Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jussi Maki <joamaki@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: xfrm hash to use Jenkins' hash
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:39:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce10d01f0908050139g4c152d91r9a02e1fdd0e4943d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce10d01f0908050041p43c308fav72ac640f665e161f@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 560 bytes --]

Whoops, line wrapping broke the patch, here's it again.

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jussi Mäki<joamaki@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current xfrm hash functions perform very poorly when a number of
> policies have the same
> last byte in source and destination addresses.
>
> For example with __xfrm_dst_hash, hmask of 0xfff:
>
> 192.168.0.1-172.16.0.1 hashes to 3258
> 192.168.0.2-172.16.0.2 hashes to 3258
> ... and so on.
>
> This patch addresses the issue by rewriting the xfrm
> hash functions to use the Jenkins' hash function.

[-- Attachment #2: xfrmhash.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 4881 bytes --]

Signed-off-by: Jussi Maki <joamaki@gmail.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h |   90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h b/net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h
index d401dc8..59d4cb6 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/xfrm.h>
 #include <linux/socket.h>
+#include <linux/jhash.h>
 
 static inline unsigned int __xfrm4_addr_hash(xfrm_address_t *addr)
 {
@@ -14,31 +15,27 @@ static inline unsigned int __xfrm6_addr_hash(xfrm_address_t *addr)
 	return ntohl(addr->a6[2] ^ addr->a6[3]);
 }
 
-static inline unsigned int __xfrm4_daddr_saddr_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr)
-{
-	return ntohl(daddr->a4 ^ saddr->a4);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int __xfrm6_daddr_saddr_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr)
-{
-	return ntohl(daddr->a6[2] ^ daddr->a6[3] ^
-		     saddr->a6[2] ^ saddr->a6[3]);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int __xfrm_dst_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr,
-					   u32 reqid, unsigned short family,
+static inline unsigned int __xfrm_dst_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr,
+					   xfrm_address_t *saddr,
+					   u32 reqid,
+					   unsigned short family,
 					   unsigned int hmask)
 {
-	unsigned int h = family ^ reqid;
+	unsigned int shash = 0;
+	unsigned int dhash = 0;
+
 	switch (family) {
 	case AF_INET:
-		h ^= __xfrm4_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
+		shash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(daddr);
 		break;
 	case AF_INET6:
-		h ^= __xfrm6_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
-		break;
+		shash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(daddr);
 	}
-	return (h ^ (h >> 16)) & hmask;
+
+	return jhash_3words(shash, dhash,
+			    reqid, family) & hmask;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned __xfrm_src_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr,
@@ -46,32 +43,37 @@ static inline unsigned __xfrm_src_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr,
 				       unsigned short family,
 				       unsigned int hmask)
 {
-	unsigned int h = family;
+	unsigned int shash = 0;
+	unsigned int dhash = 0;
 	switch (family) {
 	case AF_INET:
-		h ^= __xfrm4_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
+		shash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(daddr);
 		break;
 	case AF_INET6:
-		h ^= __xfrm6_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
-		break;
-	};
-	return (h ^ (h >> 16)) & hmask;
+		shash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(daddr);
+	}
+	return jhash_2words(shash, dhash, family) & hmask;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int
-__xfrm_spi_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr, __be32 spi, u8 proto, unsigned short family,
+__xfrm_spi_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr, __be32 spi, u8 proto,
+		unsigned short family,
 		unsigned int hmask)
 {
-	unsigned int h = (__force u32)spi ^ proto;
+	unsigned int h;
+
 	switch (family) {
 	case AF_INET:
-		h ^= __xfrm4_addr_hash(daddr);
+		h = __xfrm4_addr_hash(daddr);
 		break;
 	case AF_INET6:
-		h ^= __xfrm6_addr_hash(daddr);
+		h = __xfrm6_addr_hash(daddr);
 		break;
 	}
-	return (h ^ (h >> 10) ^ (h >> 20)) & hmask;
+
+	return jhash_3words(h, spi, proto, family) & hmask;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int __idx_hash(u32 index, unsigned int hmask)
@@ -83,7 +85,8 @@ static inline unsigned int __sel_hash(struct xfrm_selector *sel, unsigned short
 {
 	xfrm_address_t *daddr = &sel->daddr;
 	xfrm_address_t *saddr = &sel->saddr;
-	unsigned int h = 0;
+	unsigned int shash = 0;
+	unsigned int dhash = 0;
 
 	switch (family) {
 	case AF_INET:
@@ -91,7 +94,8 @@ static inline unsigned int __sel_hash(struct xfrm_selector *sel, unsigned short
 		    sel->prefixlen_s != 32)
 			return hmask + 1;
 
-		h = __xfrm4_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
+		shash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(daddr);
 		break;
 
 	case AF_INET6:
@@ -99,28 +103,30 @@ static inline unsigned int __sel_hash(struct xfrm_selector *sel, unsigned short
 		    sel->prefixlen_s != 128)
 			return hmask + 1;
 
-		h = __xfrm6_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
+		shash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(daddr);
 		break;
 	};
-	h ^= (h >> 16);
-	return h & hmask;
+
+	return jhash_2words(shash, dhash, family) & hmask;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int __addr_hash(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr, unsigned short family, unsigned int hmask)
 {
-	unsigned int h = 0;
+	unsigned int shash = 0;
+	unsigned int dhash = 0;
 
 	switch (family) {
 	case AF_INET:
-		h = __xfrm4_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
+		shash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm4_addr_hash(daddr);
 		break;
-
 	case AF_INET6:
-		h = __xfrm6_daddr_saddr_hash(daddr, saddr);
-		break;
-	};
-	h ^= (h >> 16);
-	return h & hmask;
+		shash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(saddr);
+		dhash = __xfrm6_addr_hash(daddr);
+	}
+
+	return jhash_2words(shash, dhash, family) & hmask;
 }
 
 extern struct hlist_head *xfrm_hash_alloc(unsigned int sz);
-- 
1.5.6.5


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-05  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-05  7:41 [PATCH] xfrm: xfrm hash to use Jenkins' hash Jussi Mäki
2009-08-05  8:39 ` Jussi Maki [this message]
2009-08-05 19:08 ` David Miller
2009-08-06  6:32   ` Jussi Maki
2009-08-06  8:58     ` Jussi Maki
2009-08-06 17:40       ` David Miller
2009-08-07  7:38         ` [PATCH] Fix xfrm hash collisions by changing __xfrm4_daddr_saddr_hash to hash addresses with addition Jussi Maki
2009-08-10  4:52           ` David Miller
2009-08-13  2:06           ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-13  3:42             ` David Miller
2009-08-13  3:53               ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-13  3:56                 ` David Miller
2009-08-13  4:11                   ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-13  4:18                     ` David Miller
2009-08-13  4:19                   ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-06 17:40     ` [PATCH] xfrm: xfrm hash to use Jenkins' hash David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ce10d01f0908050139g4c152d91r9a02e1fdd0e4943d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=joamaki@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox