From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: shenwei.wang@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, eric@nelint.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: fec: remove duplicate macros of the BD status
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:39:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRO7I8XEUnQahVAu@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251111100057.2660101-6-wei.fang@nxp.com>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 06:00:57PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> There are two sets of macros used to define the status bits of TX and RX
> BDs, one is the BD_SC_xx macros, the other one is the BD_ENET_xx macros.
> For the BD_SC_xx macros, only BD_SC_WRAP is used in the driver. But the
> BD_ENET_xx macros are more widely used in the driver, and they define
> more bits of the BD status. Therefore, let us remove the BD_SC_xx macros
> from now on.
nit: remove "let us",
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h | 17 -----------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> index a25dca9c7d71..7b4d1fc8e7eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> @@ -240,23 +240,6 @@ struct bufdesc_ex {
> __fec16 res0[4];
> };
>
> -/*
> - * The following definitions courtesy of commproc.h, which where
> - * Copyright (c) 1997 Dan Malek (dmalek@jlc.net).
> - */
> -#define BD_SC_EMPTY ((ushort)0x8000) /* Receive is empty */
> -#define BD_SC_READY ((ushort)0x8000) /* Transmit is ready */
> -#define BD_SC_WRAP ((ushort)0x2000) /* Last buffer descriptor */
> -#define BD_SC_INTRPT ((ushort)0x1000) /* Interrupt on change */
> -#define BD_SC_CM ((ushort)0x0200) /* Continuous mode */
> -#define BD_SC_ID ((ushort)0x0100) /* Rec'd too many idles */
> -#define BD_SC_P ((ushort)0x0100) /* xmt preamble */
> -#define BD_SC_BR ((ushort)0x0020) /* Break received */
> -#define BD_SC_FR ((ushort)0x0010) /* Framing error */
> -#define BD_SC_PR ((ushort)0x0008) /* Parity error */
> -#define BD_SC_OV ((ushort)0x0002) /* Overrun */
> -#define BD_SC_CD ((ushort)0x0001) /* ?? */
> -
> /* Buffer descriptor control/status used by Ethernet receive.
> */
> #define BD_ENET_RX_EMPTY ((ushort)0x8000)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index cf598d5260fb..3d227c9c5ba5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static void fec_enet_bd_init(struct net_device *dev)
>
> /* Set the last buffer to wrap */
> bdp = fec_enet_get_prevdesc(bdp, &rxq->bd);
> - bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_SC_WRAP);
> + bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_ENET_RX_WRAP);
>
> rxq->bd.cur = rxq->bd.base;
> }
> @@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static void fec_enet_bd_init(struct net_device *dev)
>
> /* Set the last buffer to wrap */
> bdp = fec_enet_get_prevdesc(bdp, &txq->bd);
> - bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_SC_WRAP);
> + bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_ENET_TX_WRAP);
> txq->dirty_tx = bdp;
> }
> }
> @@ -3456,7 +3456,7 @@ fec_enet_alloc_rxq_buffers(struct net_device *ndev, unsigned int queue)
>
> /* Set the last buffer to wrap. */
> bdp = fec_enet_get_prevdesc(bdp, &rxq->bd);
> - bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_SC_WRAP);
> + bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_ENET_RX_WRAP);
> return 0;
>
> err_alloc:
> @@ -3492,7 +3492,7 @@ fec_enet_alloc_txq_buffers(struct net_device *ndev, unsigned int queue)
>
> /* Set the last buffer to wrap. */
> bdp = fec_enet_get_prevdesc(bdp, &txq->bd);
> - bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_SC_WRAP);
> + bdp->cbd_sc |= cpu_to_fec16(BD_ENET_TX_WRAP);
>
> return 0;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 10:00 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: fec: do some cleanup for the driver Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: fec: remove useless conditional preprocessor directives Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:15 ` Frank Li
2025-11-12 20:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-13 1:35 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: fec: simplify the " Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:24 ` Frank Li
2025-11-12 1:53 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-13 16:27 ` Frank Li
2025-11-14 2:20 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-18 3:04 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: fec: remove struct fec_enet_priv_txrx_info Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:30 ` Frank Li
2025-11-12 1:56 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: fec: remove rx_align from fec_enet_private Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:34 ` Frank Li
2025-11-12 2:00 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-12 20:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-13 1:40 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-13 13:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-14 2:17 ` Wei Fang
2025-11-11 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: fec: remove duplicate macros of the BD status Wei Fang
2025-11-11 22:39 ` Frank Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRO7I8XEUnQahVAu@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
--to=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric@nelint.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox