Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	 pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: opt loopback into instance locking
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:14:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arGd3auaaTerBqNb@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921190452.1467853-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On 09/21, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> netdev netlink iterates over devices when dumping queues/NAPIs/qstats
> etc. and takes rtnl_lock or instance lock depending on the underlying
> device. Currently even if all the "real" devices in the system are ops
> locked we still have to take rtnl_lock for lo (only to find out
> that it doesn't even have queues or NAPIs to report).
> Opt loopback into having control path under the ops lock.
> 
> This is a pretty obvious thing to do, I've held back this
> patch because we used to only apply ops locking on physical devices.
> netkit queue leasing made a precedent for (far more complex)
> SW devices enabling ops locking. Now adding it to lo should
> not create much new bug surface.
> 
> I considered an alternative of adding a "predicate" to the iteration
> primitive so that we can skip the devices which obviously don't
> support given API (eg qstat) without any locking. But it's more
> LoC and real_num_.x_queues is not currently WRITE_ONCE()ed so
> it doesn't work too well for queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
>  - move setting the request flag from gen_lo_setup() to loopback_setup()
>    to avoid splats on the blackhole dev which we don't care about

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

(mostly because dummy is also ops locked, don't think loopback should
bring any problems)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-21 19:04 [PATCH net-next v2] net: opt loopback into instance locking Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-21 21:14 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-09-22 18:15   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-22 19:21     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-22  7:11 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-24  2:40 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arGd3auaaTerBqNb@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
    --to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox