From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<donald.hunter@gmail.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<horms@kernel.org>, <jiri@resnulli.us>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 net-next 6/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Coordinate default rules with NIX LF lifecycle
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 07:59:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiYo-wl9FrsRq9N_@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605063245.3553861-7-rkannoth@marvell.com>
On 2026-06-05 at 12:02:42, Ratheesh Kannoth (rkannoth@marvell.com) wrote:
> Add NIX_LF_DONT_FREE_DFT_IDXS so the PF can send NIX LF free during hw
> reinit or teardown without the AF freeing CN20K default NPC rule indexes
> while the driver still owns that state (otx2_init_hw_resources and
> otx2_free_hw_resources).
>
> On CN20K, allocate default NPC rules from NIX LF alloc before
> nix_interface_init, roll back with npc_cn20k_dft_rules_free on failure,
> and free from NIX LF free when the new flag is not set. Tighten
> rvu_mbox_handler_nix_lf_alloc error handling: use a single rc, propagate
> qmem_alloc and other errors, and set -ENOMEM only when kcalloc fails
> (remove the blanket -ENOMEM at the free_mem path).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260605063245.3553861-1-rkannoth%40marvell.com says
>> intf = NIX_INTF_TYPE_SDP;
>>
>> - err = nix_interface_init(rvu, pcifunc, intf, nixlf, rsp,
>> - !!(req->flags & NIX_LF_LBK_BLK_SEL));
>> - if (err)
>> - goto free_mem;
>> + if (is_cn20k(rvu->pdev)) {
>> + rc = npc_cn20k_dft_rules_idx_get(rvu, pcifunc, &bcast, &mcast,
>> + &promisc, &ucast);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + rc = npc_cn20k_dft_rules_alloc(rvu, pcifunc);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto free_mem;
>> +
>> + rules_created = true;
>> + }
>> + }
>Does the rules_created flag faithfully reflect whether allocation
>actually happened?
>npc_cn20k_dft_rules_alloc() returns 0 without doing any work when the
>pcifunc is not CGX or LBK mapped (for example SDP):
> if (!npc_is_cgx_or_lbk(rvu, pcifunc)) {
> dev_dbg(rvu->dev,
> "%s: dft rule allocation is only for cgx mapped device, pcifunc=%#x\n",
> __func__, pcifunc);
> return 0;
> }
>For such a pcifunc, npc_cn20k_dft_rules_idx_get() returns -ESRCH, the
>if branch is taken, dft_rules_alloc() is a no-op returning 0, and
>rules_created becomes true even though no rule was created.
>The free_dft path then calls npc_cn20k_dft_rules_free(), which itself
>early-returns on the same !npc_is_cgx_or_lbk predicate, so the safety
>relies on that hidden coupling rather than an explicit signal.
>Would it be clearer to have npc_cn20k_dft_rules_alloc() return a
>distinct created/not-created indication, or to gate rules_created on
>npc_is_cgx_or_lbk(rvu, pcifunc) at the call site?
>> +
dft rules are only for cgx/lbk interfaces. So for sdp, eventhough npc_cn20k_dft_rules_alloc() returns 0
and rules_created is set to true, failure case, it will call dft_rules_free(), but there is nothing
to free. So this will work.
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc.c
>> @@ -4085,12 +4095,10 @@ void rvu_npc_clear_ucast_entry(struct rvu *rvu, int pcifunc, int nixlf)
>>
>> ucast_idx = npc_get_nixlf_mcam_index(mcam, pcifunc,
>> nixlf, NIXLF_UCAST_ENTRY);
>> - if (ucast_idx < 0) {
>> - dev_err(rvu->dev,
>> - "%s: Error to get ucast entry for pcifunc=%#x\n",
>> - __func__, pcifunc);
>> +
>> + /* In cn20k, default rules are freed before detach rsrc */
>> + if (ucast_idx < 0)
>> return;
>> - }
>The comment says this silent return is for the CN20K case where default
>rules are freed before detach rsrc, but the change drops the dev_err
>unconditionally for every silicon that reaches rvu_npc_clear_ucast_entry()
>via the generic rvu_detach_block() path, including CN10K and OcteonTX2.
>On legacy silicon a negative ucast_idx was previously treated as
>exceptional and worth logging; should this silent return be gated on
>is_cn20k(rvu->pdev) so the dev_err is preserved for the other variants?
No. In cn10k, ucast entry is not dynamic, so it is treated as error. This is
a teardown path, so want to keep same code for cn10k and cn20k.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 6:32 [PATCH v19 net-next 0/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:17 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:25 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 22:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 1:43 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-09 2:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 2:26 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-09 2:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 2/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: debugfs enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:20 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:26 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 3/9] devlink: heap-allocate param fill buffers in devlink_nl_param_fill Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 4/9] devlink: Implement devlink param multi attribute nested data values Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 5/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: add subbank search order control Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:22 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:28 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 6/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Coordinate default rules with NIX LF lifecycle Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:29 ` Ratheesh Kannoth [this message]
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 7/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Support for custom KPU profile from filesystem Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:23 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:30 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 8/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Respect NPC MCAM X2/X4 profile in flows and DFT alloc Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:24 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:31 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 9/9] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate npc_priv and dstats dynamically Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:25 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-08 2:32 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-05 3:50 [PATCH v19 net-next 0/9] octeontx2-af: npc: Enhancements Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-05 3:50 ` [PATCH v19 net-next 6/9] octeontx2: cn20k: Coordinate default rules with NIX LF lifecycle Ratheesh Kannoth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiYo-wl9FrsRq9N_@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090 \
--to=rkannoth@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox