[PATCH bpf-next v11 0/5] bpf: add icmp_send kfunc

[PATCH bpf-next v11 0/5] bpf: add icmp_send kfunc

[Mahe Tardy]

Hello,

This is v11 of adding the icmp_send kfunc, as suggested during
LSF/MM/BPF 2025[^1]. The goal is to allow cgroup_skb programs to
actively reject east-west traffic, similarly to what is possible to do
with netfilter reject target. Applications can receive early feedback
that something went wrong during the TCP handshake.

The first step to implement this is using ICMP control messages, with
the ICMP_DEST_UNREACH type with various code ICMP_NET_UNREACH,
ICMP_HOST_UNREACH, ICMP_PROT_UNREACH, etc. This is easier to implement
than a TCP RST reply and will already hint the client TCP stack to abort
the connection and not retry extensively.

Note that this is different than the sock_destroy kfunc, that along
calls tcp_abort and thus sends a reset, destroying the underlying
socket.

Caveats of this kfunc design are that a program can call this function N
times, thus send N ICMP unreach control messages and that the program
can return from the BPF filter with pass leading to a potential
confusing situation where the TCP connection was established while the
client received ICMP_DEST_UNREACH messages.

v2 updates:
- fix a build error from a missing function call rename;
- avoid changing return line in bpf_kfunc_init;
- return SK_DROP from the kfunc (similarly to bpf_redirect);
- check the return value in the selftest.

v3 update:
- fix an undefined reference build error.

v4 updates:
- prevent the kfunc to be called recursively and add a test (thanks to
  Martin).
- do not fetch dst route when unnecessary (thanks to Martin).
- extend the test for IPv6 (thanks to Martin).
- use SK_DROP in examples and use non blocking sockets for testing
  (thanks to Martin).
- test when the kfunc returns -EINVAL (thanks to Jordan).
- add the kfunc to bpf_kfunc_set_skb as suggested by Alexei.
- guard the IPv4 parts with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET).
- fix a wrong initial value for client_fd (thanks to Yonghong).
- add documentation to the kfunc.
- to Jordan: I couldn't include <linux/icmp.h> because of redefines from
  <network_helpers.h>.

v5 updates:
- kfunc name is now icmp_send and takes the control message type as
  parameter for future potential extension (daniel)
- drop the net patches to route packet since now the kfunc is limited to
  cgroup_skb and tc progs (daniel & martin)
- linearize skb headers (sashiko)
- zero SKB control block (sashiko)
- bind to port 0 instead of fixed port (sashiko)
- poll to wait for POLLERR event (sashiko)
- do not use ASSERT_EQ in CMSG_NXTHDR loop (sashiko)
- fix comment about byte order (sashiko)
- fix endianness IP address issue (sashiko)
- add forgotten cleanup_cgroup_environment (sashiko)
- let packets pass in recursion test (sashiko)
- clarify evaluation order for recursion test (sashiko)

v6 updates (all from sashiko):
- bring back the net patches to route packet since tc ingress needs it.
- rename the ip_route_reply helpers from fetch to fill.
- call pskb_network_may_pull on the cloned pkt.
- check explicitly that we received one and only one ICMP err ctrl msg.

v7 updates:
- use consume_skb on success path (stanislav)
- replace recursion protection with CPU_ARRAY by checking the nature of
  the sk (daniel, offline)
- use reverse xmas tree in read_icmp_errqueue (jordan)
- use ASSERT_OK_FD instead of ASSERT_GE whenever possible (jordan)
- add a test for tc (jordan)
- better filtering from host cgroup test progs (sashiko)

v8 updates:
- mostly a resend as it's been sitting as "New" in the queue for almost
  one month, fixed a few nits.
- on new bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb test (patch 4/7):
  - guard a close fd with fd >= 0 (jordan)
  - use ASSERT_OK_FD instead of ASSERT_GE (jordan)
  - fixed comment style (sashiko)
- on recursion test (patch 7/7):
  - guard a close fd with fd >= 0 (jordan)
  - fixed comments style (sashiko)
  - filter bpf prog on pid and ICMP message types (sashiko)

v9 updates:
- first, there was a v8.5 that I discussed here[^2] with Emil
  Tsalapatis. I tried once again to make tc work but the ai review found
  something fundamentally wrong. This version removes the tc support for
  now and focuses on cgroup_skb.
- use helper get_socket_local_port instead of getsockname (sashiko)
- use if_nametoindex("lo") instead of value 1 (bpf-ci)
- fix IPV6_RECVERR appearance before IPv6 patch (bpf-ci)
- precise that 0 on success mean icmp_send was called but it was just an
  attempt since this function does not return anything (sashiko)
- explicitly consider ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED as invalid in bpf_icmp_send as
  it would miss the next-hop MTU info. Also test it. (sashiko)
- test for max_code + 1 for invalid (sashiko)
- add review-by tags from Jordan and Emil but remove it on the main
  patch as I have significantly changed it.
- check for rec_count in recursion test (sashiko)
- re-order setup_cgroup_environmment in test (sashiko)
- reset kfunc_ret on every test run (sashiko)
- check for skb route for icmp_send as the function would quietly fail
  and add a test (sashiko)

v10 updates:
- guard against skbs with metadata_dst before calling icmpv6_send
  (sashiko)
- add more review-by tags from Emil and Jordan.

v11 updates:
- move !skb_valid_dst(skb) check to both ipv4 and ipv6 (daniel)

[^1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/1022034/
[^2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ajvDRCw8cPqXAqQq@gmail.com/

Link to v10: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260625110321.28236-1-mahe.tardy@gmail.com/

Mahe Tardy (5):
  bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc
  selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb tests
  selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb IPv6 tests
  selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test
  selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send no route test

 net/core/filter.c                             |  90 ++++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c          | 292 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c | 123 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 505 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c

--
2.34.1

[PATCH bpf-next v11 1/5] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc

[Mahe Tardy]

This is needed in the context of Tetragon to provide improved feedback
(in contrast to just dropping packets) to east-west traffic when blocked
by policies using cgroup_skb programs.

This reuses concepts from netfilter reject target codepath with the
differences that:
* Packets are cloned since the BPF user can still let the packet pass
  (SK_PASS from the cgroup_skb progs for example) and the current skb
  need to stay untouched (cgroup_skb hooks only allow read-only skb
  payload).
* We protect against recursion since the kfunc, by generating an ICMP
  error message, could retrigger the BPF prog that invoked it.

Only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH and ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH are currently supported.
The interface accepts a type parameter to facilitate future extension to
other ICMP control message types.

For normal cgroup_skb paths, the skb dst route should already be set.
However, bpf_prog_test_run_skb can create synthetic IPv4/IPv6 skbs
without an attached route. In that case, icmp_send returns early, and
the kfunc would otherwise report success despite no ICMP reply being
sent. This check also reject metadata dsts, which are not valid struct
rtable instances. While IPv6 would stricly require only rejecting
metadata dsts, same check is applied for API consistency.

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 4f5cbcac3e78..e4697036c67b 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@
 #include <linux/un.h>
 #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
 #include <net/inet_dscp.h>
+#include <linux/icmpv6.h>
+#include <net/icmp.h>
+#include <net/ip6_route.h>

 #include "dev.h"

@@ -12548,6 +12551,83 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_xdp_pull_data(struct xdp_md *x, u32 len)
 	return 0;
 }

+/**
+ * bpf_icmp_send - Send an ICMP control message
+ * @skb_ctx: Packet that triggered the control message
+ * @type: ICMP type (only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH/ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH supported)
+ * @code: ICMP code (0-15 except ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED for IPv4, 0-6 for IPv6)
+ *
+ * Sends an ICMP control message in response to the packet. The original packet
+ * is cloned before sending the ICMP message, so the BPF program can still let
+ * the packet pass if desired.
+ *
+ * Currently only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH (IPv4) and ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH (IPv6) are
+ * supported.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success (send attempt), negative error code on failure:
+ *         -EBUSY: Recursion detected
+ *         -EPROTONOSUPPORT: Non-IP protocol
+ *         -EOPNOTSUPP: Unsupported ICMP type
+ *         -EINVAL: Invalid code parameter
+ *         -ENETUNREACH: No usable route/dst for the ICMP reply
+ *         -ENOMEM: Memory allocation failed
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_icmp_send(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx, int type, int code)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
+	struct sk_buff *nskb;
+	struct sock *sk;
+
+	sk = skb_to_full_sk(skb);
+	if (sk && sk->sk_kern_sock &&
+	    (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP || sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_ICMPV6))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	if (!skb_valid_dst(skb))
+		return -ENETUNREACH;
+
+	switch (skb->protocol) {
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
+	case htons(ETH_P_IP): {
+		if (type != ICMP_DEST_UNREACH)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		if (code < 0 || code > NR_ICMP_UNREACH ||
+		    code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) /* needs a valid next-hop MTU */
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (!nskb)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		memset(IPCB(nskb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(nskb)));
+		icmp_send(nskb, type, code, 0);
+		consume_skb(nskb);
+		break;
+	}
+#endif
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
+		if (type != ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		if (code < 0 || code > ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (!nskb)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		memset(IP6CB(nskb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(nskb)));
+		icmpv6_send(nskb, type, code, 0);
+		consume_skb(nskb);
+		break;
+#endif
+	default:
+		return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();

 int bpf_dynptr_from_skb_rdonly(struct __sk_buff *skb, u64 flags,
@@ -12590,6 +12670,10 @@ BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_ops)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp)
 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_ops)

+BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_icmp_send)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_icmp_send)
+BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_icmp_send)
+
 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_skb = {
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 	.set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb,
@@ -12620,6 +12704,11 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_sock_ops = {
 	.set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_ops,
 };

+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_icmp_send = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_icmp_send,
+};
+
 static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -12641,6 +12730,7 @@ static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
 	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
 					       &bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr);
 	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, &bpf_kfunc_set_icmp_send);
 	return ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS, &bpf_kfunc_set_sock_ops);
 }
 late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);
--
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 1/5] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 07/09, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> This is needed in the context of Tetragon to provide improved feedback
> (in contrast to just dropping packets) to east-west traffic when blocked
> by policies using cgroup_skb programs.
> 
> This reuses concepts from netfilter reject target codepath with the
> differences that:
> * Packets are cloned since the BPF user can still let the packet pass
>   (SK_PASS from the cgroup_skb progs for example) and the current skb
>   need to stay untouched (cgroup_skb hooks only allow read-only skb
>   payload).
> * We protect against recursion since the kfunc, by generating an ICMP
>   error message, could retrigger the BPF prog that invoked it.
> 
> Only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH and ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH are currently supported.
> The interface accepts a type parameter to facilitate future extension to
> other ICMP control message types.
> 
> For normal cgroup_skb paths, the skb dst route should already be set.
> However, bpf_prog_test_run_skb can create synthetic IPv4/IPv6 skbs
> without an attached route. In that case, icmp_send returns early, and
> the kfunc would otherwise report success despite no ICMP reply being
> sent. This check also reject metadata dsts, which are not valid struct
> rtable instances. While IPv6 would stricly require only rejecting
> metadata dsts, same check is applied for API consistency.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/core/filter.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 4f5cbcac3e78..e4697036c67b 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@
>  #include <linux/un.h>
>  #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
>  #include <net/inet_dscp.h>
> +#include <linux/icmpv6.h>
> +#include <net/icmp.h>
> +#include <net/ip6_route.h>
> 
>  #include "dev.h"
> 
> @@ -12548,6 +12551,83 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_xdp_pull_data(struct xdp_md *x, u32 len)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * bpf_icmp_send - Send an ICMP control message
> + * @skb_ctx: Packet that triggered the control message
> + * @type: ICMP type (only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH/ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH supported)
> + * @code: ICMP code (0-15 except ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED for IPv4, 0-6 for IPv6)
> + *
> + * Sends an ICMP control message in response to the packet. The original packet
> + * is cloned before sending the ICMP message, so the BPF program can still let
> + * the packet pass if desired.
> + *
> + * Currently only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH (IPv4) and ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH (IPv6) are
> + * supported.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success (send attempt), negative error code on failure:
> + *         -EBUSY: Recursion detected
> + *         -EPROTONOSUPPORT: Non-IP protocol
> + *         -EOPNOTSUPP: Unsupported ICMP type
> + *         -EINVAL: Invalid code parameter
> + *         -ENETUNREACH: No usable route/dst for the ICMP reply
> + *         -ENOMEM: Memory allocation failed
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_icmp_send(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx, int type, int code)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
> +	struct sk_buff *nskb;
> +	struct sock *sk;
> +
> +	sk = skb_to_full_sk(skb);
> +	if (sk && sk->sk_kern_sock &&
> +	    (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP || sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_ICMPV6))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	if (!skb_valid_dst(skb))
> +		return -ENETUNREACH;

This looks much better, thanks!

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

[PATCH bpf-next v11 2/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb tests

[Mahe Tardy]

This test opens a server and client, enters a new cgroup, attach a
cgroup_skb program on egress and calls the bpf_icmp_send function from
the client egress so that an ICMP unreach control message is sent back
to the client. It then fetches the message from the error queue to
confirm the correct ICMP unreach code has been sent.

Note that, for the client, we have to connect in non-blocking mode to
let the test execute faster. Otherwise, we need to wait for the TCP
three-way handshake to timeout in the kernel before reading the errno.

Also note that we don't set IP_RECVERR on the socket in
connect_to_fd_nonblock since the error will be transferred anyway in our
test because the connection is rejected at the beginning of the TCP
handshake. See in net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:tcp_v4_err for more details.

Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c          | 164 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c |  38 ++++
 2 files changed, 202 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b8a98c90053e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include <linux/errqueue.h>
+#include <poll.h>
+#include "icmp_send.skel.h"
+
+#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
+
+#define ICMP_DEST_UNREACH 3
+
+#define ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED 4
+#define NR_ICMP_UNREACH 15
+
+#define KFUNC_RET_UNSET -1
+
+static int connect_to_fd_nonblock(int server_fd)
+{
+	struct sockaddr_storage addr;
+	socklen_t len = sizeof(addr);
+	int fd, err;
+
+	if (getsockname(server_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &len))
+		return -1;
+
+	fd = socket(addr.ss_family, SOCK_STREAM | SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	err = connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, len);
+	if (err < 0 && errno != EINPROGRESS) {
+		close(fd);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	return fd;
+}
+
+static void read_icmp_errqueue(int sockfd, int expected_code)
+{
+	struct sock_extended_err *sock_err;
+	char ctrl_buf[512];
+	struct msghdr msg = {
+		.msg_control = ctrl_buf,
+		.msg_controllen = sizeof(ctrl_buf),
+	};
+	struct pollfd pfd = {
+		.fd = sockfd,
+		.events = POLLERR,
+	};
+	struct cmsghdr *cm;
+	ssize_t n;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(poll(&pfd, 1, TIMEOUT_MS), 1, "poll_errqueue"))
+		return;
+
+	n = recvmsg(sockfd, &msg, MSG_ERRQUEUE);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(n, 0, "recvmsg_errqueue"))
+		return;
+
+	cm = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
+	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(cm, NULL, "cm_firsthdr_null"))
+		return;
+
+	for (; cm; cm = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cm)) {
+		if (cm->cmsg_level != IPPROTO_IP || cm->cmsg_type != IP_RECVERR)
+			continue;
+
+		sock_err = (struct sock_extended_err *)CMSG_DATA(cm);
+
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_origin, SO_EE_ORIGIN_ICMP,
+			       "sock_err_origin_icmp"))
+			return;
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_type, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH,
+			       "sock_err_type_dest_unreach"))
+			return;
+		ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_code, expected_code, "sock_err_code");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	ASSERT_FAIL("no IP_RECVERR control message found");
+}
+
+static bool valid_unreach_code(int code)
+{
+	if (code < 0)
+		return false;
+
+	return code <= NR_ICMP_UNREACH && code != ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED;
+}
+
+static void trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(struct icmp_send *skel, int code)
+{
+	int srv_fd = -1, client_fd = -1;
+	int port;
+
+	srv_fd = start_server(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, "127.0.0.1", 0, TIMEOUT_MS);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(srv_fd, "start_server"))
+		return;
+
+	port = get_socket_local_port(srv_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(port, 0, "get_socket_local_port")) {
+		close(srv_fd);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	skel->bss->server_port = ntohs(port);
+	skel->bss->unreach_code = code;
+	skel->data->kfunc_ret = KFUNC_RET_UNSET;
+
+	client_fd = connect_to_fd_nonblock(srv_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(client_fd, "client_connect_nonblock")) {
+		close(srv_fd);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (valid_unreach_code(code))
+		read_icmp_errqueue(client_fd, code);
+
+	close(client_fd);
+	close(srv_fd);
+}
+
+void test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup(void)
+{
+	struct icmp_send *skel;
+	int cgroup_fd = -1;
+
+	skel = icmp_send__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/icmp_send_unreach_cgroup");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "join_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->links.egress =
+		bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.egress, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.egress, "prog_attach_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	for (int code = 0; code <= NR_ICMP_UNREACH; code++) {
+		if (code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED)
+			continue;
+
+		trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, code);
+		ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, 0, "kfunc_ret");
+	}
+
+	/* Test invalid codes */
+	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, -1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+
+	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, NR_ICMP_UNREACH + 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+
+	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED);
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+
+cleanup:
+	icmp_send__destroy(skel);
+	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
+		close(cgroup_fd);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6d0be0a9afe1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
+
+/* 127.0.0.1 in host byte order */
+#define SERVER_IP 0x7F000001
+
+#define ICMP_DEST_UNREACH 3
+
+__u16 server_port = 0;
+int unreach_code = 0;
+int kfunc_ret = -1;
+
+SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
+int egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
+	void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
+	struct iphdr *iph;
+	struct tcphdr *tcph;
+
+	iph = data;
+	if ((void *)(iph + 1) > data_end || iph->version != 4 ||
+	    iph->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP || iph->daddr != bpf_htonl(SERVER_IP))
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	tcph = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
+	if ((void *)(tcph + 1) > data_end ||
+	    tcph->dest != bpf_htons(server_port))
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	kfunc_ret = bpf_icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, unreach_code);
+
+	return SK_DROP;
+}
+
+char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "Dual BSD/GPL";
--
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 2/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb tests

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 07/09, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> This test opens a server and client, enters a new cgroup, attach a
> cgroup_skb program on egress and calls the bpf_icmp_send function from
> the client egress so that an ICMP unreach control message is sent back
> to the client. It then fetches the message from the error queue to
> confirm the correct ICMP unreach code has been sent.
> 
> Note that, for the client, we have to connect in non-blocking mode to
> let the test execute faster. Otherwise, we need to wait for the TCP
> three-way handshake to timeout in the kernel before reading the errno.
> 
> Also note that we don't set IP_RECVERR on the socket in
> connect_to_fd_nonblock since the error will be transferred anyway in our
> test because the connection is rejected at the beginning of the TCP
> handshake. See in net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:tcp_v4_err for more details.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

[PATCH bpf-next v11 3/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb IPv6 tests

[Mahe Tardy]

This test extends the existing cgroup_skb tests with IPv6 support.

Note that we need to set IPV6_RECVERR on the socket for IPv6 in
connect_to_fd_nonblock otherwise the error will be ignored even if we
are in the middle of the TCP handshake. See in
net/ipv6/datagram.c:ipv6_icmp_error for more details.

Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c          | 91 +++++++++++++------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c | 48 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
index b8a98c90053e..bbb3c3d4509c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
@@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
 #define TIMEOUT_MS 1000

 #define ICMP_DEST_UNREACH 3
+#define ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH 1

 #define ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED 4
 #define NR_ICMP_UNREACH 15
+#define ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE 6

 #define KFUNC_RET_UNSET -1

@@ -18,7 +20,7 @@ static int connect_to_fd_nonblock(int server_fd)
 {
 	struct sockaddr_storage addr;
 	socklen_t len = sizeof(addr);
-	int fd, err;
+	int fd, err, on = 1;

 	if (getsockname(server_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &len))
 		return -1;
@@ -27,6 +29,12 @@ static int connect_to_fd_nonblock(int server_fd)
 	if (fd < 0)
 		return -1;

+	if (addr.ss_family == AF_INET6 &&
+	    setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_RECVERR, &on, sizeof(on)) < 0) {
+		close(fd);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	err = connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, len);
 	if (err < 0 && errno != EINPROGRESS) {
 		close(fd);
@@ -36,8 +44,14 @@ static int connect_to_fd_nonblock(int server_fd)
 	return fd;
 }

-static void read_icmp_errqueue(int sockfd, int expected_code)
+static void read_icmp_errqueue(int sockfd, int expected_code, int af)
 {
+	int expected_ee_type = (af == AF_INET) ? ICMP_DEST_UNREACH :
+						 ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH;
+	int expected_origin = (af == AF_INET) ? SO_EE_ORIGIN_ICMP :
+						SO_EE_ORIGIN_ICMP6;
+	int expected_level = (af == AF_INET) ? IPPROTO_IP : IPPROTO_IPV6;
+	int expected_type = (af == AF_INET) ? IP_RECVERR : IPV6_RECVERR;
 	struct sock_extended_err *sock_err;
 	char ctrl_buf[512];
 	struct msghdr msg = {
@@ -63,38 +77,43 @@ static void read_icmp_errqueue(int sockfd, int expected_code)
 		return;

 	for (; cm; cm = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cm)) {
-		if (cm->cmsg_level != IPPROTO_IP || cm->cmsg_type != IP_RECVERR)
+		if (cm->cmsg_level != expected_level ||
+		    cm->cmsg_type != expected_type)
 			continue;

 		sock_err = (struct sock_extended_err *)CMSG_DATA(cm);

-		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_origin, SO_EE_ORIGIN_ICMP,
-			       "sock_err_origin_icmp"))
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_origin, expected_origin,
+			       "sock_err_origin"))
 			return;
-		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_type, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH,
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_type, expected_ee_type,
 			       "sock_err_type_dest_unreach"))
 			return;
 		ASSERT_EQ(sock_err->ee_code, expected_code, "sock_err_code");
 		return;
 	}

-	ASSERT_FAIL("no IP_RECVERR control message found");
+	ASSERT_FAIL("no IP_RECVERR/IPV6_RECVERR control message found");
 }

-static bool valid_unreach_code(int code)
+static bool valid_unreach_code(int code, int af)
 {
 	if (code < 0)
 		return false;

-	return code <= NR_ICMP_UNREACH && code != ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED;
+	if (af == AF_INET)
+		return code <= NR_ICMP_UNREACH && code != ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED;
+
+	return code <= ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE;
 }

-static void trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(struct icmp_send *skel, int code)
+static void trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(struct icmp_send *skel, int code,
+					    int af, const char *ip)
 {
 	int srv_fd = -1, client_fd = -1;
 	int port;

-	srv_fd = start_server(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, "127.0.0.1", 0, TIMEOUT_MS);
+	srv_fd = start_server(af, SOCK_STREAM, ip, 0, TIMEOUT_MS);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(srv_fd, "start_server"))
 		return;

@@ -105,6 +124,8 @@ static void trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(struct icmp_send *skel, int code)
 	}

 	skel->bss->server_port = ntohs(port);
+	skel->bss->unreach_type = (af == AF_INET) ? ICMP_DEST_UNREACH :
+						    ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH;
 	skel->bss->unreach_code = code;
 	skel->data->kfunc_ret = KFUNC_RET_UNSET;

@@ -114,13 +135,37 @@ static void trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(struct icmp_send *skel, int code)
 		return;
 	}

-	if (valid_unreach_code(code))
-		read_icmp_errqueue(client_fd, code);
+	if (valid_unreach_code(code, af))
+		read_icmp_errqueue(client_fd, code, af);

 	close(client_fd);
 	close(srv_fd);
 }

+static void run_icmp_test(struct icmp_send *skel, int af, const char *ip,
+			  int max_code)
+{
+	for (int code = 0; code <= max_code; code++) {
+		if (af == AF_INET && code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED)
+			continue;
+
+		trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, code, af, ip);
+		ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, 0, "kfunc_ret");
+	}
+
+	/* Test invalid codes */
+	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, -1, af, ip);
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+
+	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, max_code + 1, af, ip);
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+
+	if (af == AF_INET) {
+		trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED, af, ip);
+		ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+	}
+}
+
 void test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup(void)
 {
 	struct icmp_send *skel;
@@ -139,23 +184,11 @@ void test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup(void)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.egress, "prog_attach_cgroup"))
 		goto cleanup;

-	for (int code = 0; code <= NR_ICMP_UNREACH; code++) {
-		if (code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED)
-			continue;
-
-		trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, code);
-		ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, 0, "kfunc_ret");
-	}
-
-	/* Test invalid codes */
-	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, -1);
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+	if (test__start_subtest("ipv4"))
+		run_icmp_test(skel, AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", NR_ICMP_UNREACH);

-	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, NR_ICMP_UNREACH + 1);
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
-
-	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED);
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -EINVAL, "kfunc_ret");
+	if (test__start_subtest("ipv6"))
+		run_icmp_test(skel, AF_INET6, "::1", ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE);

 cleanup:
 	icmp_send__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
index 6d0be0a9afe1..6e1ba539eeb0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@

 /* 127.0.0.1 in host byte order */
 #define SERVER_IP 0x7F000001
-
-#define ICMP_DEST_UNREACH 3
+/* ::1 in host byte order (last 32-bit word) */
+#define SERVER_IP6_LO 0x00000001

 __u16 server_port = 0;
+int unreach_type = 0;
 int unreach_code = 0;
 int kfunc_ret = -1;

@@ -18,19 +19,48 @@ int egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
 	void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
 	struct iphdr *iph;
+	struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
 	struct tcphdr *tcph;
+	__u8 version;

-	iph = data;
-	if ((void *)(iph + 1) > data_end || iph->version != 4 ||
-	    iph->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP || iph->daddr != bpf_htonl(SERVER_IP))
+	if (data + 1 > data_end)
 		return SK_PASS;

-	tcph = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
-	if ((void *)(tcph + 1) > data_end ||
-	    tcph->dest != bpf_htons(server_port))
+	version = (*((__u8 *)data)) >> 4;
+
+	if (version == 4) {
+		iph = data;
+		if ((void *)(iph + 1) > data_end ||
+		    iph->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP ||
+		    iph->daddr != bpf_htonl(SERVER_IP))
+			return SK_PASS;
+
+		tcph = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
+		if ((void *)(tcph + 1) > data_end ||
+		    tcph->dest != bpf_htons(server_port))
+			return SK_PASS;
+
+	} else if (version == 6) {
+		ip6h = data;
+		if ((void *)(ip6h + 1) > data_end ||
+		    ip6h->nexthdr != IPPROTO_TCP)
+			return SK_PASS;
+
+		if (ip6h->daddr.in6_u.u6_addr32[0] != 0 ||
+		    ip6h->daddr.in6_u.u6_addr32[1] != 0 ||
+		    ip6h->daddr.in6_u.u6_addr32[2] != 0 ||
+		    ip6h->daddr.in6_u.u6_addr32[3] != bpf_htonl(SERVER_IP6_LO))
+			return SK_PASS;
+
+		tcph = (void *)(ip6h + 1);
+		if ((void *)(tcph + 1) > data_end ||
+		    tcph->dest != bpf_htons(server_port))
+			return SK_PASS;
+	} else {
 		return SK_PASS;
+	}

-	kfunc_ret = bpf_icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, unreach_code);
+	kfunc_ret = bpf_icmp_send(skb, unreach_type, unreach_code);

 	return SK_DROP;
 }
--
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 3/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb IPv6 tests

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 07/09, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> This test extends the existing cgroup_skb tests with IPv6 support.
> 
> Note that we need to set IPV6_RECVERR on the socket for IPv6 in
> connect_to_fd_nonblock otherwise the error will be ignored even if we
> are in the middle of the TCP handshake. See in
> net/ipv6/datagram.c:ipv6_icmp_error for more details.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

[PATCH bpf-next v11 4/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test

[Mahe Tardy]

This test is similar to test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup but checks that,
in case of recursion, meaning that the BPF program calling the kfunc was
re-triggered by the icmp_send done by the kfunc, the kfunc will stop
early and return -EBUSY.

The test attaches to the root cgroup to ensure the ICMP packet generated
by the kfunc re-triggers the BPF program.

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c          | 46 ++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
index bbb3c3d4509c..bb532aa0d158 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <network_helpers.h>
+#include <cgroup_helpers.h>
 #include <linux/errqueue.h>
 #include <poll.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
 #include "icmp_send.skel.h"

 #define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
@@ -10,6 +12,7 @@
 #define ICMP_DEST_UNREACH 3
 #define ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH 1

+#define ICMP_HOST_UNREACH 1
 #define ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED 4
 #define NR_ICMP_UNREACH 15
 #define ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE 6
@@ -195,3 +198,46 @@ void test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup(void)
 	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
 		close(cgroup_fd);
 }
+
+void test_icmp_send_unreach_recursion(void)
+{
+	struct icmp_send *skel;
+	int cgroup_fd = -1;
+	int err;
+
+	err = setup_cgroup_environment();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setup_cgroup_environment"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = icmp_send__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	cgroup_fd = get_root_cgroup();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "get_root_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->data->target_pid = getpid();
+	skel->links.recursion =
+		bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.recursion, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.recursion, "prog_attach_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, ICMP_HOST_UNREACH, AF_INET,
+					"127.0.0.1");
+
+	/*
+	 * Because there's recursion involved, the first call will return at
+	 * index 1 since it will return the second, and the second call will
+	 * return at index 0 since it will return the first.
+	 */
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->rec_count, 2, "rec_count");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->rec_kfunc_rets[0], -EBUSY, "kfunc_rets[0]");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->rec_kfunc_rets[1], 0, "kfunc_rets[1]");
+
+cleanup:
+	icmp_send__destroy(skel);
+	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
+		close(cgroup_fd);
+	cleanup_cgroup_environment();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
index 6e1ba539eeb0..c642ccdf9fd5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ __u16 server_port = 0;
 int unreach_type = 0;
 int unreach_code = 0;
 int kfunc_ret = -1;
+int target_pid = -1;
+
+unsigned int rec_count = 0;
+int rec_kfunc_rets[] = { -1, -1 };

 SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
 int egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
@@ -65,4 +69,55 @@ int egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	return SK_DROP;
 }

+SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
+int recursion(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
+	void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
+	struct icmphdr *icmph;
+	struct tcphdr *tcph;
+	struct iphdr *iph;
+	int ret;
+
+	if ((bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32) != target_pid)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	iph = data;
+	if ((void *)(iph + 1) > data_end || iph->version != 4)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	if (iph->daddr != bpf_htonl(SERVER_IP))
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP) {
+		tcph = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
+		if ((void *)(tcph + 1) > data_end ||
+		    tcph->dest != bpf_htons(server_port))
+			return SK_PASS;
+	} else if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) {
+		icmph = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
+		if ((void *)(icmph + 1) > data_end ||
+		    icmph->type != unreach_type || icmph->code != unreach_code)
+			return SK_PASS;
+	} else {
+		return SK_PASS;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * This call will provoke a recursion: the ICMP packet generated by the
+	 * kfunc will re-trigger this program since we are in the root cgroup in
+	 * which the kernel ICMP socket belongs. However when re-entering the
+	 * kfunc, it should return EBUSY.
+	 */
+	ret = bpf_icmp_send(skb, unreach_type, unreach_code);
+	rec_kfunc_rets[rec_count & 1] = ret;
+	__sync_fetch_and_add(&rec_count, 1);
+
+	/* Let the first ICMP error message pass */
+	if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	return SK_DROP;
+}
+
 char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "Dual BSD/GPL";
--
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 4/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 07/09, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> This test is similar to test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup but checks that,
> in case of recursion, meaning that the BPF program calling the kfunc was
> re-triggered by the icmp_send done by the kfunc, the kfunc will stop
> early and return -EBUSY.
> 
> The test attaches to the root cgroup to ensure the ICMP packet generated
> by the kfunc re-triggers the BPF program.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

[PATCH bpf-next v11 5/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send no route test

[Mahe Tardy]

For normal live cgroup_skb paths, the skb should already be routed. The
exception is for test run via BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with packets created
via bpf_prog_test_run_skb. Those lack dst route and thus the icmp_send
would quietly fail by returning early.

This test exercises this and makes sure the kfunc returns -ENETUNREACH.

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c          | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
index bb532aa0d158..9318d4bc7ce8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
@@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ static void run_icmp_test(struct icmp_send *skel, int af, const char *ip,
 	}
 }

+static void run_icmp_no_route_test(struct icmp_send *skel, int af)
+{
+	union {
+		struct ipv4_packet v4;
+		struct ipv6_packet v6;
+	} pkt;
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
+		.data_in = &pkt,
+	);
+	int err;
+
+	switch (af) {
+	case AF_INET:
+		pkt.v4 = pkt_v4;
+		pkt.v4.iph.version = 4;
+		pkt.v4.iph.daddr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK);
+		pkt.v4.tcp.dest = htons(80);
+		opts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt.v4);
+		skel->bss->unreach_type = ICMP_DEST_UNREACH;
+		break;
+	case AF_INET6:
+		pkt.v6 = pkt_v6;
+		pkt.v6.iph.version = 6;
+		pkt.v6.iph.daddr = in6addr_loopback;
+		pkt.v6.tcp.dest = htons(80);
+		opts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt.v6);
+		skel->bss->unreach_type = ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH;
+		break;
+	default:
+		ASSERT_FAIL("af_not_supported");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	skel->bss->server_port = 80;
+	skel->data->kfunc_ret = KFUNC_RET_UNSET;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.egress), &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"))
+		return;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->kfunc_ret, -ENETUNREACH, "kfunc_ret_no_route");
+}
+
 void test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup(void)
 {
 	struct icmp_send *skel;
@@ -193,6 +236,12 @@ void test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup(void)
 	if (test__start_subtest("ipv6"))
 		run_icmp_test(skel, AF_INET6, "::1", ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE);

+	if (test__start_subtest("no_route_ipv4"))
+		run_icmp_no_route_test(skel, AF_INET);
+
+	if (test__start_subtest("no_route_ipv6"))
+		run_icmp_no_route_test(skel, AF_INET6);
+
 cleanup:
 	icmp_send__destroy(skel);
 	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
--
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 5/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send no route test

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 07/09, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> For normal live cgroup_skb paths, the skb should already be routed. The
> exception is for test run via BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with packets created
> via bpf_prog_test_run_skb. Those lack dst route and thus the icmp_send
> would quietly fail by returning early.
> 
> This test exercises this and makes sure the kfunc returns -ENETUNREACH.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 0/5] bpf: add icmp_send kfunc

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Thu,  9 Jul 2026 14:48:55 +0000 you wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This is v11 of adding the icmp_send kfunc, as suggested during
> LSF/MM/BPF 2025[^1]. The goal is to allow cgroup_skb programs to
> actively reject east-west traffic, similarly to what is possible to do
> with netfilter reject target. Applications can receive early feedback
> that something went wrong during the TCP handshake.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v11,1/5] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc
    (no matching commit)
  - [bpf-next,v11,2/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb tests
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/39b337a3d995
  - [bpf-next,v11,3/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb IPv6 tests
    (no matching commit)
  - [bpf-next,v11,4/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test
    (no matching commit)
  - [bpf-next,v11,5/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send no route test
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html