* [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: policy: preallocate inexact bins before xfrm_hash_rebuild reinsert
@ 2026-07-03 5:19 Xiang Mei (Microsoft)
2026-07-03 5:47 ` Florian Westphal
2026-07-03 6:18 ` Manuel Ebner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) @ 2026-07-03 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fw, steffen.klassert, herbert, davem, netdev
Cc: horms, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, AutonomousCodeSecurity, tgopinath,
kys, Xiang Mei (Microsoft)
xfrm_hash_rebuild()'s first loop preallocates the bins/chains the reinsert
loop needs, so the reinsert (after hlist_del_rcu()) cannot allocate or
fail. But its guard is inverted: it skips policies with prefixlen <
threshold and preallocates for the rest.
prefixlen < threshold is exactly when policy_hash_bysel() returns NULL and
the reinsert takes the allocating xfrm_policy_inexact_insert() path. So the
loop preallocates for the exact policies (which never allocate) and skips
the inexact ones, whose bin/node is then allocated GFP_ATOMIC during
reinsert. On failure the error path only WARN_ONCE()s and continues,
leaving a poisoned bydst node; the next rebuild's hlist_del_rcu()
dereferences LIST_POISON2 and takes a GPF. Reachable under memory pressure,
deterministic via failslab.
Invert the guard so preallocation covers exactly the reinserted policies;
the reinsert then allocates nothing and cannot fail.
Crash:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead...]
...
Workqueue: events xfrm_hash_rebuild
RIP: 0010:xfrm_hash_rebuild+0x5b3/0x1190
RAX: dead000000000122 (LIST_POISON2 + offset)
...
Call Trace:
hlist_del_rcu (include/linux/rculist.h:599)
xfrm_hash_rebuild (net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1365)
process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3322)
worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3486)
kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)
ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158)
ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)
...
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Fixes: 24969facd704 ("xfrm: policy: store inexact policies in an rhashtable")
Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
---
v2: fix the inverted preallocation guard (root cause)
instead of avoiding crash
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 7ef861a0e823..932a313b9460 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
- if (policy->selector.prefixlen_d < dbits ||
- policy->selector.prefixlen_s < sbits)
+ if (policy->selector.prefixlen_d >= dbits &&
+ policy->selector.prefixlen_s >= sbits)
continue;
bin = xfrm_policy_inexact_alloc_bin(policy, dir);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: policy: preallocate inexact bins before xfrm_hash_rebuild reinsert
2026-07-03 5:19 [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: policy: preallocate inexact bins before xfrm_hash_rebuild reinsert Xiang Mei (Microsoft)
@ 2026-07-03 5:47 ` Florian Westphal
2026-07-07 6:35 ` Steffen Klassert
2026-07-03 6:18 ` Manuel Ebner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2026-07-03 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiang Mei (Microsoft)
Cc: steffen.klassert, herbert, davem, netdev, horms, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni, AutonomousCodeSecurity, tgopinath, kys
Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu> wrote:
> xfrm_hash_rebuild()'s first loop preallocates the bins/chains the reinsert
> loop needs, so the reinsert (after hlist_del_rcu()) cannot allocate or
> fail. But its guard is inverted: it skips policies with prefixlen <
> threshold and preallocates for the rest.
>
> prefixlen < threshold is exactly when policy_hash_bysel() returns NULL and
> the reinsert takes the allocating xfrm_policy_inexact_insert() path. So the
> loop preallocates for the exact policies (which never allocate) and skips
> the inexact ones, whose bin/node is then allocated GFP_ATOMIC during
> reinsert. On failure the error path only WARN_ONCE()s and continues,
> leaving a poisoned bydst node; the next rebuild's hlist_del_rcu()
> dereferences LIST_POISON2 and takes a GPF. Reachable under memory pressure,
> deterministic via failslab.
>
> Invert the guard so preallocation covers exactly the reinserted policies;
> the reinsert then allocates nothing and cannot fail.
>
> Crash:
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> 0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead...]
> ...
> Workqueue: events xfrm_hash_rebuild
> RIP: 0010:xfrm_hash_rebuild+0x5b3/0x1190
> RAX: dead000000000122 (LIST_POISON2 + offset)
> ...
> Call Trace:
> hlist_del_rcu (include/linux/rculist.h:599)
> xfrm_hash_rebuild (net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1365)
> process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3322)
> worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3486)
> kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)
> ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158)
> ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)
> ...
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> Fixes: 24969facd704 ("xfrm: policy: store inexact policies in an rhashtable")
> Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
> Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: policy: preallocate inexact bins before xfrm_hash_rebuild reinsert
2026-07-03 5:19 [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: policy: preallocate inexact bins before xfrm_hash_rebuild reinsert Xiang Mei (Microsoft)
2026-07-03 5:47 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2026-07-03 6:18 ` Manuel Ebner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Ebner @ 2026-07-03 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiang Mei (Microsoft), fw, steffen.klassert, herbert, davem,
netdev
Cc: horms, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, AutonomousCodeSecurity, tgopinath,
kys
Hi Xiang Mei
On Fri, 2026-07-03 at 05:19 +0000, Xiang Mei (Microsoft) wrote:
> xfrm_hash_rebuild()'s first loop preallocates the bins/chains the reinsert
> loop needs, so the reinsert (after hlist_del_rcu()) cannot allocate or
> fail.
This sentence is difficult to understand for me. Can it be simplified or changed?
This would help a little:
xfrm_hash_rebuild()'s first loop preallocates the bins/chains which the reinsert
loop needs. In this case the reinsert ...
> But its guard is inverted: it skips policies with prefixlen <
> threshold and preallocates for the rest.
>
> prefixlen < threshold is exactly when policy_hash_bysel() returns NULL and
> the reinsert takes the allocating xfrm_policy_inexact_insert() path. So the
> loop preallocates for the exact policies (which never allocate) and skips
> the inexact ones, whose bin/node is then allocated GFP_ATOMIC during
> reinsert. On failure the error path only WARN_ONCE()s and continues,
> leaving a poisoned bydst node;
what's 'bydst'?
> the next rebuild's hlist_del_rcu()
> dereferences LIST_POISON2 and takes a GPF.
/GPF/GFP/
Thanks
Manuel
> Reachable under memory pressure,
> deterministic via failslab.
>
> Invert the guard so preallocation covers exactly the reinserted policies;
> the reinsert then allocates nothing and cannot fail.
>
> Crash:
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> 0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead...]
> ...
> Workqueue: events xfrm_hash_rebuild
> RIP: 0010:xfrm_hash_rebuild+0x5b3/0x1190
> RAX: dead000000000122 (LIST_POISON2 + offset)
> ...
> Call Trace:
> hlist_del_rcu (include/linux/rculist.h:599)
> xfrm_hash_rebuild (net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1365)
> process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3322)
> worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3486)
> kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)
> ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158)
> ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)
> ...
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> Fixes: 24969facd704 ("xfrm: policy: store inexact policies in an rhashtable")
> Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
> Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
> ---
> v2: fix the inverted preallocation guard (root cause)
> instead of avoiding crash
>
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index 7ef861a0e823..932a313b9460 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
> }
> }
>
> - if (policy->selector.prefixlen_d < dbits ||
> - policy->selector.prefixlen_s < sbits)
> + if (policy->selector.prefixlen_d >= dbits &&
> + policy->selector.prefixlen_s >= sbits)
> continue;
>
> bin = xfrm_policy_inexact_alloc_bin(policy, dir);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: policy: preallocate inexact bins before xfrm_hash_rebuild reinsert
2026-07-03 5:47 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2026-07-07 6:35 ` Steffen Klassert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Klassert @ 2026-07-07 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: Xiang Mei (Microsoft), herbert, davem, netdev, horms, edumazet,
kuba, pabeni, AutonomousCodeSecurity, tgopinath, kys
On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu> wrote:
> > xfrm_hash_rebuild()'s first loop preallocates the bins/chains the reinsert
> > loop needs, so the reinsert (after hlist_del_rcu()) cannot allocate or
> > fail. But its guard is inverted: it skips policies with prefixlen <
> > threshold and preallocates for the rest.
> >
> > prefixlen < threshold is exactly when policy_hash_bysel() returns NULL and
> > the reinsert takes the allocating xfrm_policy_inexact_insert() path. So the
> > loop preallocates for the exact policies (which never allocate) and skips
> > the inexact ones, whose bin/node is then allocated GFP_ATOMIC during
> > reinsert. On failure the error path only WARN_ONCE()s and continues,
> > leaving a poisoned bydst node; the next rebuild's hlist_del_rcu()
> > dereferences LIST_POISON2 and takes a GPF. Reachable under memory pressure,
> > deterministic via failslab.
> >
> > Invert the guard so preallocation covers exactly the reinserted policies;
> > the reinsert then allocates nothing and cannot fail.
> >
> > Crash:
> > Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> > 0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> > KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead...]
> > ...
> > Workqueue: events xfrm_hash_rebuild
> > RIP: 0010:xfrm_hash_rebuild+0x5b3/0x1190
> > RAX: dead000000000122 (LIST_POISON2 + offset)
> > ...
> > Call Trace:
> > hlist_del_rcu (include/linux/rculist.h:599)
> > xfrm_hash_rebuild (net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1365)
> > process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3322)
> > worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3486)
> > kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)
> > ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158)
> > ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)
> > ...
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
> >
> > Fixes: 24969facd704 ("xfrm: policy: store inexact policies in an rhashtable")
> > Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
> > Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Applied, thanks everyone!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-07 6:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-03 5:19 [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: policy: preallocate inexact bins before xfrm_hash_rebuild reinsert Xiang Mei (Microsoft)
2026-07-03 5:47 ` Florian Westphal
2026-07-07 6:35 ` Steffen Klassert
2026-07-03 6:18 ` Manuel Ebner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox