* [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] seg6: skip route refcounts in seg6local lookups
@ 2026-10-10 10:10 Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv4 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yuya Kusakabe @ 2026-10-10 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Mayer, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Yuya Kusakabe
seg6local looks up the nexthop of its IPv6 and IPv4 behaviors from the
RCU read-side section of the receive path, yet takes and drops a route
reference for every packet. Skip the reference, as ip6_route_input()
and ip_rcv_finish() do.
---
Changes in v2:
- Split the lookup into a noref primitive for the seg6local input
actions and a refcounted seg6_lookup_nexthop() wrapper, which the BPF
LWT helpers also call (Andrea Mayer, Sashiko).
- Rebase onto net-next and re-measure.
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20261005-seg6-lookup-noref-v1-0-092e84774e80@gmail.com
---
Yuya Kusakabe (2):
seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups
seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv4 lookups
net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 758fe10f83a655bed0f7b98fcfacdfc3556fb9a1
change-id: 20261004-seg6-lookup-noref-e016495b60ed
Best regards,
--
Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups
2026-10-10 10:10 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] seg6: skip route refcounts in seg6local lookups Yuya Kusakabe
@ 2026-10-10 10:10 ` Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-13 23:58 ` Andrea Mayer
2026-10-15 14:30 ` Gabriel Goller
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv4 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yuya Kusakabe @ 2026-10-10 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Mayer, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Yuya Kusakabe
ip6_route_input() attaches the input route to the skb without taking a
reference, relying on the RCU read-side section of the receive path.
The seg6local input actions run in that same section, either directly
from the seg6local input handler or from a netfilter okfn, yet
seg6_lookup_any_nexthop() takes and drops a route reference for every
packet.
Look the route up with RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF, as ip6_route_input()
does, for the input and table lookups of those actions. Keep
seg6_lookup_nexthop(), which the BPF LWT helpers also call, refcounted:
BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN runs them repeatedly on the same skb and may leave
the RCU read-side section between runs. Like ip6_route_output_flags(),
it now takes the reference on top of the noref lookup.
Throughput at 0.5% packet loss of 94-byte End packets (two-segment
SRH, no payload), spread by RSS on an ixgbe 82599ES across two 2.30 GHz
Xeon E5-2650 v3 with 10 cores each, offered by TRex and binary-searched
over 10 runs of 10 s, in Mpps:
queues cores before after
1 1 0.740 0.756 (+2.2%)
10 10 on the NIC's socket 6.404 6.950 (+8.5%)
16 10 + 6 on two sockets 6.550 10.124 (+54.6%)
With the default rules, fib6_rule_lookup() tries the local table
first, and the miss takes and drops a reference on ip6_null_entry,
one route shared by every CPU. At 16 queues that cache line bounces
between the sockets, and ip6_hold_safe() and dst_release() together
take about a third of the cycles.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
index 0c3d1be7f129..f23330278922 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
@@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static struct ipv6_sr_hdr *advance_nextseg(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
static int
-seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct in6_addr *nhaddr,
- u32 tbl_id, bool local_delivery, int oif)
+seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref(struct sk_buff *skb, struct in6_addr *nhaddr,
+ u32 tbl_id, bool local_delivery, int oif)
{
struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
struct ipv6hdr *hdr = ipv6_hdr(skb);
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct in6_addr *nhaddr,
fl6.flowi6_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH;
if (!tbl_id && !oif) {
+ flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF;
dst = ip6_route_input_lookup(net, skb->dev, &fl6, skb, flags);
} else if (tbl_id) {
struct fib6_table *table;
@@ -350,6 +351,7 @@ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct in6_addr *nhaddr,
if (!table)
goto out;
+ flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF;
rt = ip6_pol_route(net, table, oif, &fl6, skb, flags);
dst = &rt->dst;
} else {
@@ -363,7 +365,7 @@ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct in6_addr *nhaddr,
dev_flags |= IFF_LOOPBACK;
if (dst && (dst_dev(dst)->flags & dev_flags) && !dst->error) {
- dst_release(dst);
+ ip6_rt_put_flags(dst_rt6_info(dst), flags);
dst = NULL;
}
@@ -372,17 +374,41 @@ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct in6_addr *nhaddr,
rt = net->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry;
dst = &rt->dst;
dst_hold(dst);
+ flags &= ~RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF;
}
skb_dst_drop(skb);
- skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
+ if ((flags & RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF) && !dst->rt_uncached_list)
+ skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst);
+ else
+ skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
return dst->error;
}
+static int seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct in6_addr *nhaddr, u32 tbl_id)
+{
+ return seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id, false, 0);
+}
+
int seg6_lookup_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct in6_addr *nhaddr, u32 tbl_id)
{
- return seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id, false, 0);
+ int err;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ err = seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id);
+ if (!skb_dst_force(skb)) {
+ struct dst_entry *dst;
+
+ dst = &dev_net(skb->dev)->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry->dst;
+ dst_hold(dst);
+ skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
+ err = dst->error;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return err;
}
static __u8 seg6_flv_lcblock_octects(const struct seg6_flavors_info *finfo)
@@ -446,7 +472,7 @@ seg6_next_csid_advance_arg(struct sk_buff *skb,
static int input_action_end_finish(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
{
- seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, 0);
+ seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, NULL, 0);
return dst_input(skb);
}
@@ -497,7 +523,7 @@ static int end_next_csid_core(struct sk_buff *skb, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
static int input_action_end_x_finish(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
{
- seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(skb, &slwt->nh6, 0, false, slwt->oif);
+ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref(skb, &slwt->nh6, 0, false, slwt->oif);
return dst_input(skb);
}
@@ -939,7 +965,7 @@ static int input_action_end_t(struct sk_buff *skb, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
goto drop;
}
- seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, slwt->table);
+ seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, NULL, slwt->table);
return dst_input(skb);
@@ -1023,7 +1049,7 @@ static int input_action_end_dx6_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
if (!ipv6_addr_any(&slwt->nh6))
nhaddr = &slwt->nh6;
- seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, nhaddr, 0);
+ seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, nhaddr, 0);
return dst_input(skb);
}
@@ -1383,7 +1409,7 @@ static int input_action_end_dt6(struct sk_buff *skb,
/* note: this time we do not need to specify the table because the VRF
* takes care of selecting the correct table.
*/
- seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(skb, NULL, 0, true, 0);
+ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref(skb, NULL, 0, true, 0);
return dst_input(skb);
@@ -1391,7 +1417,7 @@ static int input_action_end_dt6(struct sk_buff *skb,
#endif
skb_set_transport_header(skb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
- seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(skb, NULL, slwt->table, true, 0);
+ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref(skb, NULL, slwt->table, true, 0);
return dst_input(skb);
@@ -1446,7 +1472,7 @@ static int input_action_end_b6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
skb_set_transport_header(skb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
- seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, 0);
+ seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, NULL, 0);
return dst_input(skb);
@@ -1482,7 +1508,7 @@ static int input_action_end_b6_encap(struct sk_buff *skb,
skb_set_transport_header(skb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
- seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, 0);
+ seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, NULL, 0);
return dst_input(skb);
@@ -1571,7 +1597,7 @@ static int input_action_end_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb,
local_unlock_nested_bh(&seg6_bpf_srh_states.bh_lock);
if (ret != BPF_REDIRECT)
- seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, 0);
+ seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, NULL, 0);
return dst_input(skb);
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv4 lookups
2026-10-10 10:10 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] seg6: skip route refcounts in seg6local lookups Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
@ 2026-10-10 10:10 ` Yuya Kusakabe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yuya Kusakabe @ 2026-10-10 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Mayer, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Yuya Kusakabe
ip_route_input() looks the input route up with ip_route_input_noref()
and then forces a reference on it, which is dropped again when the
packet is transmitted. End.DX4 and End.DT4 call it from the RCU
read-side section of the receive path, either directly from the
seg6local input handler or from a netfilter okfn, and hand the skb to
dst_input() before leaving that section.
Use ip_route_input_noref(), as ip_rcv_finish() does.
Throughput at 0.5% packet loss of 82-byte IPv4-in-IPv6 UDP packets
(no SRH), spread by RSS on an ixgbe 82599ES across two 10-core Xeon
E5-2650 v3, offered by TRex over 10 runs of 10 s, in Mpps:
End.DX4
queues cores before after
1 1 0.791 0.811 (+2.5%)
10 10 on the NIC's socket 6.118 7.394 (+20.9%)
16 10 + 6 on two sockets 3.305 10.205 (+208.8%)
End.DT4
queues cores before after
1 1 0.481 0.489 (+1.6%)
10 10 on the NIC's socket 4.328 4.588 (+6.0%)
16 10 + 6 on two sockets 3.351 7.153 (+113.5%)
Every CPU takes and drops a reference on the same input route, the
one cached on the nexthop. At 16 queues that cache line bounces
between the sockets, and skb_dst_force() and dst_release() together
take more than half of the cycles for End.DX4 and over 40% for End.DT4.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
index f23330278922..60abd139dbe3 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static int input_action_end_dx4_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
skb_dst_drop(skb);
- reason = ip_route_input(skb, nhaddr, iph->saddr, 0, skb->dev);
+ reason = ip_route_input_noref(skb, nhaddr, iph->saddr, 0, skb->dev);
if (reason) {
kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ static int input_action_end_dt4(struct sk_buff *skb,
iph = ip_hdr(skb);
- reason = ip_route_input(skb, iph->daddr, iph->saddr, 0, skb->dev);
+ reason = ip_route_input_noref(skb, iph->daddr, iph->saddr, 0, skb->dev);
if (unlikely(reason))
goto drop;
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
@ 2026-10-13 23:58 ` Andrea Mayer
2026-10-15 14:31 ` Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-15 14:30 ` Gabriel Goller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Mayer @ 2026-10-13 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuya Kusakabe
Cc: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netdev, linux-kernel, Andrea Mayer
On Sat, 10 Oct 2026 19:10:39 +0900
Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Yuya,
Thanks for v2. I re-ran the BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN case from v1 on 32-bit ARM
with the changes of v2, and I could not reproduce the use-after-free
anymore.
> ip6_route_input() attaches the input route to the skb without taking a
> reference, relying on the RCU read-side section of the receive path.
> The seg6local input actions run in that same section, either directly
> from the seg6local input handler or from a netfilter okfn, yet
> seg6_lookup_any_nexthop() takes and drops a route reference for every
> packet.
For a packet queued with NFQUEUE, the okfn runs later from nf_reinject(),
under the rcu_read_lock() of the nfnetlink verdict handler. Is "that same
section" accurate for that case?
> [snip]
> if (!tbl_id && !oif) {
> + flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF;
> dst = ip6_route_input_lookup(net, skb->dev, &fl6, skb, flags);
> [snip]
> + flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF;
> rt = ip6_pol_route(net, table, oif, &fl6, skb, flags);
With RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF, ip6_pol_route() no longer calls
ip6_hold_safe(). If the route it finds is released on another CPU during
the lookup, the packet can be dropped without an ICMP error. Before the
series, when ip6_hold_safe() did not get the reference on the released
route, the packet went to the next policy rule, or to ip6_null_entry and
its ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable. As far as I can see, only packets that
race with the release are affected. It is still a change in behavior, and
it would be worth at least mentioning it in the commit message.
> [snip]
> int seg6_lookup_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct in6_addr *nhaddr, u32 tbl_id)
> {
> - return seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id, false, 0);
> + int err;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + err = seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id);
> + if (!skb_dst_force(skb)) {
> + struct dst_entry *dst;
> +
> + dst = &dev_net(skb->dev)->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry->dst;
> + dst_hold(dst);
> + skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
> + err = dst->error;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return err;
> }
The split works, and the contract is now in the names. One detail is how
seg6_lookup_nexthop() takes its reference: after the noref lookup, with
skb_dst_force(). Because of this, the BPF LWT helpers are affected by this
race too. Before the series, when ip6_hold_safe() did not get the reference
on the released route, seg6_lookup_nexthop() returned 0 if a later policy
rule had a route, or -ENETUNREACH. Now it can return -EINVAL in both cases.
The Sashiko review points out the second one.
It would be good to keep seg6_lookup_nexthop() unchanged for the BPF
helpers, also while a route is being released. One idea, as a refinement of
the split, could be a common lookup function with a noref argument. For
example, seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref() would call it with noref set, and
seg6_lookup_nexthop() with noref clear, keeping the refcounted lookup it
had before the series. What do you think?
> [snip]
Ciao,
Andrea
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-13 23:58 ` Andrea Mayer
@ 2026-10-15 14:30 ` Gabriel Goller
2026-10-15 14:38 ` Yuya Kusakabe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Goller @ 2026-10-15 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuya Kusakabe
Cc: Andrea Mayer, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, netdev, linux-kernel
Hi Yuya,
> [snip]
> @@ -372,17 +374,41 @@ seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct in6_addr *nhaddr,
> rt = net->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry;
> dst = &rt->dst;
> dst_hold(dst);
> + flags &= ~RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF;
> }
>
> skb_dst_drop(skb);
> - skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
> + if ((flags & RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF) && !dst->rt_uncached_list)
> + skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst);
> + else
> + skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
> return dst->error;
> }
>
> +static int seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct in6_addr *nhaddr, u32 tbl_id)
> +{
> + return seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id, false, 0);
> +}
> +
> int seg6_lookup_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct in6_addr *nhaddr, u32 tbl_id)
> {
> - return seg6_lookup_any_nexthop(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id, false, 0);
> + int err;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + err = seg6_lookup_nexthop_noref(skb, nhaddr, tbl_id);
> + if (!skb_dst_force(skb)) {
> + struct dst_entry *dst;
> +
> + dst = &dev_net(skb->dev)->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry->dst;
I think we should use ip6_null_entry instead of ip6_blk_hole_entry here.
Previously this path (failure to acquire the dst ref) was reached through
ip6_pol_route() and ip6_hold_safe(), which uses ip6_null_entry and returns
-ENETUNREACH as an error.
After this patch, the error is triggered here and we use ip6_blk_hole_entry,
which returns -EINVAL.
What do you think?
> + dst_hold(dst);
> + skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
> + err = dst->error;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> static __u8 seg6_flv_lcblock_octects(const struct seg6_flavors_info *finfo)
> [snip]
Thanks,
Gabriel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups
2026-10-13 23:58 ` Andrea Mayer
@ 2026-10-15 14:31 ` Yuya Kusakabe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yuya Kusakabe @ 2026-10-15 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Mayer
Cc: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netdev, linux-kernel
On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:58:19 +0200
Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it> wrote:
> For a packet queued with NFQUEUE, the okfn runs later from nf_reinject(),
> under the rcu_read_lock() of the nfnetlink verdict handler. Is "that same
> section" accurate for that case?
No, it is not. The lookup and dst_input() still run within one RCU
read-side section, but for a reinjected packet it is the one of the
verdict handler. v3 will say so in both patches.
> With RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF, ip6_pol_route() no longer calls
> ip6_hold_safe(). If the route it finds is released on another CPU during
> the lookup, the packet can be dropped without an ICMP error. Before the
> series, when ip6_hold_safe() did not get the reference on the released
> route, the packet went to the next policy rule, or to ip6_null_entry and
> its ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable. As far as I can see, only packets that
> race with the release are affected. It is still a change in behavior, and
> it would be worth at least mentioning it in the commit message.
Agreed. v3 will mention it in the 1/2 message, along with the fact
that ip6_route_input() has the same window.
> It would be good to keep seg6_lookup_nexthop() unchanged for the BPF
> helpers, also while a route is being released. One idea, as a refinement of
> the split, could be a common lookup function with a noref argument. For
> example, seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref() would call it with noref set, and
> seg6_lookup_nexthop() with noref clear, keeping the refcounted lookup it
> had before the series. What do you think?
That works better. In v3, seg6_lookup_any_nexthop() will take a noref
argument, seg6_lookup_any_nexthop_noref() will set it for the seg6local
input actions, and seg6_lookup_nexthop() will keep its refcounted
lookup. The skb_dst_force() fallback goes away, and with it the
-EINVAL that Sashiko pointed out.
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups
2026-10-15 14:30 ` Gabriel Goller
@ 2026-10-15 14:38 ` Yuya Kusakabe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yuya Kusakabe @ 2026-10-15 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel Goller
Cc: Andrea Mayer, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, netdev, linux-kernel
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:30:02 +0200
Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com> wrote:
> I think we should use ip6_null_entry instead of ip6_blk_hole_entry here.
> Previously this path (failure to acquire the dst ref) was reached through
> ip6_pol_route() and ip6_hold_safe(), which uses ip6_null_entry and returns
> -ENETUNREACH as an error.
> After this patch, the error is triggered here and we use ip6_blk_hole_entry,
> which returns -EINVAL.
>
> What do you think?
Agreed, the error changes. v3 will drop this fallback altogether:
following Andrea's suggestion, seg6_lookup_nexthop() will keep its
refcounted lookup, so ip6_hold_safe() handles the failure as before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-15 14:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-10 10:10 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] seg6: skip route refcounts in seg6local lookups Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv6 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-13 23:58 ` Andrea Mayer
2026-10-15 14:31 ` Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-15 14:30 ` Gabriel Goller
2026-10-15 14:38 ` Yuya Kusakabe
2026-10-10 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] seg6: skip the route refcount in seg6local IPv4 lookups Yuya Kusakabe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox