Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/4] dpll: add DPLL_PIN_TYPE_INT_NCO pin type

[Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>]

Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 07:03:46PM +0200, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
>>From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>>Sent: Monday, June 8, 2026 5:48 PM
>>
>>On 6/8/26 4:43 PM, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
>>>> From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2026 9:44 PM
>>>> ...
>>>>        -
>>>>          name: gnss
>>>>          doc: GNSS recovered clock
>>>> +      -
>>>> +        name: int-nco
>>>> +        doc: |
>>>> +          Device internal numerically controlled oscillator.
>>>> +          When connected as a DPLL input, the DPLL enters NCO mode
>>>> +          where the output frequency is adjusted by the host via
>>>> +          the PTP clock interface.
>>>
>>> Hi Ivan!
>>>
>>> How would you control this in case of automatic mode dpll?
>>> Automatic mode DPLL shall be controlled on HW level, such pin brakes
>>> that rule and requires some driver magic to show it is higher
>>> priority then the rest of the pins?
>>
>>The NCO pin can be connected only in manual mode. In other words a DPLL
>>in automatic mode cannot select NCO pin (switch to NCO mode) by its own.
>>
>
>Being picky on DPLL_MODE for enabling feature is not something we can
>allow if it is not related to HW limitation, is it?
>Could you please elaborate why it is not possible for AUTOMATIC mode?

In automatic mode, the pin selection logic is defined upon prio. I can
imagine that if NCO pin has the highest prio of the available ones,
it gets picked. I would be aligned 100% with automatic mode behaviour.
Is there a real usecase for it?

[..]