From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>,
oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com, xlpang@linux.alibaba.com,
dust.li@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: refine memory limit test in tcp_fragment()
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:19:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c98b4997-d641-432f-b2bb-cdbdb9f02143@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703032718.GC55248@TonyMac-Alibaba>
On 7/2/19 8:27 PM, Tony Lu wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> We have applied that commit e358f4af19db ("tcp: tcp_fragment() should apply sane memory limits")
> as a hotpatch in production environment. We found that it will make
> tcp long connection reset during sending out packet when applying
> that commit.
>
> Our applications which in A/B test have suffered that
> and made them retransmit large data, and then caused retransmission
> storm and lower the performance and increase RT.
>
> Therefore we discontinued to apply this hotpatch in A/B test.
>
> After invesgation, we found this patch already fix this issue in
> stable. Before applying this patch, we have some questions:
>
Which stable version are you referring to exactly ?
> 1. This commit in stable hard coded a magic number 0x20000. I am
> wondering this value and if there any better solution.
0x20000 is two times 64KB, please read the changelog for the rationale.
> 2. Is there any known or unknown side effect? If any, we could test
> it in some suspicious scenarios before testing in prod env.
No known side effect.
Honestly, applications setting small SO_SNDBUF values can not expect good TCP performance anyway.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
> Tony Lu
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 06:09:55AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> tcp_fragment() might be called for skbs in the write queue.
>>
>> Memory limits might have been exceeded because tcp_sendmsg() only
>> checks limits at full skb (64KB) boundaries.
>>
>> Therefore, we need to make sure tcp_fragment() wont punish applications
>> that might have setup very low SO_SNDBUF values.
>>
>> Fixes: f070ef2ac667 ("tcp: tcp_fragment() should apply sane memory limits")
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> index 00c01a01b547ec67c971dc25a74c9258563cf871..0ebc33d1c9e5099d163a234930e213ee35e9fbd1 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> @@ -1296,7 +1296,8 @@ int tcp_fragment(struct sock *sk, enum tcp_queue tcp_queue,
>> if (nsize < 0)
>> nsize = 0;
>>
>> - if (unlikely((sk->sk_wmem_queued >> 1) > sk->sk_sndbuf)) {
>> + if (unlikely((sk->sk_wmem_queued >> 1) > sk->sk_sndbuf &&
>> + tcp_queue != TCP_FRAG_IN_WRITE_QUEUE)) {
>> NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPWQUEUETOOBIG);
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-03 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-21 13:09 [PATCH net] tcp: refine memory limit test in tcp_fragment() Eric Dumazet
2019-06-21 14:50 ` Christoph Paasch
2019-06-22 1:00 ` David Miller
2019-07-03 3:27 ` Tony Lu
2019-07-03 9:19 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c98b4997-d641-432f-b2bb-cdbdb9f02143@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=cpaasch@apple.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox