public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kevin.b.stanton@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:48:03 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510201246250.3982@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151020085408.GA2542@netboy>

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Richard Cochran wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:36:56PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > If we're only tracking 4ms of history, how does this solution
> > measurably improve the error over using the timestamps to generate
> > MONOTONIC_RAW clock deltas (which doesn't require keeping any history)
> > and using getnstime_raw_and_real to take an anchor point to calculate
> > the delta from?  Why is adding complexity necessary?
> 
> This idea is variant of what I suggested in another reply in this
> thread.  To my understanding, there is no need at all to keep a
> history arbitrarily 4 ms long.  Instead, the DSP driver (or whoever
> else may need such a thing) can simply sample the system time at the
> rate needed for that particular application.

That's complete nonsense. The whole point is to have a proper
correlation from ART/audio timestamps to system time. Sampling system
time does not help in any way,

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-20 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-12 18:45 [PATCH v4 0/4] Patchset enabling hardware based cross-timestamps for next gen Intel platforms Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13  4:58   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13  7:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13  8:31       ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 19:15         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13 21:12           ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-14  7:21             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14  9:29               ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-14 14:22                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14 16:18                   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  2:34             ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-15  5:41               ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  8:13                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13  5:26   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 13:50   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 19:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-15  1:57     ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-15  5:57       ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  8:15       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20  0:18         ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-20  0:36           ` John Stultz
2015-10-20  8:54             ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 10:48               ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-10-20 11:51                 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 14:55                   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 19:11                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 19:36                       ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 20:16                       ` John Stultz
2015-10-21  7:44                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-03 19:18                           ` Stanton, Kevin B
2015-11-09 21:17                             ` John Stultz
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] Always running timer " Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13  2:03   ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-18 23:53   ` Jacob Pan
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Add PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE for driver crosstimestamping Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13 13:59   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15  2:47     ` Christopher Hall
2015-11-07  2:15     ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] Adds hardware supported cross timestamp Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13  2:10   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-13  2:11   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-13  2:31   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1510201246250.3982@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kevin.b.stanton@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox