Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<donald.hunter@gmail.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
	<horms@kernel.org>, <jiri@resnulli.us>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 07:47:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiYmP_69I_pTCh7h@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605063245.3553861-2-rkannoth@marvell.com>

On 2026-06-05 at 12:02:37, Ratheesh Kannoth (rkannoth@marvell.com) wrote:
> There is only one admin-function PCI device per system.
> Reject any additional AF probe with -EBUSY so the driver model matches
> hardware and automated reviewers can rely on a single bound instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605063245.3553861-1-rkannoth%40marvell.com says

>>  static int rvu_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>  {
>>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>  	struct rvu *rvu;
>>  	int    err;
>>
>> +	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&device_bound, 0, 1) != 0) {
>> +		dev_warn(dev, "Only one af device is supported.\n");
>> +		return -EBUSY;
>> +	}
>> +
>Since this atomic_cmpxchg() sets device_bound to 1, is there a path that sets
>it back to 0?
>Looking at rvu_probe(), if a failure occurs later in the probe process
>(such as -ENOMEM or resource allocation failures), it jumps to the cleanup
>labels but does not clear the device_bound flag. Does this permanently
>prevent driver rebinding or retry on probe deferral?
>Additionally, when the driver is successfully unbound via rvu_remove(),
>the flag doesn't appear to be cleared there either, which would cause
>subsequent manual binds to fail with -EBUSY.
>Is there a missing atomic_set(&device_bound, 0) in the error paths and in
>rvu_remove()?

You are right. The current implementation lacks
transactional rollback for device_bound in
rvu_probe() error paths, as well as the corresponding reset
in rvu_remove().

The inclusion of atomic_cmpxchg() here is a proactive sanity
check to enforce the hardware paradigm, as firmware instantiates
only a single Admin Function (AF) PCI device. Sashiko had raised many race
issues in previous version of the patch, assuming that multiple AF device
can be probed.

However, full
error-handling path hardening and proper resource cleanup for
the AF driver are currently incomplete.

To prevent scope creep in this fundamental enablement series, we
plan to address the comprehensive error-path rollback—including
proper atomic_set(&device_bound, 0) invocations on probe failure
and driver detachment—in a dedicated, subsequent hardening
patchset targeted for net-next.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05  6:32 [PATCH v19 net-next 0/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:17   ` Ratheesh Kannoth [this message]
2026-06-08  2:25   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 22:40   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09  1:43     ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-09  2:02       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09  2:26         ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-09  2:41           ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 2/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: debugfs enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:20   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:26   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 3/9] devlink: heap-allocate param fill buffers in devlink_nl_param_fill Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 4/9] devlink: Implement devlink param multi attribute nested data values Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 5/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: add subbank search order control Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:22   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:28   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 6/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Coordinate default rules with NIX LF lifecycle Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:29   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 7/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Support for custom KPU profile from filesystem Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:23   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:30   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 8/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Respect NPC MCAM X2/X4 profile in flows and DFT alloc Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:24   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:31   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 9/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate npc_priv and dstats dynamically Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:25   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08  2:32   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-05  3:50 [PATCH v19 net-next 0/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  3:50 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05  7:47   ` Ratheesh Kannoth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aiYmP_69I_pTCh7h@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090 \
    --to=rkannoth@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox