From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<donald.hunter@gmail.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<horms@kernel.org>, <jiri@resnulli.us>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 07:47:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiYmP_69I_pTCh7h@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605063245.3553861-2-rkannoth@marvell.com>
On 2026-06-05 at 12:02:37, Ratheesh Kannoth (rkannoth@marvell.com) wrote:
> There is only one admin-function PCI device per system.
> Reject any additional AF probe with -EBUSY so the driver model matches
> hardware and automated reviewers can rely on a single bound instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605063245.3553861-1-rkannoth%40marvell.com says
>> static int rvu_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct rvu *rvu;
>> int err;
>>
>> + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&device_bound, 0, 1) != 0) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Only one af device is supported.\n");
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>Since this atomic_cmpxchg() sets device_bound to 1, is there a path that sets
>it back to 0?
>Looking at rvu_probe(), if a failure occurs later in the probe process
>(such as -ENOMEM or resource allocation failures), it jumps to the cleanup
>labels but does not clear the device_bound flag. Does this permanently
>prevent driver rebinding or retry on probe deferral?
>Additionally, when the driver is successfully unbound via rvu_remove(),
>the flag doesn't appear to be cleared there either, which would cause
>subsequent manual binds to fail with -EBUSY.
>Is there a missing atomic_set(&device_bound, 0) in the error paths and in
>rvu_remove()?
You are right. The current implementation lacks
transactional rollback for device_bound in
rvu_probe() error paths, as well as the corresponding reset
in rvu_remove().
The inclusion of atomic_cmpxchg() here is a proactive sanity
check to enforce the hardware paradigm, as firmware instantiates
only a single Admin Function (AF) PCI device. Sashiko had raised many race
issues in previous version of the patch, assuming that multiple AF device
can be probed.
However, full
error-handling path hardening and proper resource cleanup for
the AF driver are currently incomplete.
To prevent scope creep in this fundamental enablement series, we
plan to address the comprehensive error-path rollback—including
proper atomic_set(&device_bound, 0) invocations on probe failure
and driver detachment—in a dedicated, subsequent hardening
patchset targeted for net-next.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 6:32 [PATCH v19 net-next 0/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:17 ` Ratheesh Kannoth [this message]
2026-06-08 2:25 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 22:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 1:43 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-09 2:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 2:26 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-09 2:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 2/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: debugfs enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:20 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:26 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 3/9] devlink: heap-allocate param fill buffers in devlink_nl_param_fill Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 4/9] devlink: Implement devlink param multi attribute nested data values Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 5/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: add subbank search order control Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:22 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:28 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 6/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Coordinate default rules with NIX LF lifecycle Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:29 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 7/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Support for custom KPU profile from filesystem Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:23 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:30 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 8/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Respect NPC MCAM X2/X4 profile in flows and DFT alloc Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:24 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:31 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 9/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate npc_priv and dstats dynamically Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:25 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:32 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-05 3:50 [PATCH v19 net-next 0/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 3:50 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 7:47 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiYmP_69I_pTCh7h@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090 \
--to=rkannoth@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox