Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	<hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <qinteng@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:06:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2a01486-9b4f-4bf0-91a6-b325e66b4883@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180312220132.GH4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>


Hi, Peter,

I have a question regarding to one of your comments below.

On 3/12/18 3:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 01:39:56PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>> +static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_map *map,
>> +					  struct stack_map_bucket *bucket,
>> +					  u64 *ips, u32 trace_nr)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> +	struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs;
>> +
>> +	bucket->nr = trace_nr;
>> +	id_offs = (struct bpf_stack_build_id *)bucket->data;
>> +
>> +	if (!current || !current->mm ||
>> +	    down_read_trylock(&current->mm->mmap_sem) == 0) {
> 
> You probably want an in_nmi() before the down_read_trylock(). Doing
> up_read() is an absolute no-no from NMI context.

The below is the final code from Song:

         /*
          * We cannot do up_read() in nmi context, so build_id lookup is
          * only supported for non-nmi events. If at some point, it is
          * possible to run find_vma() without taking the semaphore, we
          * would like to allow build_id lookup in nmi context.
          *
          * Same fallback is used for kernel stack (!user) on a stackmap
          * with build_id.
          */
         if (!user || !current || !current->mm || in_nmi() ||
             down_read_trylock(&current->mm->mmap_sem) == 0) {
                 /* cannot access current->mm, fall back to ips */
                 for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
                         id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
                         id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
                 }
                 return;
         }

         ....

> 
> And IIUC its 'trivial' to use this stuff with hardware counters.

Here, you mentioned that it was 'trivial' to use buildid thing with 
hardware counters, if I interpreted correctly. However, the hardware 
counter overflow will trigger NMI. Based on the above logic,
it will default to old IP only behavior.

Could you explain a little more how to get buildid with hardware
counter overflow events?

Thanks!

> 
>> +		/* cannot access current->mm, fall back to ips */
>> +		for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
>> +			id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
>> +			id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
>> +		}
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
>> +		vma = find_vma(current->mm, ips[i]);
>> +		if (!vma || stack_map_get_build_id(vma, id_offs[i].build_id)) {
>> +			/* per entry fall back to ips */
>> +			id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
>> +			id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>> +		id_offs[i].offset = (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + ips[i]
>> +			- vma->vm_start;
>> +		id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID;
>> +	}
>> +	up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>> +}
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-12 20:39 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf stackmap with build_id+offset Song Liu
2018-03-12 20:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address Song Liu
2018-03-12 21:00   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-03-12 21:12     ` Song Liu
2018-03-12 21:31       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-03-12 22:47         ` Song Liu
2018-03-13 21:31           ` Song Liu
2018-03-12 22:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-24  0:06     ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2018-03-13  9:53   ` [PATCH] bpf: fix semicolon.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2018-03-13  9:53   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address kbuild test robot
2018-03-12 20:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2a01486-9b4f-4bf0-91a6-b325e66b4883@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qinteng@fb.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox