6ul;
> reg_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(fec_enet_register_offset_6ul);
> }
> -#else
> - /* coldfire */
> - static u32 *reg_list = fec_enet_register_offset;
> - static const u32 reg_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(fec_enet_register_offset);
> #endif
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 10:00 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: fec: do some cleanup for the driver Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: fec: remove useless conditional preprocessor directives Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:15 ` Frank Li
2025-11-12 20:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-13 1:35 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: fec: simplify the " Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:24 ` Frank Li [this message]
2025-11-12 1:53 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-13 16:27 ` Frank Li
2025-11-14 2:20 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-18 3:04 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: fec: remove struct fec_enet_priv_txrx_info Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:30 ` Frank Li
2025-11-12 1:56 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: fec: remove rx_align from fec_enet_private Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:34 ` Frank Li
2025-11-12 2:00 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-12 20:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-13 1:40 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-13 13:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-14 2:17 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: fec: remove duplicate macros of the BD status Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:39 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRO3nMEu/D/kw/ja@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
--to=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric@nelint.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox