Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] Add support for driver cross-timestamp to PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 22:33:48 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1508222226540.3873@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440183128-1384-4-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com>

On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Christopher S. Hall wrote:
> From: Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
> 
> This patch allows system and device time ("cross-timestamp") to be
> performed by the driver. Currently, the cross-timestamping is performed
> in the PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl.  The PTP clock driver reads gettimeofday()
> and the gettime64() callback provided by the driver. The cross-timestamp
> is best effort where the latency between the capture of system time
> (getnstimeofday()) and the device time (driver callback) may be
> significant.
> 
> This patch adds an additional callback getsynctime64(). Which will be
> called when the driver is able to perform a more accurate, implementation
> specific cross-timestamping.  For example, future network devices that
> implement PCIE PTM will be able to precisely correlate the device clock
> with the system clock with virtually zero latency between captures.
> This added callback can be used by the driver to expose this functionality.
> 
> The callback, getsynctime64(), will only be called when defined and
> n_samples == 1 because the driver returns only 1 cross-timestamp where
> multiple samples cannot be chained together.
> 
> This patch also adds to the capabilities ioctl (PTP_CLOCK_GETCAPS),
> allowing applications to query whether or not drivers implement the
> getsynctime callback, providing more precise cross timestamping.

That looks close to a proper changelog. A few nitpicks though.

Please avoid 'This patch does ...' phrases. We already know that this
is a patch.


> Commit Details:

Please get rid of this. It's useless noise.
 
> Added additional callback to ptp_clock_info:
> 
> * getsynctime64()

> @@ -196,19 +197,31 @@ long ptp_ioctl(struct posix_clock *pc, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		pct = &sysoff->ts[0];
> -		for (i = 0; i < sysoff->n_samples; i++) {
> -			getnstimeofday64(&ts);
> +		if (ptp->info->getsynctime64 && sysoff->n_samples == 1 &&

The number of samples should be irrelevant for this sampling method.

> +		    ptp->info->getsynctime64(ptp->info, &ts, &systs) == 0) {

Why is this function taking struct timespec64 pointers? Just so every
driver which implements the callback needs to convert from u64 to
struct timespec64? That's simply wrong. Use u64 for both and do the
conversion in the ioctl.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-22 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-21 18:52 [PATCH v3 0/4] Patchset enabling hardware based cross-timestamps for next gen Intel platforms Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Add correlated clocksource deriving system time from an auxiliary clocksource Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-03 23:20     ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-09-04  8:11       ` Richard Cochran
2015-09-04 14:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-04 21:12           ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-09-04 13:02       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-04 15:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-04 15:17           ` Richard Cochran
2015-09-04 15:41             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-04 16:35               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-04 21:01                 ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-09-05  8:46                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-05 10:04                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-04 15:32         ` Richard Cochran
2015-09-04 21:50       ` John Stultz
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Added ART correlated clocksource and ART CPU feature Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:26   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Add support for driver cross-timestamp to PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:33   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-08-22 21:17     ` Richard Cochran
2015-08-23  8:15       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-23 11:25         ` Richard Cochran
2015-08-24 20:16           ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-08-25  7:31             ` Richard Cochran
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Enabling hardware supported PTP system/device crosstimestamping Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:46   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1508222226540.3873@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox