From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
<aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>, <advoretsky@gmail.com>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] igc: remove napi_synchronize() in igc_down()
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:42:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alSzCokS7scCoza7@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260712132242.223254-1-devnexen@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2026 at 02:22:42PM +0100, David Carlier wrote:
> When an AF_XDP zero-copy application is killed abruptly, the XSK pool is
> torn down but NAPI keeps polling. igc_clean_rx_irq_zc() then returns the
> full budget on every poll, so napi_complete_done() never clears
> NAPI_STATE_SCHED.
>
> igc_down() calls napi_synchronize() before napi_disable(), so it spins
> forever waiting for that bit and the interface never goes down. Drop the
> napi_synchronize() and let napi_disable() do the job -- it sets
> NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, which forces the stuck poll to complete. Reorder it
> ahead of igc_set_queue_napi() so the NAPI mapping is cleared only after
> polling has stopped, matching the recent igb fix b1e067240379.
>
> Fixes: fc9df2a0b520 ("igc: Enable RX via AF_XDP zero-copy")
> Suggested-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
This is a mirror of what Alex Dvoretsky did on igb, correct? Did you
reproduce the same issue on your side or is it a blind shot at this
driver?
Regardless, I think it's a correct thing to do, but some clarification
would be nice.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index 2c9e2dfd8499..b3883a5a7d7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -5352,9 +5352,8 @@ void igc_down(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
>
> for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_q_vectors; i++) {
> if (adapter->q_vector[i]) {
> - napi_synchronize(&adapter->q_vector[i]->napi);
> - igc_set_queue_napi(adapter, i, NULL);
> napi_disable(&adapter->q_vector[i]->napi);
> + igc_set_queue_napi(adapter, i, NULL);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-12 13:22 [PATCH net] igc: remove napi_synchronize() in igc_down() David Carlier
2026-07-13 9:42 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alSzCokS7scCoza7@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=advoretsky@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox