From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <qinteng@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:06:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2a01486-9b4f-4bf0-91a6-b325e66b4883@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180312220132.GH4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi, Peter,
I have a question regarding to one of your comments below.
On 3/12/18 3:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 01:39:56PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>> +static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_map *map,
>> + struct stack_map_bucket *bucket,
>> + u64 *ips, u32 trace_nr)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> + struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs;
>> +
>> + bucket->nr = trace_nr;
>> + id_offs = (struct bpf_stack_build_id *)bucket->data;
>> +
>> + if (!current || !current->mm ||
>> + down_read_trylock(¤t->mm->mmap_sem) == 0) {
>
> You probably want an in_nmi() before the down_read_trylock(). Doing
> up_read() is an absolute no-no from NMI context.
The below is the final code from Song:
/*
* We cannot do up_read() in nmi context, so build_id lookup is
* only supported for non-nmi events. If at some point, it is
* possible to run find_vma() without taking the semaphore, we
* would like to allow build_id lookup in nmi context.
*
* Same fallback is used for kernel stack (!user) on a stackmap
* with build_id.
*/
if (!user || !current || !current->mm || in_nmi() ||
down_read_trylock(¤t->mm->mmap_sem) == 0) {
/* cannot access current->mm, fall back to ips */
for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
}
return;
}
....
>
> And IIUC its 'trivial' to use this stuff with hardware counters.
Here, you mentioned that it was 'trivial' to use buildid thing with
hardware counters, if I interpreted correctly. However, the hardware
counter overflow will trigger NMI. Based on the above logic,
it will default to old IP only behavior.
Could you explain a little more how to get buildid with hardware
counter overflow events?
Thanks!
>
>> + /* cannot access current->mm, fall back to ips */
>> + for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
>> + id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
>> + id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
>> + }
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
>> + vma = find_vma(current->mm, ips[i]);
>> + if (!vma || stack_map_get_build_id(vma, id_offs[i].build_id)) {
>> + /* per entry fall back to ips */
>> + id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
>> + id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + id_offs[i].offset = (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + ips[i]
>> + - vma->vm_start;
>> + id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID;
>> + }
>> + up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>> +}
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 20:39 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf stackmap with build_id+offset Song Liu
2018-03-12 20:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address Song Liu
2018-03-12 21:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-03-12 21:12 ` Song Liu
2018-03-12 21:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-03-12 22:47 ` Song Liu
2018-03-13 21:31 ` Song Liu
2018-03-12 22:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-24 0:06 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2018-03-13 9:53 ` [PATCH] bpf: fix semicolon.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2018-03-13 9:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address kbuild test robot
2018-03-12 20:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c2a01486-9b4f-4bf0-91a6-b325e66b4883@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qinteng@fb.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox