Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	 pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: opt loopback into instance locking
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:21:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arLSItTdl8TQTSCa@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922111507.6fae8770@kernel.org>

On 09/22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:14:19 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 09/21, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > >  - move setting the request flag from gen_lo_setup() to loopback_setup()
> > >    to avoid splats on the blackhole dev which we don't care about  
> > 
> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
> > 
> > (mostly because dummy is also ops locked, don't think loopback should
> > bring any problems)
> 
> Stan, the issue Matt reported in the BPF CI is a generic sw device +
> netdev lock issue. We are triggering it on lo because.. probability,
> but it reproduces with dummy + netkit already today.
> 
> Do you recall why we have separate classes for each device type?
> 
> Classes make the lock_set_cmp_fn() ineffective across different device
> types. Quick test removing the classes and sticking to just the cmp fn
> seems make lockdep happy, I'm running the ksft suite now. But maybe you
> can tell me if it's the right idea before it finishes..?

No, I don't think there is a reason we added both. It might have been
that we started with a class and then added cmp_fn on top. This whole
function is a 10+ years of whack-a-mole with lockdep :-( Agreed that
removing class (which prevents cmp_fn from working properly across
all instance locks) sounds sensible.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-21 19:04 [PATCH net-next v2] net: opt loopback into instance locking Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-21 21:14 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-22 18:15   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-22 19:21     ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-09-22  7:11 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-24  2:40 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arLSItTdl8TQTSCa@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
    --to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox