public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, fw@strlen.de, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	lkp@intel.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	pablo@netfilter.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send_unreach kfunc
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:07:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeYlCswvGdTHiAFp@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c706a726c2e82dfc6162f96d7c04313301c24d1a4e36af5c421fda7a1c01b1a1@mail.kernel.org>

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 11:36:15AM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> > --- a/net/core/filter.c
> > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> > +	case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
> > +		if (code < 0 || code > ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +		nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +		if (!nskb)
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +		if (!skb_dst(nskb) && ip6_route_reply_fetch_dst(nskb) < 0) {
> > +			kfree_skb(nskb);
> > +			return -EHOSTUNREACH;
> > +		}
> 
> Is the route lookup needed here? Looking at icmpv6_send() in
> net/ipv6/icmp.c, it fills fl6.{daddr,saddr} and passes them to
> icmpv6_route_lookup() which performs its own route lookup. The function
> doesn't appear to use skb_dst() from the original skb:
> 
> icmpv6_send() {
>     ...
>     fl6.daddr = hdr->saddr;
>     fl6.saddr = saddr;
>     ...
>     dst = icmpv6_route_lookup(net, skb, sk, &fl6);
>     ...
> }
> 
> The same applies to the IPv4 path with icmp_send(). Additionally, at
> cgroup/egress the skb->_skb_refdst should already be set, and the same
> should be true for cgroup/ingress for inet proto.
> 
> Does the kfunc work without ip_route_reply_fetch_dst() and
> ip6_route_reply_fetch_dst()? If so, can these calls be removed?
> 
> Reference: Martin KaFai Lau's comment in v3 review
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/df4b0996-3e88-4ea4-983b-82866455a6fc@linux.dev/

Same reply as https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aeYkdKm7B4NQ3BDo@gmail.com/,
too bad the LLM can't access the cover letter.

> 
> > +
> > +		*in_progress = true;
> > +		icmpv6_send(nskb, ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH, code, 0);
> > +		*in_progress = false;
> > +		kfree_skb(nskb);
> > +		break;
> > +#endif
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> 
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
> 
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/24663313503


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAADnVQKq_-=N7eJoup6AqFngoocT+D02NF0md_3mi2Vcrw09nQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-07-25 18:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/4] bpf: add icmp_send_unreach kfunc Mahe Tardy
2025-07-25 18:53   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] net: move netfilter nf_reject_fill_skb_dst to core ipv4 Mahe Tardy
2025-07-25 18:53   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] net: move netfilter nf_reject6_fill_skb_dst to core ipv6 Mahe Tardy
2025-07-25 18:53   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send_unreach cgroup_skb kfunc Mahe Tardy
2025-07-27  1:49     ` kernel test robot
2025-07-28  9:43       ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: add icmp_send_unreach kfunc Mahe Tardy
2025-07-28  9:43         ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] net: move netfilter nf_reject_fill_skb_dst to core ipv4 Mahe Tardy
2025-07-28  9:43         ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] net: move netfilter nf_reject6_fill_skb_dst to core ipv6 Mahe Tardy
2025-07-28  9:43         ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send_unreach cgroup_skb kfunc Mahe Tardy
2025-07-28 20:10           ` kernel test robot
2025-07-29  1:05           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29 10:06             ` Mahe Tardy
2025-07-29 23:13               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-28  9:43         ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: add icmp_send_unreach kfunc tests Mahe Tardy
2025-07-28 15:40           ` Yonghong Song
2025-07-28 15:59             ` Mahe Tardy
2025-07-29  1:18           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29  9:09             ` Mahe Tardy
2025-07-29 23:27               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-30  0:01                 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-30  0:32                   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-08-05 23:26           ` Jordan Rife
2025-07-29  1:21         ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: add icmp_send_unreach kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29  9:53           ` Mahe Tardy
2025-07-30  1:54             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-08-01 18:50               ` Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 10:58                 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] " Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 10:58                   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] net: move netfilter nf_reject_fill_skb_dst to core ipv4 Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 11:36                     ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-20 13:04                       ` Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 10:58                   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/6] net: move netfilter nf_reject6_fill_skb_dst to core ipv6 Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 10:58                   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send_unreach kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 11:36                     ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-20 13:07                       ` Mahe Tardy [this message]
2026-04-20 10:58                   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/6] selftests/bpf: add icmp_send_unreach kfunc tests Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 11:36                     ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-20 13:08                       ` Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 10:58                   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] selftests/bpf: add icmp_send_unreach kfunc IPv6 tests Mahe Tardy
2026-04-20 10:58                   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: add icmp_send_unreach_recursion test Mahe Tardy
2025-07-25 18:53   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: add icmp_send_unreach kfunc tests Mahe Tardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeYlCswvGdTHiAFp@gmail.com \
    --to=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox