From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce helpers for setting UMEM properties
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 16:52:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiA/vvEkP0Sp8kUQ@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603060327.298389-2-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:33:24AM +0530, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> UMEM properties are set via open-coded field assignments in multiple test
> paths, which makes updates noisy and error-prone.
>
> Introduce two helpers to set UMEM properties through a single interface.
> This keeps setup logic consistent across tests and makes future refactoring
> simpler.
>
> No functional behavior change is intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c | 36 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> index 7950c504ed28..3369450da974 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,18 @@ static void test_spec_reset(struct test_spec *test)
> __test_spec_init(test, test->ifobj_tx, test->ifobj_rx);
> }
>
> +static void test_spec_set_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
> +{
> + test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> + test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_spec_set_frame_size(struct test_spec *test, u32 size)
> +{
> + test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = size;
> + test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = size;
> +}
> +
> static void test_spec_set_xdp_prog(struct test_spec *test, struct bpf_program *xdp_prog_rx,
> struct bpf_program *xdp_prog_tx, struct bpf_map *xskmap_rx,
> struct bpf_map *xskmap_tx)
> @@ -2025,8 +2037,7 @@ int testapp_stats_fill_empty(struct test_spec *test)
>
> int testapp_send_receive_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> + test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
> /* Let half of the packets straddle a 4K buffer boundary */
> if (pkt_stream_replace_half(test, MIN_PKT_SIZE, -MIN_PKT_SIZE / 2))
> return TEST_FAILURE;
> @@ -2037,8 +2048,7 @@ int testapp_send_receive_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
> int testapp_send_receive_unaligned_mb(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> test->mtu = MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE;
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> + test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
> if (pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE))
> return TEST_FAILURE;
> return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> @@ -2337,8 +2347,7 @@ int testapp_send_receive(struct test_spec *test)
>
> int testapp_send_receive_2k_frame(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> + test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 2048);
> if (pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MIN_PKT_SIZE))
> return TEST_FAILURE;
> return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> @@ -2363,15 +2372,13 @@ int testapp_aligned_inv_desc(struct test_spec *test)
>
> int testapp_aligned_inv_desc_2k_frame(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> + test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 2048);
> return testapp_invalid_desc(test);
> }
>
> int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> + test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
> return testapp_invalid_desc(test);
> }
>
> @@ -2380,10 +2387,8 @@ int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_4001_frame(struct test_spec *test)
> u64 page_size, umem_size;
>
> /* Odd frame size so the UMEM doesn't end near a page boundary. */
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 4001;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 4001;
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> + test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 4001);
> + test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
> /* This test exists to test descriptors that staddle the end of
> * the UMEM but not a page.
> */
> @@ -2402,8 +2407,7 @@ int testapp_aligned_inv_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
>
> int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> - test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> - test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> + test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
> return testapp_invalid_desc_mb(test);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 6:03 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] selftests/xsk: simplify UMEM setup Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce helpers for setting UMEM properties Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 14:52 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-06-03 6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] selftests/xsk: Move UMEM state from ifobject to xsk_socket_info Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 14:51 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-03 6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] selftests/xsk: Use umem_size() helper consistently Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 15:34 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-03 6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce mmap_size in umem struct Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 15:35 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiA/vvEkP0Sp8kUQ@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox