Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce mmap_size in umem struct
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 17:35:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiBJqLO24O9k1QzG@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603060327.298389-5-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:33:27AM +0530, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> UMEM teardown currently recomputes the munmap() length from frame
> geometry, shared-UMEM adjustment, and hugepage rounding. This duplicates
> setup-time logic in cleanup and relies on re-deriving the mapping size
> instead of using the size originally established for the mapping.
> 
> Store the final mapping length in xsk_umem_info as mmap_size when the
> UMEM mapping is created, and use that value during teardown.
> 
> Also join the RX worker thread before cleanup in the single-thread
> path. This establishes synchronization before reading umem->mmap_size
> in teardown and avoids a potential visibility race.
> 
> This removes duplicated size arithmetic in cleanup and makes munmap()
> use the canonical mapping size recorded at setup time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c       | 20 +++++++++----------
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.h       |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> index f1730466ffd9..e94c38a1faf4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> @@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ static int thread_common_ops(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobject)
>  	struct xsk_umem_info *umem = ifobject->xsk->umem;
>  	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_xdp_query_opts, opts);
>  	int mmap_flags;
> -	u64 umem_sz;
> +	u64 umem_sz, mmap_sz;
>  	void *bufs;
>  	int ret;
>  	u32 i;
> @@ -1595,10 +1595,15 @@ static int thread_common_ops(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobject)
>  	if (ifobject->shared_umem)
>  		umem_sz *= 2;
>  
> -	bufs = mmap(NULL, umem_sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, mmap_flags, -1, 0);
> +	mmap_sz = umem->unaligned_mode ?
> +		ceil_u64(umem_sz, HUGEPAGE_SIZE) * HUGEPAGE_SIZE : umem_sz;
> +
> +	bufs = mmap(NULL, mmap_sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, mmap_flags, -1, 0);
>  	if (bufs == MAP_FAILED)
>  		return -errno;
>  
> +	umem->mmap_size = mmap_sz;
> +
>  	ret = xsk_configure_umem(ifobject, umem, bufs, umem_sz);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -1706,15 +1711,9 @@ void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
>  static void testapp_clean_xsk_umem(struct ifobject *ifobj)
>  {
>  	struct xsk_umem_info *umem = ifobj->xsk->umem;
> -	u64 umem_sz = umem_size(umem);
> -
> -	if (ifobj->shared_umem)
> -		umem_sz *= 2;
> -
> -	umem_sz = ceil_u64(umem_sz, HUGEPAGE_SIZE) * HUGEPAGE_SIZE;
>  
>  	xsk_umem__delete(umem->umem);
> -	munmap(umem->buffer, umem_sz);
> +	munmap(umem->buffer, umem->mmap_size);
>  }
>  
>  static void handler(int signum)
> @@ -1857,8 +1856,7 @@ static int __testapp_validate_traffic(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *i
>  
>  	if (!ifobj2)
>  		pthread_kill(t0, SIGUSR1);
> -	else
> -		pthread_join(t0, NULL);
> +	pthread_join(t0, NULL);
>  
>  	if (test->total_steps == test->current_step || test->fail) {
>  		clean_sockets(test, ifobj1);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.h
> index 99003995d7c3..4313d0d87235 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct xsk_umem_info {
>  	struct xsk_ring_cons cq;
>  	struct xsk_umem *umem;
>  	u64 next_buffer;
> +	u64 mmap_size;
>  	u32 num_frames;
>  	u32 frame_headroom;
>  	void *buffer;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-03  6:03 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] selftests/xsk: simplify UMEM setup Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce helpers for setting UMEM properties Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 14:52   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] selftests/xsk: Move UMEM state from ifobject to xsk_socket_info Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 14:51   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] selftests/xsk: Use umem_size() helper consistently Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 15:34   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce mmap_size in umem struct Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 15:35   ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aiBJqLO24O9k1QzG@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
    --cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox