* [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll
@ 2026-09-15 21:30 Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-16 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-09-15 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem
Cc: netdev, edumazet, pabeni, andrew+netdev, horms, Jakub Kicinski,
vadim.fedorenko, arkadiusz.kubalewski, jiri, ivecera,
milena.olech, przemyslaw.kitszel
dpll_pin_ref_sync_state_set() resolves the partner's driver private data
with dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv() and passes the result to ref_sync_get() and
ref_sync_set() without looking at it. The helper returns NULL when the
partner holds no ref on that dpll. Of the two drivers implementing the
feature only zl3073x dereferences the pointer (sync_pin->id); ice ignores
it, so ice cannot fault here.
The NULL is a teardown race, not a steady state - zl3073x registers every
input pin with every channel, so the partner is normally present on the
dpll the base pin resolves to. zl3073x_dev_stop() unregisters pins one at
a time, taking and dropping dpll_lock for each, and between the partner's
turn and the base pin's the partner is out of that dpll's pin_refs while
still registered with the channels not yet torn down, so
dpll_pin_available() keeps passing. That path is not only driver removal:
devlink reload and devlink dev flash both run zl3073x_dev_stop().
Reproduced by holding that state open with a mock dpll device, which is
where the frame name comes from:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
RIP: 0010:mock_ref_sync_get+0x5/0x30
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dpll_pin_ref_sync_set+0x19f/0x4a0
dpll_nl_pin_set_doit+0x17d/0x840
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd6/0x130
genl_rcv_msg+0x181/0x2b0
netlink_rcv_skb+0x55/0x100
genl_rcv+0x23/0x30
netlink_unicast+0x24d/0x370
netlink_sendmsg+0x1e2/0x420
__sys_sendto+0x1db/0x1f0
__x64_sys_sendto+0x1f/0x30
do_syscall_64+0xe1/0x490
Commit d2e914a4a0d0 ("dpll: fix NULL pointer dereference in
dpll_msg_add_pin_ref_sync()") added the same guard to the read side, which
the kernel walks into by itself because the delete notification is emitted
from inside the unregister; the write side needs a pin-set to land in the
window and was left alone. Test the priv rather than look up pin_refs
directly, so that the two halves key off the same condition.
Fixes: 58256a26bfb3 ("dpll: add reference sync get/set")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
CC: arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com
CC: jiri@resnulli.us
CC: ivecera@redhat.com
CC: milena.olech@intel.com
CC: przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com
---
drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index d4f133ac9fea..9a90733b2da3 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ dpll_pin_ref_sync_state_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 ref_sync_pin_id,
const enum dpll_pin_state state,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
+ void *pin_priv, *ref_sync_pin_priv;
const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops;
enum dpll_pin_state old_state;
struct dpll_pin *ref_sync_pin;
@@ -1228,9 +1229,15 @@ dpll_pin_ref_sync_state_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 ref_sync_pin_id,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
dpll = ref->dpll;
- ret = ops->ref_sync_get(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin),
- ref_sync_pin,
- dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, ref_sync_pin),
+ pin_priv = dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin);
+ ref_sync_pin_priv = dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, ref_sync_pin);
+ /* Pin may have been unregistered from this dpll already */
+ if (!ref_sync_pin_priv) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+ "reference sync pin not registered with the dpll");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ ret = ops->ref_sync_get(pin, pin_priv, ref_sync_pin, ref_sync_pin_priv,
&old_state, extack);
if (ret) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "unable to get old reference sync state");
@@ -1239,9 +1246,7 @@ dpll_pin_ref_sync_state_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 ref_sync_pin_id,
if (state == old_state)
return 0;
- ret = ops->ref_sync_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin),
- ref_sync_pin,
- dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, ref_sync_pin),
+ ret = ops->ref_sync_set(pin, pin_priv, ref_sync_pin, ref_sync_pin_priv,
state, extack);
if (ret) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack,
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll
2026-09-15 21:30 [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll Jakub Kicinski
@ 2026-09-16 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-17 8:32 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-17 8:29 ` Ivan Vecera
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-09-16 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem
Cc: netdev, edumazet, pabeni, andrew+netdev, horms, vadim.fedorenko,
arkadiusz.kubalewski, jiri, ivecera, milena.olech,
przemyslaw.kitszel
On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:30:47 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> CC: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
> CC: arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com
> CC: jiri@resnulli.us
> CC: ivecera@redhat.com
How many maintainers does it take to get one ack? :/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll
2026-09-16 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2026-09-17 8:32 ` Ivan Vecera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ivan Vecera @ 2026-09-17 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, davem
Cc: netdev, edumazet, pabeni, andrew+netdev, horms, vadim.fedorenko,
arkadiusz.kubalewski, jiri, milena.olech, przemyslaw.kitszel
On 9/17/26 1:37 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:30:47 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> CC: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
>> CC: arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com
>> CC: jiri@resnulli.us
>> CC: ivecera@redhat.com
>
> How many maintainers does it take to get one ack? :/
Sorry, Jakub; I've been a bit busy these past few days since returning
from vacation.
Reviewed few minutes ago.
Thanks,
Ivan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll
2026-09-15 21:30 [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-16 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2026-09-17 8:29 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-17 12:50 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-17 13:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ivan Vecera @ 2026-09-17 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, davem
Cc: netdev, edumazet, pabeni, andrew+netdev, horms, vadim.fedorenko,
arkadiusz.kubalewski, jiri, milena.olech, przemyslaw.kitszel
On 9/15/26 11:30 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> dpll_pin_ref_sync_state_set() resolves the partner's driver private data
> with dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv() and passes the result to ref_sync_get() and
> ref_sync_set() without looking at it. The helper returns NULL when the
> partner holds no ref on that dpll. Of the two drivers implementing the
> feature only zl3073x dereferences the pointer (sync_pin->id); ice ignores
> it, so ice cannot fault here.
>
> The NULL is a teardown race, not a steady state - zl3073x registers every
> input pin with every channel, so the partner is normally present on the
> dpll the base pin resolves to. zl3073x_dev_stop() unregisters pins one at
> a time, taking and dropping dpll_lock for each, and between the partner's
> turn and the base pin's the partner is out of that dpll's pin_refs while
> still registered with the channels not yet torn down, so
> dpll_pin_available() keeps passing. That path is not only driver removal:
> devlink reload and devlink dev flash both run zl3073x_dev_stop().
>
> Reproduced by holding that state open with a mock dpll device, which is
> where the frame name comes from:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> RIP: 0010:mock_ref_sync_get+0x5/0x30
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dpll_pin_ref_sync_set+0x19f/0x4a0
> dpll_nl_pin_set_doit+0x17d/0x840
> genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd6/0x130
> genl_rcv_msg+0x181/0x2b0
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x55/0x100
> genl_rcv+0x23/0x30
> netlink_unicast+0x24d/0x370
> netlink_sendmsg+0x1e2/0x420
> __sys_sendto+0x1db/0x1f0
> __x64_sys_sendto+0x1f/0x30
> do_syscall_64+0xe1/0x490
>
> Commit d2e914a4a0d0 ("dpll: fix NULL pointer dereference in
> dpll_msg_add_pin_ref_sync()") added the same guard to the read side, which
> the kernel walks into by itself because the delete notification is emitted
> from inside the unregister; the write side needs a pin-set to land in the
> window and was left alone. Test the priv rather than look up pin_refs
> directly, so that the two halves key off the same condition.
>
> Fixes: 58256a26bfb3 ("dpll: add reference sync get/set")
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> CC: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
> CC: arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com
> CC: jiri@resnulli.us
> CC: ivecera@redhat.com
> CC: milena.olech@intel.com
> CC: przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll
2026-09-15 21:30 [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-16 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-17 8:29 ` Ivan Vecera
@ 2026-09-17 12:50 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-17 13:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-09-17 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, davem
Cc: netdev, edumazet, andrew+netdev, horms, vadim.fedorenko,
arkadiusz.kubalewski, jiri, ivecera, milena.olech,
przemyslaw.kitszel
On 9/15/26 23:30, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> dpll_pin_ref_sync_state_set() resolves the partner's driver private data
> with dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv() and passes the result to ref_sync_get() and
> ref_sync_set() without looking at it. The helper returns NULL when the
> partner holds no ref on that dpll. Of the two drivers implementing the
> feature only zl3073x dereferences the pointer (sync_pin->id); ice ignores
> it, so ice cannot fault here.
>
> The NULL is a teardown race, not a steady state - zl3073x registers every
> input pin with every channel, so the partner is normally present on the
> dpll the base pin resolves to. zl3073x_dev_stop() unregisters pins one at
> a time, taking and dropping dpll_lock for each, and between the partner's
> turn and the base pin's the partner is out of that dpll's pin_refs while
> still registered with the channels not yet torn down, so
> dpll_pin_available() keeps passing. That path is not only driver removal:
> devlink reload and devlink dev flash both run zl3073x_dev_stop().
>
> Reproduced by holding that state open with a mock dpll device, which is
> where the frame name comes from:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> RIP: 0010:mock_ref_sync_get+0x5/0x30
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dpll_pin_ref_sync_set+0x19f/0x4a0
> dpll_nl_pin_set_doit+0x17d/0x840
> genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd6/0x130
> genl_rcv_msg+0x181/0x2b0
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x55/0x100
> genl_rcv+0x23/0x30
> netlink_unicast+0x24d/0x370
> netlink_sendmsg+0x1e2/0x420
> __sys_sendto+0x1db/0x1f0
> __x64_sys_sendto+0x1f/0x30
> do_syscall_64+0xe1/0x490
>
> Commit d2e914a4a0d0 ("dpll: fix NULL pointer dereference in
> dpll_msg_add_pin_ref_sync()") added the same guard to the read side, which
> the kernel walks into by itself because the delete notification is emitted
> from inside the unregister; the write side needs a pin-set to land in the
> window and was left alone. Test the priv rather than look up pin_refs
> directly, so that the two halves key off the same condition.
>
> Fixes: 58256a26bfb3 ("dpll: add reference sync get/set")
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Note that sashiko suggests more follow-up:
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260915213047.1352286-1-kuba@kernel.org
/P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll
2026-09-15 21:30 [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll Jakub Kicinski
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-09-17 12:50 ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-09-17 13:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-09-17 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: davem, netdev, edumazet, pabeni, andrew+netdev, horms,
vadim.fedorenko, arkadiusz.kubalewski, jiri, ivecera,
milena.olech, przemyslaw.kitszel
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:30:47 -0700 you wrote:
> dpll_pin_ref_sync_state_set() resolves the partner's driver private data
> with dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv() and passes the result to ref_sync_get() and
> ref_sync_set() without looking at it. The helper returns NULL when the
> partner holds no ref on that dpll. Of the two drivers implementing the
> feature only zl3073x dereferences the pointer (sync_pin->id); ice ignores
> it, so ice cannot fault here.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/d798162eb364
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-15 21:30 [PATCH net] dpll: reject a reference sync pin which is not on the pin's dpll Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-16 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-17 8:32 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-17 8:29 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-17 12:50 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-17 13:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox