From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
tushar.vyavahare@intel.com, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
bjorn@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: move the AF_XDP test suite from bpf to net
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 08:52:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avH47_V-WbLm35cN@devvm16445.scu0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avHAGLwtyucllh/M@boxer>
On 11/09, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 12:43:36PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 11/05, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As the maintainers asked, this series is the first step of moving the
> > > AF_XDP selftests from selftests/bpf to selftests/net: the code moves and
> > > builds from its new location, without changing what the tests do. The
> > > rework [0] posted as "selftests: net: migrate AF_XDP test suite over to
> > > net" (v4) will follow on top of this move.
> > >
> > > Patch 1 drops the test_progs wrapper of the AF_XDP tests, patch 2 adds a
> > > generic BPF skeleton rule to net/bpf.mk, patch 3 moves xskxceiver, its
> > > library and test_xsk.sh to selftests/net, and patch 4 (new, not covered
> > > at [0]) moves xdp_hw_metadata, which is built from the same library.
> > >
> > > The xdp_metadata test stays in test_progs: it covers BPF core
> > > behaviour, and moving it would mean rewriting it for the kselftest
> > > harness. It keeps using xsk.c from net/lib/xsk.
> > >
> > > xskxceiver and xdp_hw_metadata are the first users of bpftool at build
> > > time in selftests/net. NIPA has bpftool, but 0-day and KernelCI build
> > > net without it, so both tools are skipped with a warning when bpftool
> > > is missing or does not run.
> > >
> > > test_xsk.sh is installed but not run by run_tests, so NIPA does not pick
> > > it up: it runs every case, including flaky ones, and some cases leak
> > > page_pool pages after skb_pp_cow_data() in generic XDP mode on
> > > veth-based runs. Until a later step makes the suite fit for NIPA, no CI
> > > runs the AF_XDP tests. test_xsk.sh is being removed by [0] but it is
> > > kept here as there is no other feasible way to run the test suite (if
> > > needed) until we come up with an upstreamable Python runner.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Maciej
> > >
> > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20261016174338.787135-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com/
> > >
> > > Maciej Fijalkowski (4):
> > > selftests/bpf: drop the test_progs AF_XDP wrapper
> > > selftests: net: add a generic rule for BPF skeletons
> > > selftests: xsk: move the AF_XDP test suite to selftests/net
> > > selftests: net: move xdp_hw_metadata from selftests/bpf
> >
> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
>
> Thanks for acking! However for some reason clashiko missed this set, can
> someone remind me what could be the case here?
>
> I also see in SUIE that check_selftest failed - is it mandatory to repost
> in this case?
```
Bad format: tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
```
Not super descriptive :-(
Maybe check on your side if this is complaining about something legit?
https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/blob/main/tests/patch/check_selftest/validate_makefile_format.py
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 13:41 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: move the AF_XDP test suite from bpf to net Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-05 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: drop the test_progs AF_XDP wrapper Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-05 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: net: add a generic rule for BPF skeletons Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-05 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: xsk: move the AF_XDP test suite to selftests/net Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-05 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: net: move xdp_hw_metadata from selftests/bpf Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-05 20:43 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: move the AF_XDP test suite from bpf to net Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 12:44 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-09 16:52 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-11-09 19:12 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avH47_V-WbLm35cN@devvm16445.scu0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox