From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: michael.chan@broadcom.com, pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com,
stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: bnxt_en: suspicious RCU usage in bnxt_fw_reset_task() qdisc path in 7.1-rc6
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 08:33:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah726OtFX-Qw3U-R@gmail.com> (raw)
I am hitting a "suspicious RCU usage" lockdep splat from bnxt_en
during a firmware reset on v7.1-rc6 (e43ffb69e043) with PROVE_RCU
and PROVE_LOCKING enabled.
The firmware reset path re-opens the device from bnxt_fw_reset_task()
holding only the netdev instance lock (&dev->lock). bnxt_open() ->
__bnxt_open_nic() -> bnxt_set_real_num_queues() ->
netif_set_real_num_tx_queues() then walks the qdisc tree in
dev_qdisc_change_real_num_tx(), which still dereferences dev->qdisc
with rtnl_dereference() and therefore expects rtnl_lock to be held:
void dev_qdisc_change_real_num_tx(struct net_device *dev,
unsigned int new_real_tx)
{
struct Qdisc *qdisc = rtnl_dereference(dev->qdisc);
...
}
Since only the instance lock is held in this path, lockdep complains.
Splat
-----
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
7.1.0 #1 Tainted: G E
-----------------------------
net/sched/sch_generic.c:1416 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
3 locks held by kworker/u208:1/13:
#0: ((wq_completion)bnxt_pf_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x8f7/0x13b0
#1: ((work_completion)(&(&bp->fw_reset_task)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x917/0x13b0
#2: (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bnxt_fw_reset_task+0x7ed/0x1e80
stack backtrace:
CPU: 38 UID: 0 PID: 13 Comm: kworker/u208:1 Tainted: G E
Hardware name: Wiwynn Delta Lake MP/Delta Lake-Class1, BIOS Y3DL405 11/21/2025
Workqueue: bnxt_pf_wq bnxt_fw_reset_task
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x69/0xa0
lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x13f/0x1d0
dev_qdisc_change_real_num_tx+0x54/0xe0
netif_set_real_num_tx_queues+0x4ed/0xa80
__bnxt_open_nic+0x9cb/0x3490
? bnxt_hwrm_if_change+0x4fd/0x620
bnxt_open+0x1cb/0x370
bnxt_fw_reset_task+0x80d/0x1e80
process_scheduled_works+0x9c1/0x13b0
worker_thread+0x90d/0xd20
kthread+0x320/0x3f0
ret_from_fork+0x2b6/0xb00
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
</TASK>
Bisect / analysis
-----------------
This looks like a regression from:
850d9248d2ea ("Revert "bnxt_en: bring back rtnl_lock() in the
bnxt_open() path"")
That revert dropped rtnl_lock() from the bnxt_open() paths and left
bnxt_fw_reset_task() holding only the instance lock around bnxt_open().
I can send a patch restoring rtnl_lock() around the bnxt_open() call in
bnxt_fw_reset_task() (re-taking rtnl before the instance lock, matching the
pre-revert code), but I wanted to report it first to make sure I am in the
right direction.
Please let me know how you would like to proceed.
Thanks,
Breno
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 15:33 Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-06-02 17:49 ` bnxt_en: suspicious RCU usage in bnxt_fw_reset_task() qdisc path in 7.1-rc6 Stanislav Fomichev
2026-06-02 18:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-06-02 17:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-03 11:43 ` Breno Leitao
2026-06-03 17:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ah726OtFX-Qw3U-R@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox