public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.b.stanton@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:15:57 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510151014330.3960@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.x6iyd7gq1774gr@chall-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Christopher Hall wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:42:52 -0700, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Christopher S. Hall wrote:
> > > audio.
> > 
> > This wants to be a seperate patch, really.
> 
> OK. This makes sense, I'll do this the next time.
> 
> > > +/* This needs to be 3 or greater for backtracking to be useful */
> > 
> > Why?
> 
> The current index points to a copy and the next may be being changed by
> update_wall_time(). Leaving n-2 entries available with useful history in them.
> I'll add more descriptive comments here.
> 
> > 
> > > +#define SHADOW_HISTORY_DEPTH 7
> > 
> > And that number is 7 because?
> 
> Due to power of 2 it will be 8 instead. As above the useful history is 8-2*1
> ms (1 ms is the minimum jiffy length).  Array size 4 would not be enough
> history for the DSP which requires 4 ms of history, in the worst case.

And how exactly becomes 7 magically 8?
 
> > 
> > What's the point of this? Why are you not making the few lines which
> > you can actually reuse a helper function and leave the PTP code alone?
> 
> The audio driver is structured in such a way that it's simpler to provide a
> value rather than a callback.  I changed this to allow the audio developers to
> provide an ART value as input.  If a callback is provided, the resulting
> counter value is guaranteed to be later than cycle_last and there is no need
> to do extra checking (the goto skips that check).  Is this an answer to your
> question?

Make it a seperate function which can hand in the information and
leave the PTP specific sample/conversion function alone.

Thanks,

	tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-12 18:45 [PATCH v4 0/4] Patchset enabling hardware based cross-timestamps for next gen Intel platforms Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13  4:58   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13  7:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13  8:31       ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 19:15         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13 21:12           ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-14  7:21             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14  9:29               ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-14 14:22                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14 16:18                   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  2:34             ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-15  5:41               ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  8:13                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13  5:26   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 13:50   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 19:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-15  1:57     ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-15  5:57       ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  8:15       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-10-20  0:18         ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-20  0:36           ` John Stultz
2015-10-20  8:54             ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 10:48               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 11:51                 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 14:55                   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 19:11                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 19:36                       ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 20:16                       ` John Stultz
2015-10-21  7:44                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-03 19:18                           ` Stanton, Kevin B
2015-11-09 21:17                             ` John Stultz
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] Always running timer " Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13  2:03   ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-18 23:53   ` Jacob Pan
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Add PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE for driver crosstimestamping Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13 13:59   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  2:47     ` Christopher Hall
2015-11-07  2:15     ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] Adds hardware supported cross timestamp Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13  2:10   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-13  2:11   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-13  2:31   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1510151014330.3960@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kevin.b.stanton@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox